[PatentGuy]

Agree completely legalization being inevitable. Too many over 60 folks were indoctrinated by “refer madness” propaganda. Like deep seated racism, it just has to die off ….

I voted yes on 19. I don’t smoke pot, but I want no part of a government that declares war on its own people who choose to smoke pot. I turn 49 next month. The war on pot takes money out of my wallet that I would prefer to spend on something useful, and ruins far more lives than smoking pot could come close to ruining on its own.

The government has done a remarkable job of reducing the number of tobacco smokers in the U.S. Maybe they should try that route with pot (and soda, Happy Meals, and corn chips, for that matter) instead of lame propaganda, jail, guns and ruining lives.

Aside from the legalization issue, I really want Prop 19 to pass so we can see what Obama, Pelosi, and Harry “Deadhead” Reid do to oppose the will of the people in a liberal state like California.

Jerry Brown and Meg Whitman both say they are against Prop 19. Guess they are afraid to lose the over 60 voters and law enforcement union support.

Aside from Prop 19, this was a tough ballot to stomach. A real nose-holder for the governor, senate, and congressional representative races. I did see fit to write myself in for a few of the local boards (water board sounds like an easy way to sponge off the CA taxpayers and bondholders).

[PatentGuy]

Agree completely legalization being inevitable. Too many over 60 folks were indoctrinated by “refer madness” propaganda. Like deep seated racism, it just has to die off ….

I voted yes on 19. I don’t smoke pot, but I want no part of a government that declares war on its own people who choose to smoke pot. I turn 49 next month. The war on pot takes money out of my wallet that I would prefer to spend on something useful, and ruins far more lives than smoking pot could come close to ruining on its own.

The government has done a remarkable job of reducing the number of tobacco smokers in the U.S. Maybe they should try that route with pot (and soda, Happy Meals, and corn chips, for that matter) instead of lame propaganda, jail, guns and ruining lives.

Aside from the legalization issue, I really want Prop 19 to pass so we can see what Obama, Pelosi, and Harry “Deadhead” Reid do to oppose the will of the people in a liberal state like California.

Jerry Brown and Meg Whitman both say they are against Prop 19. Guess they are afraid to lose the over 60 voters and law enforcement union support.

Aside from Prop 19, this was a tough ballot to stomach. A real nose-holder for the governor, senate, and congressional representative races. I did see fit to write myself in for a few of the local boards (water board sounds like an easy way to sponge off the CA taxpayers and bondholders).

[PatentGuy]

Agree completely legalization being inevitable. Too many over 60 folks were indoctrinated by “refer madness” propaganda. Like deep seated racism, it just has to die off ….

I voted yes on 19. I don’t smoke pot, but I want no part of a government that declares war on its own people who choose to smoke pot. I turn 49 next month. The war on pot takes money out of my wallet that I would prefer to spend on something useful, and ruins far more lives than smoking pot could come close to ruining on its own.

The government has done a remarkable job of reducing the number of tobacco smokers in the U.S. Maybe they should try that route with pot (and soda, Happy Meals, and corn chips, for that matter) instead of lame propaganda, jail, guns and ruining lives.

Aside from the legalization issue, I really want Prop 19 to pass so we can see what Obama, Pelosi, and Harry “Deadhead” Reid do to oppose the will of the people in a liberal state like California.

Jerry Brown and Meg Whitman both say they are against Prop 19. Guess they are afraid to lose the over 60 voters and law enforcement union support.

Aside from Prop 19, this was a tough ballot to stomach. A real nose-holder for the governor, senate, and congressional representative races. I did see fit to write myself in for a few of the local boards (water board sounds like an easy way to sponge off the CA taxpayers and bondholders).

[PatentGuy]

Agree completely legalization being inevitable. Too many over 60 folks were indoctrinated by “refer madness” propaganda. Like deep seated racism, it just has to die off ….

I voted yes on 19. I don’t smoke pot, but I want no part of a government that declares war on its own people who choose to smoke pot. I turn 49 next month. The war on pot takes money out of my wallet that I would prefer to spend on something useful, and ruins far more lives than smoking pot could come close to ruining on its own.

The government has done a remarkable job of reducing the number of tobacco smokers in the U.S. Maybe they should try that route with pot (and soda, Happy Meals, and corn chips, for that matter) instead of lame propaganda, jail, guns and ruining lives.

Aside from the legalization issue, I really want Prop 19 to pass so we can see what Obama, Pelosi, and Harry “Deadhead” Reid do to oppose the will of the people in a liberal state like California.

Jerry Brown and Meg Whitman both say they are against Prop 19. Guess they are afraid to lose the over 60 voters and law enforcement union support.

Aside from Prop 19, this was a tough ballot to stomach. A real nose-holder for the governor, senate, and congressional representative races. I did see fit to write myself in for a few of the local boards (water board sounds like an easy way to sponge off the CA taxpayers and bondholders).

[PatentGuy]

Agree completely legalization being inevitable. Too many over 60 folks were indoctrinated by “refer madness” propaganda. Like deep seated racism, it just has to die off ….

I voted yes on 19. I don’t smoke pot, but I want no part of a government that declares war on its own people who choose to smoke pot. I turn 49 next month. The war on pot takes money out of my wallet that I would prefer to spend on something useful, and ruins far more lives than smoking pot could come close to ruining on its own.

The government has done a remarkable job of reducing the number of tobacco smokers in the U.S. Maybe they should try that route with pot (and soda, Happy Meals, and corn chips, for that matter) instead of lame propaganda, jail, guns and ruining lives.

Aside from the legalization issue, I really want Prop 19 to pass so we can see what Obama, Pelosi, and Harry “Deadhead” Reid do to oppose the will of the people in a liberal state like California.

Jerry Brown and Meg Whitman both say they are against Prop 19. Guess they are afraid to lose the over 60 voters and law enforcement union support.

Aside from Prop 19, this was a tough ballot to stomach. A real nose-holder for the governor, senate, and congressional representative races. I did see fit to write myself in for a few of the local boards (water board sounds like an easy way to sponge off the CA taxpayers and bondholders).

[PatentGuy]

I am also a registered patent attorney. I am not giving you legal advice. You are not my client.

You should work with a quality patent attorney to do the work (not an agent, unless the agent is working for an attorney to maintain your privilege among other reasons). It will cost you, but if you don’t do it right, don’t bother to do it at all. I know a few in San Diego are, if you want some names (send me a private email).

Most important to keep in mind is that a patent is not a license to do anything. Just because you apply for a patent or have one issue does not mean your invention, if commercialized, would not infringe one or more previously applied for/granted patents.

A patent is simply a license to sue somebody.

Patent lawsuits are very expensive. there are contingent fee outfits that will take on patent cases if the $$$ at stake is adequate. (Google “patent troll” for some examples).

At least 97% of granted patents amount to nothing more than wall placks. It is a very expensive plack for an individual without $$$ and a plan.

But, every now and then, someone hits it big. (I recommend the Gary Michelson song on you tube).

Good luck.

[PatentGuy]

I am also a registered patent attorney. I am not giving you legal advice. You are not my client.

You should work with a quality patent attorney to do the work (not an agent, unless the agent is working for an attorney to maintain your privilege among other reasons). It will cost you, but if you don’t do it right, don’t bother to do it at all. I know a few in San Diego are, if you want some names (send me a private email).

Most important to keep in mind is that a patent is not a license to do anything. Just because you apply for a patent or have one issue does not mean your invention, if commercialized, would not infringe one or more previously applied for/granted patents.

A patent is simply a license to sue somebody.

Patent lawsuits are very expensive. there are contingent fee outfits that will take on patent cases if the $$$ at stake is adequate. (Google “patent troll” for some examples).

At least 97% of granted patents amount to nothing more than wall placks. It is a very expensive plack for an individual without $$$ and a plan.

But, every now and then, someone hits it big. (I recommend the Gary Michelson song on you tube).

Good luck.

[PatentGuy]

I am also a registered patent attorney. I am not giving you legal advice. You are not my client.

You should work with a quality patent attorney to do the work (not an agent, unless the agent is working for an attorney to maintain your privilege among other reasons). It will cost you, but if you don’t do it right, don’t bother to do it at all. I know a few in San Diego are, if you want some names (send me a private email).

Most important to keep in mind is that a patent is not a license to do anything. Just because you apply for a patent or have one issue does not mean your invention, if commercialized, would not infringe one or more previously applied for/granted patents.

A patent is simply a license to sue somebody.

Patent lawsuits are very expensive. there are contingent fee outfits that will take on patent cases if the $$$ at stake is adequate. (Google “patent troll” for some examples).

At least 97% of granted patents amount to nothing more than wall placks. It is a very expensive plack for an individual without $$$ and a plan.

But, every now and then, someone hits it big. (I recommend the Gary Michelson song on you tube).

Good luck.

[PatentGuy]

I am also a registered patent attorney. I am not giving you legal advice. You are not my client.

You should work with a quality patent attorney to do the work (not an agent, unless the agent is working for an attorney to maintain your privilege among other reasons). It will cost you, but if you don’t do it right, don’t bother to do it at all. I know a few in San Diego are, if you want some names (send me a private email).

Most important to keep in mind is that a patent is not a license to do anything. Just because you apply for a patent or have one issue does not mean your invention, if commercialized, would not infringe one or more previously applied for/granted patents.

A patent is simply a license to sue somebody.

Patent lawsuits are very expensive. there are contingent fee outfits that will take on patent cases if the $$$ at stake is adequate. (Google “patent troll” for some examples).

At least 97% of granted patents amount to nothing more than wall placks. It is a very expensive plack for an individual without $$$ and a plan.

But, every now and then, someone hits it big. (I recommend the Gary Michelson song on you tube).

Good luck.

[PatentGuy]

I am also a registered patent attorney. I am not giving you legal advice. You are not my client.

You should work with a quality patent attorney to do the work (not an agent, unless the agent is working for an attorney to maintain your privilege among other reasons). It will cost you, but if you don’t do it right, don’t bother to do it at all. I know a few in San Diego are, if you want some names (send me a private email).

Most important to keep in mind is that a patent is not a license to do anything. Just because you apply for a patent or have one issue does not mean your invention, if commercialized, would not infringe one or more previously applied for/granted patents.

A patent is simply a license to sue somebody.

Patent lawsuits are very expensive. there are contingent fee outfits that will take on patent cases if the $$$ at stake is adequate. (Google “patent troll” for some examples).

At least 97% of granted patents amount to nothing more than wall placks. It is a very expensive plack for an individual without $$$ and a plan.

But, every now and then, someone hits it big. (I recommend the Gary Michelson song on you tube).

Good luck.

[PatentGuy]

How does one get to be a “bang manager”?

[PatentGuy]

How does one get to be a “bang manager”?

[PatentGuy]

How does one get to be a “bang manager”?

[PatentGuy]

How does one get to be a “bang manager”?

[PatentGuy]

How does one get to be a “bang manager”?

[Author]

Posts