Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 17, 2009 at 7:59 PM in reply to: I believe Home Prices (Most Places in San Diego) reached bottom or almost bottom #368336March 17, 2009 at 7:59 PM in reply to: I believe Home Prices (Most Places in San Diego) reached bottom or almost bottom #368622
kewp
ParticipantI have a theory that there is some pent up demand, which we are seeing now.
There is a finite supply of this, however.
March 17, 2009 at 7:59 PM in reply to: I believe Home Prices (Most Places in San Diego) reached bottom or almost bottom #368790ParticipantI have a theory that there is some pent up demand, which we are seeing now.
There is a finite supply of this, however.
March 17, 2009 at 7:59 PM in reply to: I believe Home Prices (Most Places in San Diego) reached bottom or almost bottom #368827ParticipantI have a theory that there is some pent up demand, which we are seeing now.
There is a finite supply of this, however.
March 17, 2009 at 7:59 PM in reply to: I believe Home Prices (Most Places in San Diego) reached bottom or almost bottom #368943ParticipantI have a theory that there is some pent up demand, which we are seeing now.
There is a finite supply of this, however.
Participant[quote=poorsaver]Interesting thread, I’d like to add a couple of observations. I was wondering why what I read about the economy is different than what I actually see. I look around me and it looks like business as usual at most places. The shopping centers are still crowded, there’s still hour long waits at restaurants in OC, freeways are more jammed than ever, the Hummers are back out in full force, and the King of Pop sold out all 50 concerts within a couple of hours. So how can we explain this phenomenon in a nasty recession? By what scaredycat originally posted. People are living rent free. If you don’t have any housing costs then it’s easy to keep on consuming like nothing’s wrong.
[/quote]I’m reminded of a story of certain Emperor fiddling while his city burned…
Beyond that, I happen to disagree. San Diego is much ‘quieter’ of late (I like it!).
Participant[quote=poorsaver]Interesting thread, I’d like to add a couple of observations. I was wondering why what I read about the economy is different than what I actually see. I look around me and it looks like business as usual at most places. The shopping centers are still crowded, there’s still hour long waits at restaurants in OC, freeways are more jammed than ever, the Hummers are back out in full force, and the King of Pop sold out all 50 concerts within a couple of hours. So how can we explain this phenomenon in a nasty recession? By what scaredycat originally posted. People are living rent free. If you don’t have any housing costs then it’s easy to keep on consuming like nothing’s wrong.
[/quote]I’m reminded of a story of certain Emperor fiddling while his city burned…
Beyond that, I happen to disagree. San Diego is much ‘quieter’ of late (I like it!).
Participant[quote=poorsaver]Interesting thread, I’d like to add a couple of observations. I was wondering why what I read about the economy is different than what I actually see. I look around me and it looks like business as usual at most places. The shopping centers are still crowded, there’s still hour long waits at restaurants in OC, freeways are more jammed than ever, the Hummers are back out in full force, and the King of Pop sold out all 50 concerts within a couple of hours. So how can we explain this phenomenon in a nasty recession? By what scaredycat originally posted. People are living rent free. If you don’t have any housing costs then it’s easy to keep on consuming like nothing’s wrong.
[/quote]I’m reminded of a story of certain Emperor fiddling while his city burned…
Beyond that, I happen to disagree. San Diego is much ‘quieter’ of late (I like it!).
Participant[quote=poorsaver]Interesting thread, I’d like to add a couple of observations. I was wondering why what I read about the economy is different than what I actually see. I look around me and it looks like business as usual at most places. The shopping centers are still crowded, there’s still hour long waits at restaurants in OC, freeways are more jammed than ever, the Hummers are back out in full force, and the King of Pop sold out all 50 concerts within a couple of hours. So how can we explain this phenomenon in a nasty recession? By what scaredycat originally posted. People are living rent free. If you don’t have any housing costs then it’s easy to keep on consuming like nothing’s wrong.
[/quote]I’m reminded of a story of certain Emperor fiddling while his city burned…
Beyond that, I happen to disagree. San Diego is much ‘quieter’ of late (I like it!).
Participant[quote=poorsaver]Interesting thread, I’d like to add a couple of observations. I was wondering why what I read about the economy is different than what I actually see. I look around me and it looks like business as usual at most places. The shopping centers are still crowded, there’s still hour long waits at restaurants in OC, freeways are more jammed than ever, the Hummers are back out in full force, and the King of Pop sold out all 50 concerts within a couple of hours. So how can we explain this phenomenon in a nasty recession? By what scaredycat originally posted. People are living rent free. If you don’t have any housing costs then it’s easy to keep on consuming like nothing’s wrong.
[/quote]I’m reminded of a story of certain Emperor fiddling while his city burned…
Beyond that, I happen to disagree. San Diego is much ‘quieter’ of late (I like it!).
March 15, 2009 at 12:22 PM in reply to: Jim Cramer gets Pounded by John Stewart on the Daily Show #366494Participant[quote=davelj] Inside information is probably the most overrated “advantage” in the financial markets. [/quote]
You should read “Fortune’s Formula”.
If can glean even a slight edge, via inside information, you can generate phenomenal returns.
However, I suspect what you are discussing is the fact that much ‘inside’ information is actually bogus. Which may be true, but I wouldn’t exactly consider it ‘inside’ then.
March 15, 2009 at 12:22 PM in reply to: Jim Cramer gets Pounded by John Stewart on the Daily Show #366784Participant[quote=davelj] Inside information is probably the most overrated “advantage” in the financial markets. [/quote]
You should read “Fortune’s Formula”.
If can glean even a slight edge, via inside information, you can generate phenomenal returns.
However, I suspect what you are discussing is the fact that much ‘inside’ information is actually bogus. Which may be true, but I wouldn’t exactly consider it ‘inside’ then.
March 15, 2009 at 12:22 PM in reply to: Jim Cramer gets Pounded by John Stewart on the Daily Show #366947Participant[quote=davelj] Inside information is probably the most overrated “advantage” in the financial markets. [/quote]
You should read “Fortune’s Formula”.
If can glean even a slight edge, via inside information, you can generate phenomenal returns.
However, I suspect what you are discussing is the fact that much ‘inside’ information is actually bogus. Which may be true, but I wouldn’t exactly consider it ‘inside’ then.
March 15, 2009 at 12:22 PM in reply to: Jim Cramer gets Pounded by John Stewart on the Daily Show #366984Participant[quote=davelj] Inside information is probably the most overrated “advantage” in the financial markets. [/quote]
You should read “Fortune’s Formula”.
If can glean even a slight edge, via inside information, you can generate phenomenal returns.
However, I suspect what you are discussing is the fact that much ‘inside’ information is actually bogus. Which may be true, but I wouldn’t exactly consider it ‘inside’ then.
March 15, 2009 at 12:22 PM in reply to: Jim Cramer gets Pounded by John Stewart on the Daily Show #367095Participant[quote=davelj] Inside information is probably the most overrated “advantage” in the financial markets. [/quote]
You should read “Fortune’s Formula”.
If can glean even a slight edge, via inside information, you can generate phenomenal returns.
However, I suspect what you are discussing is the fact that much ‘inside’ information is actually bogus. Which may be true, but I wouldn’t exactly consider it ‘inside’ then.
-
AuthorPosts