[Mark Holmes]

atr, thank you.

You actually said that quite eloquently.

[Mark Holmes]

atr, thank you.

You actually said that quite eloquently.

[Mark Holmes]

atr, thank you.

You actually said that quite eloquently.

[Mark Holmes]

atr, thank you.

You actually said that quite eloquently.

[Mark Holmes]

atr, thank you.

You actually said that quite eloquently.

[Mark Holmes]

Marion, you said:

“I just don’t want anyone asking or expecting me to support legislation for something I view as sacred and meant to be between a man and a woman.”

I’m sorry, but this law has nothing to do with the sacred rites performed in a church. It is about state contract law – Calfiornia marriage law. It is about civil rights. Mine, that is, not yours.

Amazing the sense of entitlement you people have. Do you have no shame?

[Mark Holmes]

Marion, you said:

“I just don’t want anyone asking or expecting me to support legislation for something I view as sacred and meant to be between a man and a woman.”

I’m sorry, but this law has nothing to do with the sacred rites performed in a church. It is about state contract law – Calfiornia marriage law. It is about civil rights. Mine, that is, not yours.

Amazing the sense of entitlement you people have. Do you have no shame?

[Mark Holmes]

Marion, you said:

“I just don’t want anyone asking or expecting me to support legislation for something I view as sacred and meant to be between a man and a woman.”

I’m sorry, but this law has nothing to do with the sacred rites performed in a church. It is about state contract law – Calfiornia marriage law. It is about civil rights. Mine, that is, not yours.

Amazing the sense of entitlement you people have. Do you have no shame?

[Mark Holmes]

Marion, you said:

“I just don’t want anyone asking or expecting me to support legislation for something I view as sacred and meant to be between a man and a woman.”

I’m sorry, but this law has nothing to do with the sacred rites performed in a church. It is about state contract law – Calfiornia marriage law. It is about civil rights. Mine, that is, not yours.

Amazing the sense of entitlement you people have. Do you have no shame?

[Mark Holmes]

Marion, you said:

“I just don’t want anyone asking or expecting me to support legislation for something I view as sacred and meant to be between a man and a woman.”

I’m sorry, but this law has nothing to do with the sacred rites performed in a church. It is about state contract law – Calfiornia marriage law. It is about civil rights. Mine, that is, not yours.

Amazing the sense of entitlement you people have. Do you have no shame?

[Mark Holmes]

Marion and others; the argument you keep using is decribed in debate circles as “the slippery slope argument”. ie:

“Description of Slippery Slope

The Slippery Slope is a fallacy in which a person asserts that some event must inevitably follow from another without any argument for the inevitability of the event in question. In most cases, there are a series of steps or gradations between one event and the one in question and no reason is given as to why the intervening steps or gradations will simply be bypassed. This “argument” has the following form:

1. Event X has occurred (or will or might occur).
2. Therefore event Y will inevitably happen.

This sort of “reasoning” is fallacious because there is no reason to believe that one event must inevitably follow from another without an argument for such a claim. This is especially clear in cases in which there is a significant number of steps or gradations between one event and another.
Examples of Slippery Slope

1. “We have to stop the tuition increase! The next thing you know, they’ll be charging $40,000 a semester!”

2. “The US shouldn’t get involved militarily in other countries. Once the government sends in a few troops, it will then send in thousands to die.”

3. “You can never give anyone a break. If you do, they’ll walk all over you.”

4. “We’ve got to stop them from banning pornography. Once they start banning one form of literature, they will never stop. Next thing you know, they will be burning all the books!””

This argument is often used when someone cannot rely on logic or common sense to support their opinion.

Because gay marriage is legal in California it doesn’t mean that polygamy and bestiality is right around the corner.

Quote from:http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/slippery-slope.html

[Mark Holmes]

Marion and others; the argument you keep using is decribed in debate circles as “the slippery slope argument”. ie:

“Description of Slippery Slope

The Slippery Slope is a fallacy in which a person asserts that some event must inevitably follow from another without any argument for the inevitability of the event in question. In most cases, there are a series of steps or gradations between one event and the one in question and no reason is given as to why the intervening steps or gradations will simply be bypassed. This “argument” has the following form:

1. Event X has occurred (or will or might occur).
2. Therefore event Y will inevitably happen.

This sort of “reasoning” is fallacious because there is no reason to believe that one event must inevitably follow from another without an argument for such a claim. This is especially clear in cases in which there is a significant number of steps or gradations between one event and another.
Examples of Slippery Slope

1. “We have to stop the tuition increase! The next thing you know, they’ll be charging $40,000 a semester!”

2. “The US shouldn’t get involved militarily in other countries. Once the government sends in a few troops, it will then send in thousands to die.”

3. “You can never give anyone a break. If you do, they’ll walk all over you.”

4. “We’ve got to stop them from banning pornography. Once they start banning one form of literature, they will never stop. Next thing you know, they will be burning all the books!””

This argument is often used when someone cannot rely on logic or common sense to support their opinion.

Because gay marriage is legal in California it doesn’t mean that polygamy and bestiality is right around the corner.

Quote from:http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/slippery-slope.html

[Mark Holmes]

Marion and others; the argument you keep using is decribed in debate circles as “the slippery slope argument”. ie:

“Description of Slippery Slope

The Slippery Slope is a fallacy in which a person asserts that some event must inevitably follow from another without any argument for the inevitability of the event in question. In most cases, there are a series of steps or gradations between one event and the one in question and no reason is given as to why the intervening steps or gradations will simply be bypassed. This “argument” has the following form:

1. Event X has occurred (or will or might occur).
2. Therefore event Y will inevitably happen.

This sort of “reasoning” is fallacious because there is no reason to believe that one event must inevitably follow from another without an argument for such a claim. This is especially clear in cases in which there is a significant number of steps or gradations between one event and another.
Examples of Slippery Slope

1. “We have to stop the tuition increase! The next thing you know, they’ll be charging $40,000 a semester!”

2. “The US shouldn’t get involved militarily in other countries. Once the government sends in a few troops, it will then send in thousands to die.”

3. “You can never give anyone a break. If you do, they’ll walk all over you.”

4. “We’ve got to stop them from banning pornography. Once they start banning one form of literature, they will never stop. Next thing you know, they will be burning all the books!””

This argument is often used when someone cannot rely on logic or common sense to support their opinion.

Because gay marriage is legal in California it doesn’t mean that polygamy and bestiality is right around the corner.

Quote from:http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/slippery-slope.html

[Mark Holmes]

Marion and others; the argument you keep using is decribed in debate circles as “the slippery slope argument”. ie:

“Description of Slippery Slope

The Slippery Slope is a fallacy in which a person asserts that some event must inevitably follow from another without any argument for the inevitability of the event in question. In most cases, there are a series of steps or gradations between one event and the one in question and no reason is given as to why the intervening steps or gradations will simply be bypassed. This “argument” has the following form:

1. Event X has occurred (or will or might occur).
2. Therefore event Y will inevitably happen.

This sort of “reasoning” is fallacious because there is no reason to believe that one event must inevitably follow from another without an argument for such a claim. This is especially clear in cases in which there is a significant number of steps or gradations between one event and another.
Examples of Slippery Slope

1. “We have to stop the tuition increase! The next thing you know, they’ll be charging $40,000 a semester!”

2. “The US shouldn’t get involved militarily in other countries. Once the government sends in a few troops, it will then send in thousands to die.”

3. “You can never give anyone a break. If you do, they’ll walk all over you.”

4. “We’ve got to stop them from banning pornography. Once they start banning one form of literature, they will never stop. Next thing you know, they will be burning all the books!””

This argument is often used when someone cannot rely on logic or common sense to support their opinion.

Because gay marriage is legal in California it doesn’t mean that polygamy and bestiality is right around the corner.

Quote from:http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/slippery-slope.html

[Mark Holmes]

Marion and others; the argument you keep using is decribed in debate circles as “the slippery slope argument”. ie:

“Description of Slippery Slope

The Slippery Slope is a fallacy in which a person asserts that some event must inevitably follow from another without any argument for the inevitability of the event in question. In most cases, there are a series of steps or gradations between one event and the one in question and no reason is given as to why the intervening steps or gradations will simply be bypassed. This “argument” has the following form:

1. Event X has occurred (or will or might occur).
2. Therefore event Y will inevitably happen.

This sort of “reasoning” is fallacious because there is no reason to believe that one event must inevitably follow from another without an argument for such a claim. This is especially clear in cases in which there is a significant number of steps or gradations between one event and another.
Examples of Slippery Slope

1. “We have to stop the tuition increase! The next thing you know, they’ll be charging $40,000 a semester!”

2. “The US shouldn’t get involved militarily in other countries. Once the government sends in a few troops, it will then send in thousands to die.”

3. “You can never give anyone a break. If you do, they’ll walk all over you.”

4. “We’ve got to stop them from banning pornography. Once they start banning one form of literature, they will never stop. Next thing you know, they will be burning all the books!””

This argument is often used when someone cannot rely on logic or common sense to support their opinion.

Because gay marriage is legal in California it doesn’t mean that polygamy and bestiality is right around the corner.

Quote from:http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/slippery-slope.html

[Author]

Posts