[patientlywaiting]

[quote=pabloesqobar]My friend paid $275k for one on Pierce Street. It was with the help of a silent second with the City of El Cajon, or something. The unit next to him is on the market for $100k. He’s currently looking to rent it out. He can easily afford the payment but it sucks to see a friend take that kind of “loss”.[/quote]

If he got public assistance for the purchase, is he not obligated to reside in the condo or payback the loan?

[patientlywaiting]

[quote=pabloesqobar]My friend paid $275k for one on Pierce Street. It was with the help of a silent second with the City of El Cajon, or something. The unit next to him is on the market for $100k. He’s currently looking to rent it out. He can easily afford the payment but it sucks to see a friend take that kind of “loss”.[/quote]

If he got public assistance for the purchase, is he not obligated to reside in the condo or payback the loan?

[patientlywaiting]

[quote=pabloesqobar]My friend paid $275k for one on Pierce Street. It was with the help of a silent second with the City of El Cajon, or something. The unit next to him is on the market for $100k. He’s currently looking to rent it out. He can easily afford the payment but it sucks to see a friend take that kind of “loss”.[/quote]

If he got public assistance for the purchase, is he not obligated to reside in the condo or payback the loan?

[patientlywaiting]

[quote=pabloesqobar]My friend paid $275k for one on Pierce Street. It was with the help of a silent second with the City of El Cajon, or something. The unit next to him is on the market for $100k. He’s currently looking to rent it out. He can easily afford the payment but it sucks to see a friend take that kind of “loss”.[/quote]

If he got public assistance for the purchase, is he not obligated to reside in the condo or payback the loan?

[patientlywaiting]

[quote=pabloesqobar]My friend paid $275k for one on Pierce Street. It was with the help of a silent second with the City of El Cajon, or something. The unit next to him is on the market for $100k. He’s currently looking to rent it out. He can easily afford the payment but it sucks to see a friend take that kind of “loss”.[/quote]

If he got public assistance for the purchase, is he not obligated to reside in the condo or payback the loan?

[patientlywaiting]

There is no basis for any lawsuit.

It’s perfectly OK to discuss public transactions.
People have been doing that since the founding of America. The Net is like a townsquare.

The only hassle would be to respond to a lawsuit.

http://lajolla.whoboughtwhat.com/news/?c=1.2009

Remember the Ummel case?

If Realtors can’t be sued (successfully) for pumping up the comps, then bloggers who bad-mouth a neighborhood can’t be sued either.

If I overpaid, I would sue the appraisers who may have used comps which were fraudulent to justify prices. The Ummels actually settled with the appraiser.

[patientlywaiting]

There is no basis for any lawsuit.

It’s perfectly OK to discuss public transactions.
People have been doing that since the founding of America. The Net is like a townsquare.

The only hassle would be to respond to a lawsuit.

http://lajolla.whoboughtwhat.com/news/?c=1.2009

Remember the Ummel case?

If Realtors can’t be sued (successfully) for pumping up the comps, then bloggers who bad-mouth a neighborhood can’t be sued either.

If I overpaid, I would sue the appraisers who may have used comps which were fraudulent to justify prices. The Ummels actually settled with the appraiser.

[patientlywaiting]

There is no basis for any lawsuit.

It’s perfectly OK to discuss public transactions.
People have been doing that since the founding of America. The Net is like a townsquare.

The only hassle would be to respond to a lawsuit.

http://lajolla.whoboughtwhat.com/news/?c=1.2009

Remember the Ummel case?

If Realtors can’t be sued (successfully) for pumping up the comps, then bloggers who bad-mouth a neighborhood can’t be sued either.

If I overpaid, I would sue the appraisers who may have used comps which were fraudulent to justify prices. The Ummels actually settled with the appraiser.

[patientlywaiting]

There is no basis for any lawsuit.

It’s perfectly OK to discuss public transactions.
People have been doing that since the founding of America. The Net is like a townsquare.

The only hassle would be to respond to a lawsuit.

http://lajolla.whoboughtwhat.com/news/?c=1.2009

Remember the Ummel case?

If Realtors can’t be sued (successfully) for pumping up the comps, then bloggers who bad-mouth a neighborhood can’t be sued either.

If I overpaid, I would sue the appraisers who may have used comps which were fraudulent to justify prices. The Ummels actually settled with the appraiser.

[patientlywaiting]

There is no basis for any lawsuit.

It’s perfectly OK to discuss public transactions.
People have been doing that since the founding of America. The Net is like a townsquare.

The only hassle would be to respond to a lawsuit.

http://lajolla.whoboughtwhat.com/news/?c=1.2009

Remember the Ummel case?

If Realtors can’t be sued (successfully) for pumping up the comps, then bloggers who bad-mouth a neighborhood can’t be sued either.

If I overpaid, I would sue the appraisers who may have used comps which were fraudulent to justify prices. The Ummels actually settled with the appraiser.

[patientlywaiting]

I agree with you Bugs. Glad to see that you’re posting again.

[patientlywaiting]

I agree with you Bugs. Glad to see that you’re posting again.

[patientlywaiting]

I agree with you Bugs. Glad to see that you’re posting again.

[patientlywaiting]

I agree with you Bugs. Glad to see that you’re posting again.

[patientlywaiting]

I agree with you Bugs. Glad to see that you’re posting again.

[Author]

Posts