Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
stansd
ParticipantCan someone help me here:
My mom is a huge Republican-Limbaugh listener, the whole bit. We constantly have debates with me arguing that fox is the most biased network of all, and her saying they are fair, but the others are biased. I have 2 kids under 3, so I don’t get much TV lately, but I just can’t fathom NBC (I do watch the nightly news) being more biased than Fox.
Can someone help me with some data to help me see this connection? I just don’t get it.
Stan
ParticipantCan someone help me here:
My mom is a huge Republican-Limbaugh listener, the whole bit. We constantly have debates with me arguing that fox is the most biased network of all, and her saying they are fair, but the others are biased. I have 2 kids under 3, so I don’t get much TV lately, but I just can’t fathom NBC (I do watch the nightly news) being more biased than Fox.
Can someone help me with some data to help me see this connection? I just don’t get it.
Stan
ParticipantCan someone help me here:
My mom is a huge Republican-Limbaugh listener, the whole bit. We constantly have debates with me arguing that fox is the most biased network of all, and her saying they are fair, but the others are biased. I have 2 kids under 3, so I don’t get much TV lately, but I just can’t fathom NBC (I do watch the nightly news) being more biased than Fox.
Can someone help me with some data to help me see this connection? I just don’t get it.
Stan
ParticipantCan someone help me here:
My mom is a huge Republican-Limbaugh listener, the whole bit. We constantly have debates with me arguing that fox is the most biased network of all, and her saying they are fair, but the others are biased. I have 2 kids under 3, so I don’t get much TV lately, but I just can’t fathom NBC (I do watch the nightly news) being more biased than Fox.
Can someone help me with some data to help me see this connection? I just don’t get it.
Stan
ParticipantRaptorduck,
I’m sorry the prospective buyer did not like your wife. I’m sure she is quite pleasant.
Stan
ParticipantRaptorduck,
I’m sorry the prospective buyer did not like your wife. I’m sure she is quite pleasant.
Stan
ParticipantRaptorduck,
I’m sorry the prospective buyer did not like your wife. I’m sure she is quite pleasant.
Stan
ParticipantRaptorduck,
I’m sorry the prospective buyer did not like your wife. I’m sure she is quite pleasant.
Stan
ParticipantRaptorduck,
I’m sorry the prospective buyer did not like your wife. I’m sure she is quite pleasant.
Stan
ParticipantI ran a regression on Rancho Bernardo awhile back. I don’t remember the exact numbers, but while the price per square foot was around $300 for houses in the area, the coefficient on square footage (marginal price per square foot) was only about $100.
Basically, there is a big ante to get any kind of a house, and the marginal cost of a bigger one is much lower for many of the reasons described above (I think income thresholds also play a role…lots of families making 100k, but many fewer making 120/150, etc….roughly, then, if a 1,500 square foot house is 500k, a 2,500 square foot house would run 600k…numbers aren’t perfect since I’m working from memory, but you get the idea.
Stan
ParticipantI ran a regression on Rancho Bernardo awhile back. I don’t remember the exact numbers, but while the price per square foot was around $300 for houses in the area, the coefficient on square footage (marginal price per square foot) was only about $100.
Basically, there is a big ante to get any kind of a house, and the marginal cost of a bigger one is much lower for many of the reasons described above (I think income thresholds also play a role…lots of families making 100k, but many fewer making 120/150, etc….roughly, then, if a 1,500 square foot house is 500k, a 2,500 square foot house would run 600k…numbers aren’t perfect since I’m working from memory, but you get the idea.
Stan
ParticipantI ran a regression on Rancho Bernardo awhile back. I don’t remember the exact numbers, but while the price per square foot was around $300 for houses in the area, the coefficient on square footage (marginal price per square foot) was only about $100.
Basically, there is a big ante to get any kind of a house, and the marginal cost of a bigger one is much lower for many of the reasons described above (I think income thresholds also play a role…lots of families making 100k, but many fewer making 120/150, etc….roughly, then, if a 1,500 square foot house is 500k, a 2,500 square foot house would run 600k…numbers aren’t perfect since I’m working from memory, but you get the idea.
Stan
ParticipantI ran a regression on Rancho Bernardo awhile back. I don’t remember the exact numbers, but while the price per square foot was around $300 for houses in the area, the coefficient on square footage (marginal price per square foot) was only about $100.
Basically, there is a big ante to get any kind of a house, and the marginal cost of a bigger one is much lower for many of the reasons described above (I think income thresholds also play a role…lots of families making 100k, but many fewer making 120/150, etc….roughly, then, if a 1,500 square foot house is 500k, a 2,500 square foot house would run 600k…numbers aren’t perfect since I’m working from memory, but you get the idea.
Stan
ParticipantI ran a regression on Rancho Bernardo awhile back. I don’t remember the exact numbers, but while the price per square foot was around $300 for houses in the area, the coefficient on square footage (marginal price per square foot) was only about $100.
Basically, there is a big ante to get any kind of a house, and the marginal cost of a bigger one is much lower for many of the reasons described above (I think income thresholds also play a role…lots of families making 100k, but many fewer making 120/150, etc….roughly, then, if a 1,500 square foot house is 500k, a 2,500 square foot house would run 600k…numbers aren’t perfect since I’m working from memory, but you get the idea.
Stan
-
AuthorPosts