Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 29, 2012 at 11:22 PM in reply to: What would you do for the privilege of being American ? #739003hslingerParticipant
[quote=kcal09]Nearly half of All Americans don’t pay income taxes, does that mean they should lose their privilege ?[/quote]You should lose the privilege of breathing our air since you’re so brain dead that you actually buy into the Fux news bullshite.
Please explain how FICA taxes are not Federal income taxes. Stop being Stucking Fupid.
Republicans are against abortion because they need retards like you to vote for them. Do the world a favor and abort yourself.
February 29, 2012 at 11:10 PM in reply to: What would you do for the privilege of being American ? #739002hslingerParticipantI gladly let a bunch of ignorant fools who think they are fighting for our “freedoms” die in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Isn’t that enough? If not I’ll gladly let more die in Iran if you are stupid enough to believe the GOP, have at it dumb asses.
January 15, 2012 at 2:10 PM in reply to: OT- CONTEST!!! Guess public sector household earnings #735934hslingerParticipantsdrealtor sounds like a whine connoisseur.
Only an ignorant fool would try to argue that RE isn’t a gov subsidized profession.
December 10, 2011 at 1:39 AM in reply to: People who can’t afford their house but get to keep it?! #734434hslingerParticipant[quote=bearishgurl]Under the current CA foreclosure “statutory scheme” of 111 to 141 days to trustees sale, if a lender lost $100K in “missed payments” (and followed this procedure to the letter), they would have lost $709 to $901 per day![/quote]BG it’s a good thing rationality isn’t expected of you because no one in their right mind would try to link a principle write down exclusively to missed payments.
Continue on with your whining, your irrational expectations are amusing.
December 6, 2011 at 10:24 PM in reply to: People who can’t afford their house but get to keep it?! #734159hslingerParticipantLenders have a good understanding of what they can get out of a foreclosure, if they are better off eating $1ook of the principle than foreclosing they will eat the principle. Get over it.
November 5, 2011 at 8:38 AM in reply to: Buying again, 2 years after Short Sale – questions for you pros #732276hslingerParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]I am sorry but I do not think the poster did anything wrong besides making a stupid decision to purchase a home near the top of a bubble. That was lunacy and the seller is a poster child for why we should not have 0 down loans, or for that matter FHA loans. Forcing buyers to come up with equity (in my opinion at least 20%) would lead to a much more stable market.[/quote]I wish that 20% down was the minimum requirement for a loan but I don’t see that happening.
I don’t believe in moralizing (good v evil) financial decisions and have no problem with the OP’s actions, but for him to blame the “bank” for his purchase is just childish and ignorant. That’s 100% on him.
hslingerParticipant[quote=markmax33]Well Ron Paul’s either going to win the Republican nomination or win as a third party.[/quote]Want to put money on that?
Has he made any indication that he will run as a third party candidate?
hslingerParticipant[quote=barnaby33]many of those of us who’ve been around a while are quite cognizant of the history of mortgages and finance. Tanta viva![/quote]Well if that’s true then it’s a shame your buddy is so determined to feign ignorance.
Gå dör i en brand!!
hslingerParticipant[quote=patientrenter]Modern Americans, especially in the worst bubble zones where prices have become unaffordable, have come to rely so heavily on financing that they think that buying is the same as financed buying.[/quote]Define modern Americans because your posts come off as highly naive.
Do you know anything about the history of the mortgage or just how long the vast majority of Americans have relied heavily on financing?
hslingerParticipantIt’s for bankruptcies
“The head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), which oversees the mortgage-financing companies, met with 19 Democrats and discussed a proposal that would allow bankruptcy judges to reduce principal amounts on loans.”
House R’s wont go for this anyway.
hslingerParticipant[quote=ocrenter]if the “fee and tax” portion of the ticket truly 100% go to “fee and tax” there should not be wide disparity between airlines. are your “fee and tax” all the same across the board with the various airlines?[/quote]most of it is dependent on the airport you fly into.
Sure the fee’s can be manipulated some but it’s nothing like the post I quoted. Some airlines even eat the taxes sometimes depending on the demand.
hslingerParticipant[quote=patientrenter][quote=sdrealtor]…most primary homebuyers do not, never have and never will pay cash….[/quote]
Make that most modern American homebuyers.[/quote]Are you making a case for returning to the financial systems of the 1920’s and earlier? Can I borrow your time machine?
hslingerParticipant[quote=sdduuuude]For all we know, it is a ten-cent tax and a 581.69 for “Having a pilot on the plane fee.”[/quote]It’s not.
I regularly fly SAN to Europe and have seen the itemized costs. Airport fees and taxes have exploded post 9-11.
hslingerParticipantI’d get a non-stop from San Diego to London (same dates)for $ 884.06 return on BA and then get a budget ticket on easy jet or ryanair to Frankfurt.
It wont be much more than your ticket and the nonstop across the Atlantic out of san diego can’t be beat.
-
AuthorPosts