[jameswenn]

[quote=Wah-Wah][quote=taz]What’s crazy is that it ever sold for $755,000 in the first place…[/quote]

you got to look at the sale history to appreciate the madness 😉

Apr 04, 2011 Listed $446,900
Dec 13, 2010 reo $508,000
Jun 23, 2005 Sold $755,000
Feb 27, 1998 Sold $262,000
Aug 14, 1992 Sold $223,000

question to all Piggs… what do you think the fair market price should be?[/quote]

360K

[jameswenn]

[quote=Wah-Wah][quote=taz]What’s crazy is that it ever sold for $755,000 in the first place…[/quote]

you got to look at the sale history to appreciate the madness 😉

Apr 04, 2011 Listed $446,900
Dec 13, 2010 reo $508,000
Jun 23, 2005 Sold $755,000
Feb 27, 1998 Sold $262,000
Aug 14, 1992 Sold $223,000

question to all Piggs… what do you think the fair market price should be?[/quote]

360K

[jameswenn]

[quote=Wah-Wah][quote=taz]What’s crazy is that it ever sold for $755,000 in the first place…[/quote]

you got to look at the sale history to appreciate the madness 😉

Apr 04, 2011 Listed $446,900
Dec 13, 2010 reo $508,000
Jun 23, 2005 Sold $755,000
Feb 27, 1998 Sold $262,000
Aug 14, 1992 Sold $223,000

question to all Piggs… what do you think the fair market price should be?[/quote]

360K

[jameswenn]

[quote=Wah-Wah][quote=taz]What’s crazy is that it ever sold for $755,000 in the first place…[/quote]

you got to look at the sale history to appreciate the madness 😉

Apr 04, 2011 Listed $446,900
Dec 13, 2010 reo $508,000
Jun 23, 2005 Sold $755,000
Feb 27, 1998 Sold $262,000
Aug 14, 1992 Sold $223,000

question to all Piggs… what do you think the fair market price should be?[/quote]

360K

[jameswenn]

[quote=Wah-Wah][quote=taz]What’s crazy is that it ever sold for $755,000 in the first place…[/quote]

you got to look at the sale history to appreciate the madness 😉

Apr 04, 2011 Listed $446,900
Dec 13, 2010 reo $508,000
Jun 23, 2005 Sold $755,000
Feb 27, 1998 Sold $262,000
Aug 14, 1992 Sold $223,000

question to all Piggs… what do you think the fair market price should be?[/quote]

360K

[jameswenn]

If you have young kids consider private schools. They start as low as 3500 a year per child for a parochial school. They tend to be selective and use national standardized tests.

This option could give you some time to make sure you get in the right area.

[jameswenn]

If you have young kids consider private schools. They start as low as 3500 a year per child for a parochial school. They tend to be selective and use national standardized tests.

This option could give you some time to make sure you get in the right area.

[jameswenn]

If you have young kids consider private schools. They start as low as 3500 a year per child for a parochial school. They tend to be selective and use national standardized tests.

This option could give you some time to make sure you get in the right area.

[jameswenn]

If you have young kids consider private schools. They start as low as 3500 a year per child for a parochial school. They tend to be selective and use national standardized tests.

This option could give you some time to make sure you get in the right area.

[jameswenn]

If you have young kids consider private schools. They start as low as 3500 a year per child for a parochial school. They tend to be selective and use national standardized tests.

This option could give you some time to make sure you get in the right area.

[jameswenn]

[quote=briansd1]We need to increase housing starts in order to stimulate economic growth. The resale of existing house does nothing for GDP.

But how to encourage building without price appreciation? Builders need access to cheaper land, building materials and contract labor.

Interesting predicament we’re in.[/quote]

I think the local economy is tied to government spending with the Navy being the largest employer down here.

[jameswenn]

[quote=briansd1]We need to increase housing starts in order to stimulate economic growth. The resale of existing house does nothing for GDP.

But how to encourage building without price appreciation? Builders need access to cheaper land, building materials and contract labor.

Interesting predicament we’re in.[/quote]

I think the local economy is tied to government spending with the Navy being the largest employer down here.

[jameswenn]

[quote=briansd1]We need to increase housing starts in order to stimulate economic growth. The resale of existing house does nothing for GDP.

But how to encourage building without price appreciation? Builders need access to cheaper land, building materials and contract labor.

Interesting predicament we’re in.[/quote]

I think the local economy is tied to government spending with the Navy being the largest employer down here.

[jameswenn]

[quote=briansd1]We need to increase housing starts in order to stimulate economic growth. The resale of existing house does nothing for GDP.

But how to encourage building without price appreciation? Builders need access to cheaper land, building materials and contract labor.

Interesting predicament we’re in.[/quote]

I think the local economy is tied to government spending with the Navy being the largest employer down here.

[jameswenn]

[quote=briansd1]We need to increase housing starts in order to stimulate economic growth. The resale of existing house does nothing for GDP.

But how to encourage building without price appreciation? Builders need access to cheaper land, building materials and contract labor.

Interesting predicament we’re in.[/quote]

I think the local economy is tied to government spending with the Navy being the largest employer down here.

[Author]

Posts