Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
zzzParticipant
I personally do not believe in buying cheap insurance. You do get what you pay for. When I shopped for insurance, I found the cheaper rates were commensurate with lower coverage limits.
Good people get sued in accidents legitimately or illegitimately and do you want your personal assets to be on the line because you went with the minimal amount of liability? For me, its not worth the few hundred dollars in savings to go with lower limits.
If you own property or have any significant assets, or would like to not put your future earnings in jeopardy, you should take out an umbrella policy on top of your home and auto insurance. If you have a pet, take out an umbrella policy. The reality is if someone steps on your property and slips and falls, they can sue you.
I have State Farm. They are not the cheapest. They have great customer service and pay claims without a problem, offer many discounts for good driving record, car safety, multiple policies, and finally, they will send you rebate checks if they are having a good year! The caveat is not all agents are good. When I moved here I started with a guy downtown that was an incompetent dipshit. He calculated my premium incorrectly. He was off by like $60, but I didn’t know this when I paid the premium in full for 6 months via credit card and then proceeded to leave the country for almost 2 months. I wasn’t around to receive the new bill and he never called me so State Farm just dropped my coverage and issued me a refund check. So I come home to find that I was uninsured for about 2 weeks so if my car had been stolen I would have been SOL. A good agent would have called, but he didn’t so I just switched to another one and they’ve been great since. He had the balls to call me to ask why I switched and I told him if he had bothered to pick up the phone while I was his client to tell me I had to pay more because he couldn’t calculate the premium correctly, this wouldn’t be an issue.
zzzParticipantpeterb, historically what is the correlation with each percentage increase in unemployment and those that move out of SD? i would imagine there are some people who a. get a roommate b. move in with local parents c. ride it out if they have savings, but i’m sure a high percentage take a job elsewhere if they can get it or relocate because they cannot afford rent + bills on unemployment.
i think if unemployment picks up steam here in SD, the psychology of not wanting to be tied down to a mortgage will kick in as well EVEN if you can be cash flow positive or break even on buy vs rent. just because you have a job now doesn’t mean you will tomorrow.
zzzParticipantpeterb, historically what is the correlation with each percentage increase in unemployment and those that move out of SD? i would imagine there are some people who a. get a roommate b. move in with local parents c. ride it out if they have savings, but i’m sure a high percentage take a job elsewhere if they can get it or relocate because they cannot afford rent + bills on unemployment.
i think if unemployment picks up steam here in SD, the psychology of not wanting to be tied down to a mortgage will kick in as well EVEN if you can be cash flow positive or break even on buy vs rent. just because you have a job now doesn’t mean you will tomorrow.
zzzParticipantpeterb, historically what is the correlation with each percentage increase in unemployment and those that move out of SD? i would imagine there are some people who a. get a roommate b. move in with local parents c. ride it out if they have savings, but i’m sure a high percentage take a job elsewhere if they can get it or relocate because they cannot afford rent + bills on unemployment.
i think if unemployment picks up steam here in SD, the psychology of not wanting to be tied down to a mortgage will kick in as well EVEN if you can be cash flow positive or break even on buy vs rent. just because you have a job now doesn’t mean you will tomorrow.
zzzParticipantpeterb, historically what is the correlation with each percentage increase in unemployment and those that move out of SD? i would imagine there are some people who a. get a roommate b. move in with local parents c. ride it out if they have savings, but i’m sure a high percentage take a job elsewhere if they can get it or relocate because they cannot afford rent + bills on unemployment.
i think if unemployment picks up steam here in SD, the psychology of not wanting to be tied down to a mortgage will kick in as well EVEN if you can be cash flow positive or break even on buy vs rent. just because you have a job now doesn’t mean you will tomorrow.
zzzParticipantpeterb, historically what is the correlation with each percentage increase in unemployment and those that move out of SD? i would imagine there are some people who a. get a roommate b. move in with local parents c. ride it out if they have savings, but i’m sure a high percentage take a job elsewhere if they can get it or relocate because they cannot afford rent + bills on unemployment.
i think if unemployment picks up steam here in SD, the psychology of not wanting to be tied down to a mortgage will kick in as well EVEN if you can be cash flow positive or break even on buy vs rent. just because you have a job now doesn’t mean you will tomorrow.
zzzParticipantI agree with XBoxBoy on the fact that many of these issues appear in face value to support worthy causes, but the question should be asked as to why we can’t fund this with our existing budget which is bloated to begin with.
zzzParticipantI agree with XBoxBoy on the fact that many of these issues appear in face value to support worthy causes, but the question should be asked as to why we can’t fund this with our existing budget which is bloated to begin with.
zzzParticipantI agree with XBoxBoy on the fact that many of these issues appear in face value to support worthy causes, but the question should be asked as to why we can’t fund this with our existing budget which is bloated to begin with.
zzzParticipantI agree with XBoxBoy on the fact that many of these issues appear in face value to support worthy causes, but the question should be asked as to why we can’t fund this with our existing budget which is bloated to begin with.
zzzParticipantI agree with XBoxBoy on the fact that many of these issues appear in face value to support worthy causes, but the question should be asked as to why we can’t fund this with our existing budget which is bloated to begin with.
October 10, 2008 at 11:29 AM in reply to: When do home sellers wakeup and drop their prices? #285149zzzParticipantBorat….I understand they don’t think they can “afford” to drop their prices, but my point remains the same because those sellers don’t fall into people who must sell their homes for whatever reason. If you HAVE to sell your house, you better move it quickly and be one of the “few” to drop your price to what might be considered to be a bargain, because when everyone drops their prices, it will be too late.
The banks who held MBS, CDS too long are now in that boat. People were wondering if Merrill was prematurely dumping securities last summer and questioning the move, but now they look like freakin geniuses.
October 10, 2008 at 11:29 AM in reply to: When do home sellers wakeup and drop their prices? #285439zzzParticipantBorat….I understand they don’t think they can “afford” to drop their prices, but my point remains the same because those sellers don’t fall into people who must sell their homes for whatever reason. If you HAVE to sell your house, you better move it quickly and be one of the “few” to drop your price to what might be considered to be a bargain, because when everyone drops their prices, it will be too late.
The banks who held MBS, CDS too long are now in that boat. People were wondering if Merrill was prematurely dumping securities last summer and questioning the move, but now they look like freakin geniuses.
October 10, 2008 at 11:29 AM in reply to: When do home sellers wakeup and drop their prices? #285461zzzParticipantBorat….I understand they don’t think they can “afford” to drop their prices, but my point remains the same because those sellers don’t fall into people who must sell their homes for whatever reason. If you HAVE to sell your house, you better move it quickly and be one of the “few” to drop your price to what might be considered to be a bargain, because when everyone drops their prices, it will be too late.
The banks who held MBS, CDS too long are now in that boat. People were wondering if Merrill was prematurely dumping securities last summer and questioning the move, but now they look like freakin geniuses.
-
AuthorPosts