Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
socalarmParticipant
thanks for the posts and the recommendations. i think this whole idea needs a re-thinking.
socalarmParticipantthanks for the posts and the recommendations. i think this whole idea needs a re-thinking.
socalarmParticipantthanks for the posts and the recommendations. i think this whole idea needs a re-thinking.
socalarmParticipantthanks for the posts and the recommendations. i think this whole idea needs a re-thinking.
socalarmParticipantthanks for the responses. i will have to check the details, but last i checked, my advisor wasn’t paid fees on the funds. he is paid an annual fee.
the bond funds are a mix of short term treasuries, except one high-yield fund which i’m uncomfortable with. when i told him so, he said (his explanation as i understood it) – a lot of high yield corporate bonds got hammered because of the sub-prime fiasco since nobody wanted to touch any high yield bonds. however, a lot of these are AAA (again, his words) so short term panic is making good bonds appear worse than they are because of the taint.
i hope i’ve conveyed what he said with some sense. apologize if this explanation amounts to garbage…socalarmParticipantthanks for the responses. i will have to check the details, but last i checked, my advisor wasn’t paid fees on the funds. he is paid an annual fee.
the bond funds are a mix of short term treasuries, except one high-yield fund which i’m uncomfortable with. when i told him so, he said (his explanation as i understood it) – a lot of high yield corporate bonds got hammered because of the sub-prime fiasco since nobody wanted to touch any high yield bonds. however, a lot of these are AAA (again, his words) so short term panic is making good bonds appear worse than they are because of the taint.
i hope i’ve conveyed what he said with some sense. apologize if this explanation amounts to garbage…socalarmParticipantthanks for the responses. i will have to check the details, but last i checked, my advisor wasn’t paid fees on the funds. he is paid an annual fee.
the bond funds are a mix of short term treasuries, except one high-yield fund which i’m uncomfortable with. when i told him so, he said (his explanation as i understood it) – a lot of high yield corporate bonds got hammered because of the sub-prime fiasco since nobody wanted to touch any high yield bonds. however, a lot of these are AAA (again, his words) so short term panic is making good bonds appear worse than they are because of the taint.
i hope i’ve conveyed what he said with some sense. apologize if this explanation amounts to garbage…socalarmParticipantthanks for the responses. i will have to check the details, but last i checked, my advisor wasn’t paid fees on the funds. he is paid an annual fee.
the bond funds are a mix of short term treasuries, except one high-yield fund which i’m uncomfortable with. when i told him so, he said (his explanation as i understood it) – a lot of high yield corporate bonds got hammered because of the sub-prime fiasco since nobody wanted to touch any high yield bonds. however, a lot of these are AAA (again, his words) so short term panic is making good bonds appear worse than they are because of the taint.
i hope i’ve conveyed what he said with some sense. apologize if this explanation amounts to garbage…socalarmParticipantthanks for the responses. i will have to check the details, but last i checked, my advisor wasn’t paid fees on the funds. he is paid an annual fee.
the bond funds are a mix of short term treasuries, except one high-yield fund which i’m uncomfortable with. when i told him so, he said (his explanation as i understood it) – a lot of high yield corporate bonds got hammered because of the sub-prime fiasco since nobody wanted to touch any high yield bonds. however, a lot of these are AAA (again, his words) so short term panic is making good bonds appear worse than they are because of the taint.
i hope i’ve conveyed what he said with some sense. apologize if this explanation amounts to garbage…socalarmParticipantHey chris,
Keep posting. I’ve been following piggington regularly without logging in for quite a while. I ‘look forward’ too…to your blog and posts here.
Hope you’re right on this and we’re not in freefall. From all the news so far, it seems there are good reasons to still be long on equities, as am I…*shudder*socalarmParticipantHey chris,
Keep posting. I’ve been following piggington regularly without logging in for quite a while. I ‘look forward’ too…to your blog and posts here.
Hope you’re right on this and we’re not in freefall. From all the news so far, it seems there are good reasons to still be long on equities, as am I…*shudder*socalarmParticipantHey chris,
Keep posting. I’ve been following piggington regularly without logging in for quite a while. I ‘look forward’ too…to your blog and posts here.
Hope you’re right on this and we’re not in freefall. From all the news so far, it seems there are good reasons to still be long on equities, as am I…*shudder*socalarmParticipantnice post bgates. sharp and well-reasoned.
November 14, 2006 at 1:06 PM in reply to: Spiegel: Bush can barely string a sentence together, and more #39960socalarmParticipant“The sad part of the story, too many
boneheads in our great country ignores the lessons of history and think, they stupid head will not be chopped off by the militant islamist, because they hated Bush and America.”i will memorize this one
-
AuthorPosts