Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
tothjjParticipant
sorry ex-sd, just saw you posted it already…
tothjjParticipantsorry ex-sd, just saw you posted it already…
tothjjParticipantsorry ex-sd, just saw you posted it already…
tothjjParticipantsorry ex-sd, just saw you posted it already…
tothjjParticipantAnything mixed with a poodle is supposed to minimally shed. That being said, our friends bought a laber-doodle from low-end breeder and the thing sheds worse than our chocolate lab. So I think that if you are planning on getting a dog that historically does not shed, make sure that you pay for a reputable breeder. Costs more, but if you are as opposed to shedding that much, paying now beats 10-14 years of a dog you don’t like.
j
tothjjParticipantAnything mixed with a poodle is supposed to minimally shed. That being said, our friends bought a laber-doodle from low-end breeder and the thing sheds worse than our chocolate lab. So I think that if you are planning on getting a dog that historically does not shed, make sure that you pay for a reputable breeder. Costs more, but if you are as opposed to shedding that much, paying now beats 10-14 years of a dog you don’t like.
j
tothjjParticipantAnything mixed with a poodle is supposed to minimally shed. That being said, our friends bought a laber-doodle from low-end breeder and the thing sheds worse than our chocolate lab. So I think that if you are planning on getting a dog that historically does not shed, make sure that you pay for a reputable breeder. Costs more, but if you are as opposed to shedding that much, paying now beats 10-14 years of a dog you don’t like.
j
tothjjParticipantAnything mixed with a poodle is supposed to minimally shed. That being said, our friends bought a laber-doodle from low-end breeder and the thing sheds worse than our chocolate lab. So I think that if you are planning on getting a dog that historically does not shed, make sure that you pay for a reputable breeder. Costs more, but if you are as opposed to shedding that much, paying now beats 10-14 years of a dog you don’t like.
j
tothjjParticipantAnything mixed with a poodle is supposed to minimally shed. That being said, our friends bought a laber-doodle from low-end breeder and the thing sheds worse than our chocolate lab. So I think that if you are planning on getting a dog that historically does not shed, make sure that you pay for a reputable breeder. Costs more, but if you are as opposed to shedding that much, paying now beats 10-14 years of a dog you don’t like.
j
April 19, 2008 at 8:08 AM in reply to: Increasing numbers of Americans are simply walking away from their houses #190243tothjjParticipantThe simplicity of your argument is hard to counter. You entered a contract with another party. Both parties agreed on the terms and signed off on them. If one party defaults, the other party has agreed that the compensation set out in the contract is acceptable. I have no problem with a person defaulting on a contract if the other party has agreed to and then receives the requisite compensation.
April 19, 2008 at 8:08 AM in reply to: Increasing numbers of Americans are simply walking away from their houses #190265tothjjParticipantThe simplicity of your argument is hard to counter. You entered a contract with another party. Both parties agreed on the terms and signed off on them. If one party defaults, the other party has agreed that the compensation set out in the contract is acceptable. I have no problem with a person defaulting on a contract if the other party has agreed to and then receives the requisite compensation.
April 19, 2008 at 8:08 AM in reply to: Increasing numbers of Americans are simply walking away from their houses #190295tothjjParticipantThe simplicity of your argument is hard to counter. You entered a contract with another party. Both parties agreed on the terms and signed off on them. If one party defaults, the other party has agreed that the compensation set out in the contract is acceptable. I have no problem with a person defaulting on a contract if the other party has agreed to and then receives the requisite compensation.
April 19, 2008 at 8:08 AM in reply to: Increasing numbers of Americans are simply walking away from their houses #190307tothjjParticipantThe simplicity of your argument is hard to counter. You entered a contract with another party. Both parties agreed on the terms and signed off on them. If one party defaults, the other party has agreed that the compensation set out in the contract is acceptable. I have no problem with a person defaulting on a contract if the other party has agreed to and then receives the requisite compensation.
April 19, 2008 at 8:08 AM in reply to: Increasing numbers of Americans are simply walking away from their houses #190309tothjjParticipantThe simplicity of your argument is hard to counter. You entered a contract with another party. Both parties agreed on the terms and signed off on them. If one party defaults, the other party has agreed that the compensation set out in the contract is acceptable. I have no problem with a person defaulting on a contract if the other party has agreed to and then receives the requisite compensation.
-
AuthorPosts