Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
TexasLineParticipant
In all due respect, the point of the article was not about most people not understanding the Fed Reserve or the fact that powerful people have grand schemes to control the financial system, although I believe it all.
But rather that new rules and laws may be coming our way very soon that inhibit, restrict, if not forbid access to retirement/401’s etc. accounts.
A “Hope” and “Change” in the system that might indicate that the Govt itself fears a run on the banks.
TexasLineParticipantIn all due respect, the point of the article was not about most people not understanding the Fed Reserve or the fact that powerful people have grand schemes to control the financial system, although I believe it all.
But rather that new rules and laws may be coming our way very soon that inhibit, restrict, if not forbid access to retirement/401’s etc. accounts.
A “Hope” and “Change” in the system that might indicate that the Govt itself fears a run on the banks.
TexasLineParticipantIn all due respect, the point of the article was not about most people not understanding the Fed Reserve or the fact that powerful people have grand schemes to control the financial system, although I believe it all.
But rather that new rules and laws may be coming our way very soon that inhibit, restrict, if not forbid access to retirement/401’s etc. accounts.
A “Hope” and “Change” in the system that might indicate that the Govt itself fears a run on the banks.
TexasLineParticipantIn all due respect, the point of the article was not about most people not understanding the Fed Reserve or the fact that powerful people have grand schemes to control the financial system, although I believe it all.
But rather that new rules and laws may be coming our way very soon that inhibit, restrict, if not forbid access to retirement/401’s etc. accounts.
A “Hope” and “Change” in the system that might indicate that the Govt itself fears a run on the banks.
TexasLineParticipantIn all due respect, the point of the article was not about most people not understanding the Fed Reserve or the fact that powerful people have grand schemes to control the financial system, although I believe it all.
But rather that new rules and laws may be coming our way very soon that inhibit, restrict, if not forbid access to retirement/401’s etc. accounts.
A “Hope” and “Change” in the system that might indicate that the Govt itself fears a run on the banks.
TexasLineParticipantObviously….common sense says, that the world is changing. And America is a teetering egg; could go this way-could go that way. No one really knows.
But IMO – even the ant knows winter is coming and prepares for it.
That’s my modo for the last year…and likely will continue to be so.
TexasLineParticipantObviously….common sense says, that the world is changing. And America is a teetering egg; could go this way-could go that way. No one really knows.
But IMO – even the ant knows winter is coming and prepares for it.
That’s my modo for the last year…and likely will continue to be so.
TexasLineParticipantObviously….common sense says, that the world is changing. And America is a teetering egg; could go this way-could go that way. No one really knows.
But IMO – even the ant knows winter is coming and prepares for it.
That’s my modo for the last year…and likely will continue to be so.
TexasLineParticipantObviously….common sense says, that the world is changing. And America is a teetering egg; could go this way-could go that way. No one really knows.
But IMO – even the ant knows winter is coming and prepares for it.
That’s my modo for the last year…and likely will continue to be so.
TexasLineParticipantObviously….common sense says, that the world is changing. And America is a teetering egg; could go this way-could go that way. No one really knows.
But IMO – even the ant knows winter is coming and prepares for it.
That’s my modo for the last year…and likely will continue to be so.
January 13, 2010 at 10:44 PM in reply to: Buying at the courthouse steps and financing later #502025TexasLineParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]Unless you plan on buying a high-end home (think auction price above 750K minimum) I personally dont beleive this is a viable strategy for 99% of the people. Even above that I dont think its viable for 90% percent. Auctions get cancelled over and over again. The waters are full of sharks with more cash, experience and information than the layperson. The pitfalls are potentially huge.
The professional investors go everyday and buy the best deals. They dont go to buy a specific home. The average joe looking to buy a specific home faces enormous obstacles to success. The only buyer I see this as a viable strategy for is someone willing to spend about $1M or more for a house that used to be $2M+. A $2M peak priced house is going to be a great house anyway you cut it and if you can get one for 50% off you may not be so particular regarding you own preferences.
I’m not saying its impossible but rather extraordinarily unlikely to be truly successful for the average homebuyer.[/quote]
Got it. Understood. Good, good info. Makes sense. Sorry to booter1 for the highjack. I think the original question was :
Submitted by booter1 on January 13, 2010 – 6:08am
“With more and more of the high-end homes ultimately making their ways to the courthouse steps (after numerous delays/attempts at loan mods,etc)we have been considering purchasing a higher-end home when it hits the courthouse steps as a potential way to get a deal.
It seems like there is less interest from “flippers/renovators” at the high end for homes in good condition.
If one purchases a home in this way (all cash) and then seeks financing later on- what are the risks/implications?
-Is it a “recourse” loan because it is post-purchase? HLS?-”
January 13, 2010 at 10:44 PM in reply to: Buying at the courthouse steps and financing later #502172TexasLineParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]Unless you plan on buying a high-end home (think auction price above 750K minimum) I personally dont beleive this is a viable strategy for 99% of the people. Even above that I dont think its viable for 90% percent. Auctions get cancelled over and over again. The waters are full of sharks with more cash, experience and information than the layperson. The pitfalls are potentially huge.
The professional investors go everyday and buy the best deals. They dont go to buy a specific home. The average joe looking to buy a specific home faces enormous obstacles to success. The only buyer I see this as a viable strategy for is someone willing to spend about $1M or more for a house that used to be $2M+. A $2M peak priced house is going to be a great house anyway you cut it and if you can get one for 50% off you may not be so particular regarding you own preferences.
I’m not saying its impossible but rather extraordinarily unlikely to be truly successful for the average homebuyer.[/quote]
Got it. Understood. Good, good info. Makes sense. Sorry to booter1 for the highjack. I think the original question was :
Submitted by booter1 on January 13, 2010 – 6:08am
“With more and more of the high-end homes ultimately making their ways to the courthouse steps (after numerous delays/attempts at loan mods,etc)we have been considering purchasing a higher-end home when it hits the courthouse steps as a potential way to get a deal.
It seems like there is less interest from “flippers/renovators” at the high end for homes in good condition.
If one purchases a home in this way (all cash) and then seeks financing later on- what are the risks/implications?
-Is it a “recourse” loan because it is post-purchase? HLS?-”
January 13, 2010 at 10:44 PM in reply to: Buying at the courthouse steps and financing later #502570TexasLineParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]Unless you plan on buying a high-end home (think auction price above 750K minimum) I personally dont beleive this is a viable strategy for 99% of the people. Even above that I dont think its viable for 90% percent. Auctions get cancelled over and over again. The waters are full of sharks with more cash, experience and information than the layperson. The pitfalls are potentially huge.
The professional investors go everyday and buy the best deals. They dont go to buy a specific home. The average joe looking to buy a specific home faces enormous obstacles to success. The only buyer I see this as a viable strategy for is someone willing to spend about $1M or more for a house that used to be $2M+. A $2M peak priced house is going to be a great house anyway you cut it and if you can get one for 50% off you may not be so particular regarding you own preferences.
I’m not saying its impossible but rather extraordinarily unlikely to be truly successful for the average homebuyer.[/quote]
Got it. Understood. Good, good info. Makes sense. Sorry to booter1 for the highjack. I think the original question was :
Submitted by booter1 on January 13, 2010 – 6:08am
“With more and more of the high-end homes ultimately making their ways to the courthouse steps (after numerous delays/attempts at loan mods,etc)we have been considering purchasing a higher-end home when it hits the courthouse steps as a potential way to get a deal.
It seems like there is less interest from “flippers/renovators” at the high end for homes in good condition.
If one purchases a home in this way (all cash) and then seeks financing later on- what are the risks/implications?
-Is it a “recourse” loan because it is post-purchase? HLS?-”
January 13, 2010 at 10:44 PM in reply to: Buying at the courthouse steps and financing later #502665TexasLineParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]Unless you plan on buying a high-end home (think auction price above 750K minimum) I personally dont beleive this is a viable strategy for 99% of the people. Even above that I dont think its viable for 90% percent. Auctions get cancelled over and over again. The waters are full of sharks with more cash, experience and information than the layperson. The pitfalls are potentially huge.
The professional investors go everyday and buy the best deals. They dont go to buy a specific home. The average joe looking to buy a specific home faces enormous obstacles to success. The only buyer I see this as a viable strategy for is someone willing to spend about $1M or more for a house that used to be $2M+. A $2M peak priced house is going to be a great house anyway you cut it and if you can get one for 50% off you may not be so particular regarding you own preferences.
I’m not saying its impossible but rather extraordinarily unlikely to be truly successful for the average homebuyer.[/quote]
Got it. Understood. Good, good info. Makes sense. Sorry to booter1 for the highjack. I think the original question was :
Submitted by booter1 on January 13, 2010 – 6:08am
“With more and more of the high-end homes ultimately making their ways to the courthouse steps (after numerous delays/attempts at loan mods,etc)we have been considering purchasing a higher-end home when it hits the courthouse steps as a potential way to get a deal.
It seems like there is less interest from “flippers/renovators” at the high end for homes in good condition.
If one purchases a home in this way (all cash) and then seeks financing later on- what are the risks/implications?
-Is it a “recourse” loan because it is post-purchase? HLS?-”
-
AuthorPosts