Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 24, 2009 at 8:01 PM in reply to: Is anything made in the U.S.A. anymore? You’d be surprised #354218February 24, 2009 at 8:01 PM in reply to: Is anything made in the U.S.A. anymore? You’d be surprised #354529
ralphfurley
Participant[quote=flu]Porn seems to be doing well in the U.S. of A.[/quote]
[quote=svelte]The world’s best porn is made right here in the USA.[/quote]That was my first thought. We must be the number one producer of smut.
February 24, 2009 at 8:01 PM in reply to: Is anything made in the U.S.A. anymore? You’d be surprised #354662Participant[quote=flu]Porn seems to be doing well in the U.S. of A.[/quote]
[quote=svelte]The world’s best porn is made right here in the USA.[/quote]That was my first thought. We must be the number one producer of smut.
February 24, 2009 at 8:01 PM in reply to: Is anything made in the U.S.A. anymore? You’d be surprised #354691Participant[quote=flu]Porn seems to be doing well in the U.S. of A.[/quote]
[quote=svelte]The world’s best porn is made right here in the USA.[/quote]That was my first thought. We must be the number one producer of smut.
February 24, 2009 at 8:01 PM in reply to: Is anything made in the U.S.A. anymore? You’d be surprised #354798Participant[quote=flu]Porn seems to be doing well in the U.S. of A.[/quote]
[quote=svelte]The world’s best porn is made right here in the USA.[/quote]That was my first thought. We must be the number one producer of smut.
ParticipantI missed it. Maybe they’ll replay it again tonight on CNN.
What did he say about artificially propping up housing and pricing me out forever?
ParticipantI missed it. Maybe they’ll replay it again tonight on CNN.
What did he say about artificially propping up housing and pricing me out forever?
ParticipantI missed it. Maybe they’ll replay it again tonight on CNN.
What did he say about artificially propping up housing and pricing me out forever?
ParticipantI missed it. Maybe they’ll replay it again tonight on CNN.
What did he say about artificially propping up housing and pricing me out forever?
ParticipantI missed it. Maybe they’ll replay it again tonight on CNN.
What did he say about artificially propping up housing and pricing me out forever?
February 21, 2009 at 11:40 AM in reply to: L.A. Times story: Southern California home prices fall #351261ParticipantI read this article the other day and thought it was crap.
How do they figure that home values are below historical income ratios? I thought the median income today is on par with 2001 levels. And home prices in LA are far and beyond 2001 levels right now.
Maybe I don’t understand the data. I don’t know how the median house price in the LA area is $250K. Show me a detached house for $250K in the LA area, and I’ll show you an area I would not want to live in.
Maybe I misunderstood the article and it spoke of the homes that are actually selling. Which are the low priced crap shacks. So the super junkers are a great value now. That’s nice.
February 21, 2009 at 11:40 AM in reply to: L.A. Times story: Southern California home prices fall #351574ParticipantI read this article the other day and thought it was crap.
How do they figure that home values are below historical income ratios? I thought the median income today is on par with 2001 levels. And home prices in LA are far and beyond 2001 levels right now.
Maybe I don’t understand the data. I don’t know how the median house price in the LA area is $250K. Show me a detached house for $250K in the LA area, and I’ll show you an area I would not want to live in.
Maybe I misunderstood the article and it spoke of the homes that are actually selling. Which are the low priced crap shacks. So the super junkers are a great value now. That’s nice.
February 21, 2009 at 11:40 AM in reply to: L.A. Times story: Southern California home prices fall #351700ParticipantI read this article the other day and thought it was crap.
How do they figure that home values are below historical income ratios? I thought the median income today is on par with 2001 levels. And home prices in LA are far and beyond 2001 levels right now.
Maybe I don’t understand the data. I don’t know how the median house price in the LA area is $250K. Show me a detached house for $250K in the LA area, and I’ll show you an area I would not want to live in.
Maybe I misunderstood the article and it spoke of the homes that are actually selling. Which are the low priced crap shacks. So the super junkers are a great value now. That’s nice.
February 21, 2009 at 11:40 AM in reply to: L.A. Times story: Southern California home prices fall #351734ParticipantI read this article the other day and thought it was crap.
How do they figure that home values are below historical income ratios? I thought the median income today is on par with 2001 levels. And home prices in LA are far and beyond 2001 levels right now.
Maybe I don’t understand the data. I don’t know how the median house price in the LA area is $250K. Show me a detached house for $250K in the LA area, and I’ll show you an area I would not want to live in.
Maybe I misunderstood the article and it spoke of the homes that are actually selling. Which are the low priced crap shacks. So the super junkers are a great value now. That’s nice.
February 21, 2009 at 11:40 AM in reply to: L.A. Times story: Southern California home prices fall #351833ParticipantI read this article the other day and thought it was crap.
How do they figure that home values are below historical income ratios? I thought the median income today is on par with 2001 levels. And home prices in LA are far and beyond 2001 levels right now.
Maybe I don’t understand the data. I don’t know how the median house price in the LA area is $250K. Show me a detached house for $250K in the LA area, and I’ll show you an area I would not want to live in.
Maybe I misunderstood the article and it spoke of the homes that are actually selling. Which are the low priced crap shacks. So the super junkers are a great value now. That’s nice.
-
AuthorPosts
