Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
SanDiegoDaveParticipant
How about lending money?
Since the banks won’t do it, and the payday lending franchises are too risky & sleazy, how about something in between? There are plenty of solvent companies out there right now in need of cash, but who can’t get it from the banks.
I’d like a website where people who don’t have millions can still get in on venture cap and angel investing. Sort of like a brokerage, but you are a true debt holder or Class A/preferred shareholder so even if the firm goes under you get “some” money back. And if the firm makes money: you get paid first. Or best case scenario: they get bought by Google and you’ve just funded your retirement.
Think eTrade, but you get to actually contact the people running the company and see their books under NDA instead of buying a ticker symbol and relying on Internet rumor as to their financials. You and a number of other people pool together $1 mil in place of some rich guy who would have written the check all by himself. Establish a rating & tracking system where the better you are at picking business winners, the more preference you get in selection for the next deal that comes along.
SanDiegoDaveParticipantHow about lending money?
Since the banks won’t do it, and the payday lending franchises are too risky & sleazy, how about something in between? There are plenty of solvent companies out there right now in need of cash, but who can’t get it from the banks.
I’d like a website where people who don’t have millions can still get in on venture cap and angel investing. Sort of like a brokerage, but you are a true debt holder or Class A/preferred shareholder so even if the firm goes under you get “some” money back. And if the firm makes money: you get paid first. Or best case scenario: they get bought by Google and you’ve just funded your retirement.
Think eTrade, but you get to actually contact the people running the company and see their books under NDA instead of buying a ticker symbol and relying on Internet rumor as to their financials. You and a number of other people pool together $1 mil in place of some rich guy who would have written the check all by himself. Establish a rating & tracking system where the better you are at picking business winners, the more preference you get in selection for the next deal that comes along.
SanDiegoDaveParticipantHow about lending money?
Since the banks won’t do it, and the payday lending franchises are too risky & sleazy, how about something in between? There are plenty of solvent companies out there right now in need of cash, but who can’t get it from the banks.
I’d like a website where people who don’t have millions can still get in on venture cap and angel investing. Sort of like a brokerage, but you are a true debt holder or Class A/preferred shareholder so even if the firm goes under you get “some” money back. And if the firm makes money: you get paid first. Or best case scenario: they get bought by Google and you’ve just funded your retirement.
Think eTrade, but you get to actually contact the people running the company and see their books under NDA instead of buying a ticker symbol and relying on Internet rumor as to their financials. You and a number of other people pool together $1 mil in place of some rich guy who would have written the check all by himself. Establish a rating & tracking system where the better you are at picking business winners, the more preference you get in selection for the next deal that comes along.
SanDiegoDaveParticipantHow about lending money?
Since the banks won’t do it, and the payday lending franchises are too risky & sleazy, how about something in between? There are plenty of solvent companies out there right now in need of cash, but who can’t get it from the banks.
I’d like a website where people who don’t have millions can still get in on venture cap and angel investing. Sort of like a brokerage, but you are a true debt holder or Class A/preferred shareholder so even if the firm goes under you get “some” money back. And if the firm makes money: you get paid first. Or best case scenario: they get bought by Google and you’ve just funded your retirement.
Think eTrade, but you get to actually contact the people running the company and see their books under NDA instead of buying a ticker symbol and relying on Internet rumor as to their financials. You and a number of other people pool together $1 mil in place of some rich guy who would have written the check all by himself. Establish a rating & tracking system where the better you are at picking business winners, the more preference you get in selection for the next deal that comes along.
SanDiegoDaveParticipantI think that’s simplifying it a bit – as well as playing a little loose with statistics. Go to a place like the central city of Milwaukee – where almost nobody owns property – and you’ll find massive unemployment, violence, drugs, crime, etc. Then go out to the suburbs where home ownership is much higher and you’ll find a completely different scenario. It has been that way through good and bad times. Yet, you still don’t see the folks in the worst neighborhoods moving out of state (or even out of that micro area) to find jobs.
Perhaps the problem with home ownership is the way it’s viewed and implemented in this country. Get rid of 30-year mortgages and the mortgage interest deduction for a start and I think we’d see a balancing out of the pros & cons of renting vs. owning. People would not be so stuck in one place for so long if nearby economic conditions tanked. And people would be less willing to view their primary residence as an investment and more of what it is: shelter.
SanDiegoDaveParticipantI think that’s simplifying it a bit – as well as playing a little loose with statistics. Go to a place like the central city of Milwaukee – where almost nobody owns property – and you’ll find massive unemployment, violence, drugs, crime, etc. Then go out to the suburbs where home ownership is much higher and you’ll find a completely different scenario. It has been that way through good and bad times. Yet, you still don’t see the folks in the worst neighborhoods moving out of state (or even out of that micro area) to find jobs.
Perhaps the problem with home ownership is the way it’s viewed and implemented in this country. Get rid of 30-year mortgages and the mortgage interest deduction for a start and I think we’d see a balancing out of the pros & cons of renting vs. owning. People would not be so stuck in one place for so long if nearby economic conditions tanked. And people would be less willing to view their primary residence as an investment and more of what it is: shelter.
SanDiegoDaveParticipantI think that’s simplifying it a bit – as well as playing a little loose with statistics. Go to a place like the central city of Milwaukee – where almost nobody owns property – and you’ll find massive unemployment, violence, drugs, crime, etc. Then go out to the suburbs where home ownership is much higher and you’ll find a completely different scenario. It has been that way through good and bad times. Yet, you still don’t see the folks in the worst neighborhoods moving out of state (or even out of that micro area) to find jobs.
Perhaps the problem with home ownership is the way it’s viewed and implemented in this country. Get rid of 30-year mortgages and the mortgage interest deduction for a start and I think we’d see a balancing out of the pros & cons of renting vs. owning. People would not be so stuck in one place for so long if nearby economic conditions tanked. And people would be less willing to view their primary residence as an investment and more of what it is: shelter.
SanDiegoDaveParticipantI think that’s simplifying it a bit – as well as playing a little loose with statistics. Go to a place like the central city of Milwaukee – where almost nobody owns property – and you’ll find massive unemployment, violence, drugs, crime, etc. Then go out to the suburbs where home ownership is much higher and you’ll find a completely different scenario. It has been that way through good and bad times. Yet, you still don’t see the folks in the worst neighborhoods moving out of state (or even out of that micro area) to find jobs.
Perhaps the problem with home ownership is the way it’s viewed and implemented in this country. Get rid of 30-year mortgages and the mortgage interest deduction for a start and I think we’d see a balancing out of the pros & cons of renting vs. owning. People would not be so stuck in one place for so long if nearby economic conditions tanked. And people would be less willing to view their primary residence as an investment and more of what it is: shelter.
SanDiegoDaveParticipantI think that’s simplifying it a bit – as well as playing a little loose with statistics. Go to a place like the central city of Milwaukee – where almost nobody owns property – and you’ll find massive unemployment, violence, drugs, crime, etc. Then go out to the suburbs where home ownership is much higher and you’ll find a completely different scenario. It has been that way through good and bad times. Yet, you still don’t see the folks in the worst neighborhoods moving out of state (or even out of that micro area) to find jobs.
Perhaps the problem with home ownership is the way it’s viewed and implemented in this country. Get rid of 30-year mortgages and the mortgage interest deduction for a start and I think we’d see a balancing out of the pros & cons of renting vs. owning. People would not be so stuck in one place for so long if nearby economic conditions tanked. And people would be less willing to view their primary residence as an investment and more of what it is: shelter.
SanDiegoDaveParticipantDon’t forget the home invasions popping up in Carmel Valley.
SanDiegoDaveParticipantDon’t forget the home invasions popping up in Carmel Valley.
SanDiegoDaveParticipantDon’t forget the home invasions popping up in Carmel Valley.
SanDiegoDaveParticipantDon’t forget the home invasions popping up in Carmel Valley.
SanDiegoDaveParticipantDon’t forget the home invasions popping up in Carmel Valley.
-
AuthorPosts