Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
DukehornParticipant
UCGal,
I totally agree. I think a graduate education (whether liberal arts or hard science–I have both) will be more of an indicator than a split. You don’t find folks in the life sciences that will accept intelligent design.
The split actually might be between (a) business and (b) liberals arts and the sciences with regard to social conservatism. You don’t have to deal with “nasty” science classes that might contend with your view of how the world came about or with “evil” philosophy classes that challenge you to think about your place in the world.
DukehornParticipantUCGal,
I totally agree. I think a graduate education (whether liberal arts or hard science–I have both) will be more of an indicator than a split. You don’t find folks in the life sciences that will accept intelligent design.
The split actually might be between (a) business and (b) liberals arts and the sciences with regard to social conservatism. You don’t have to deal with “nasty” science classes that might contend with your view of how the world came about or with “evil” philosophy classes that challenge you to think about your place in the world.
DukehornParticipantUCGal,
I totally agree. I think a graduate education (whether liberal arts or hard science–I have both) will be more of an indicator than a split. You don’t find folks in the life sciences that will accept intelligent design.
The split actually might be between (a) business and (b) liberals arts and the sciences with regard to social conservatism. You don’t have to deal with “nasty” science classes that might contend with your view of how the world came about or with “evil” philosophy classes that challenge you to think about your place in the world.
DukehornParticipantUCGal,
I totally agree. I think a graduate education (whether liberal arts or hard science–I have both) will be more of an indicator than a split. You don’t find folks in the life sciences that will accept intelligent design.
The split actually might be between (a) business and (b) liberals arts and the sciences with regard to social conservatism. You don’t have to deal with “nasty” science classes that might contend with your view of how the world came about or with “evil” philosophy classes that challenge you to think about your place in the world.
DukehornParticipantUCGal,
I totally agree. I think a graduate education (whether liberal arts or hard science–I have both) will be more of an indicator than a split. You don’t find folks in the life sciences that will accept intelligent design.
The split actually might be between (a) business and (b) liberals arts and the sciences with regard to social conservatism. You don’t have to deal with “nasty” science classes that might contend with your view of how the world came about or with “evil” philosophy classes that challenge you to think about your place in the world.
DukehornParticipantI’ll pass on listening to folks who think dinosaurs existed 6,000 years ago. Really, I will. And I’ll say that I thought we wanted our kids to go to good schools and get educated. But different ambition for different folks….
As an fyi, on who folks are listening to:
Mark Steyn (Canadian, no college degree)
Glenn Beck (ex alchoholic, no college degree)
Rush Limbaugh (little drug issue, no college degree)
Matt Drudge (341/365 in high school, no college degree)
Sean Hannity (no college degree)Rachel Maddow (Stanford, Rhodes Scholar)
Keith Olbermann (Cornell)
Al Franken (Harvard)
Jon Stewart (William and Mary)
Stephen Colbert (Northwestern)For more data points
George WIll (PhD Princeton)
David Brooks (University of Chicago).When Parker, Will, Brooks and Noonan start complaining about the anti-education bent of the Republican party maybe some of you party faithful should listen? You’ve lost all the Rockefeller Republicans (like myself) in the past 14 years and it just seems to be getting worse.
DukehornParticipantI’ll pass on listening to folks who think dinosaurs existed 6,000 years ago. Really, I will. And I’ll say that I thought we wanted our kids to go to good schools and get educated. But different ambition for different folks….
As an fyi, on who folks are listening to:
Mark Steyn (Canadian, no college degree)
Glenn Beck (ex alchoholic, no college degree)
Rush Limbaugh (little drug issue, no college degree)
Matt Drudge (341/365 in high school, no college degree)
Sean Hannity (no college degree)Rachel Maddow (Stanford, Rhodes Scholar)
Keith Olbermann (Cornell)
Al Franken (Harvard)
Jon Stewart (William and Mary)
Stephen Colbert (Northwestern)For more data points
George WIll (PhD Princeton)
David Brooks (University of Chicago).When Parker, Will, Brooks and Noonan start complaining about the anti-education bent of the Republican party maybe some of you party faithful should listen? You’ve lost all the Rockefeller Republicans (like myself) in the past 14 years and it just seems to be getting worse.
DukehornParticipantI’ll pass on listening to folks who think dinosaurs existed 6,000 years ago. Really, I will. And I’ll say that I thought we wanted our kids to go to good schools and get educated. But different ambition for different folks….
As an fyi, on who folks are listening to:
Mark Steyn (Canadian, no college degree)
Glenn Beck (ex alchoholic, no college degree)
Rush Limbaugh (little drug issue, no college degree)
Matt Drudge (341/365 in high school, no college degree)
Sean Hannity (no college degree)Rachel Maddow (Stanford, Rhodes Scholar)
Keith Olbermann (Cornell)
Al Franken (Harvard)
Jon Stewart (William and Mary)
Stephen Colbert (Northwestern)For more data points
George WIll (PhD Princeton)
David Brooks (University of Chicago).When Parker, Will, Brooks and Noonan start complaining about the anti-education bent of the Republican party maybe some of you party faithful should listen? You’ve lost all the Rockefeller Republicans (like myself) in the past 14 years and it just seems to be getting worse.
DukehornParticipantI’ll pass on listening to folks who think dinosaurs existed 6,000 years ago. Really, I will. And I’ll say that I thought we wanted our kids to go to good schools and get educated. But different ambition for different folks….
As an fyi, on who folks are listening to:
Mark Steyn (Canadian, no college degree)
Glenn Beck (ex alchoholic, no college degree)
Rush Limbaugh (little drug issue, no college degree)
Matt Drudge (341/365 in high school, no college degree)
Sean Hannity (no college degree)Rachel Maddow (Stanford, Rhodes Scholar)
Keith Olbermann (Cornell)
Al Franken (Harvard)
Jon Stewart (William and Mary)
Stephen Colbert (Northwestern)For more data points
George WIll (PhD Princeton)
David Brooks (University of Chicago).When Parker, Will, Brooks and Noonan start complaining about the anti-education bent of the Republican party maybe some of you party faithful should listen? You’ve lost all the Rockefeller Republicans (like myself) in the past 14 years and it just seems to be getting worse.
DukehornParticipantI’ll pass on listening to folks who think dinosaurs existed 6,000 years ago. Really, I will. And I’ll say that I thought we wanted our kids to go to good schools and get educated. But different ambition for different folks….
As an fyi, on who folks are listening to:
Mark Steyn (Canadian, no college degree)
Glenn Beck (ex alchoholic, no college degree)
Rush Limbaugh (little drug issue, no college degree)
Matt Drudge (341/365 in high school, no college degree)
Sean Hannity (no college degree)Rachel Maddow (Stanford, Rhodes Scholar)
Keith Olbermann (Cornell)
Al Franken (Harvard)
Jon Stewart (William and Mary)
Stephen Colbert (Northwestern)For more data points
George WIll (PhD Princeton)
David Brooks (University of Chicago).When Parker, Will, Brooks and Noonan start complaining about the anti-education bent of the Republican party maybe some of you party faithful should listen? You’ve lost all the Rockefeller Republicans (like myself) in the past 14 years and it just seems to be getting worse.
November 6, 2008 at 3:47 PM in reply to: OT: It’s official – the majority of Californians are idiots. #300422DukehornParticipantWait,
So you KNOW why the No on Prop 8 had to avoid using the term “gays” in order to win but you’re going to criticize the campaign for not using the term in their ads?
Sorry if I vomit a bit in my mouth.
It’s around as disingenuous as those Yes on Prop 8 ads that attempt to use Massachusetts state law as an example of CA state law. Stan, you have decent arguments but the school education one wasn’t the strongest since it was premised on a law that doesn’t exist in this state (to the best of my knowledge).
November 6, 2008 at 3:47 PM in reply to: OT: It’s official – the majority of Californians are idiots. #300780DukehornParticipantWait,
So you KNOW why the No on Prop 8 had to avoid using the term “gays” in order to win but you’re going to criticize the campaign for not using the term in their ads?
Sorry if I vomit a bit in my mouth.
It’s around as disingenuous as those Yes on Prop 8 ads that attempt to use Massachusetts state law as an example of CA state law. Stan, you have decent arguments but the school education one wasn’t the strongest since it was premised on a law that doesn’t exist in this state (to the best of my knowledge).
November 6, 2008 at 3:47 PM in reply to: OT: It’s official – the majority of Californians are idiots. #300788DukehornParticipantWait,
So you KNOW why the No on Prop 8 had to avoid using the term “gays” in order to win but you’re going to criticize the campaign for not using the term in their ads?
Sorry if I vomit a bit in my mouth.
It’s around as disingenuous as those Yes on Prop 8 ads that attempt to use Massachusetts state law as an example of CA state law. Stan, you have decent arguments but the school education one wasn’t the strongest since it was premised on a law that doesn’t exist in this state (to the best of my knowledge).
November 6, 2008 at 3:47 PM in reply to: OT: It’s official – the majority of Californians are idiots. #300804DukehornParticipantWait,
So you KNOW why the No on Prop 8 had to avoid using the term “gays” in order to win but you’re going to criticize the campaign for not using the term in their ads?
Sorry if I vomit a bit in my mouth.
It’s around as disingenuous as those Yes on Prop 8 ads that attempt to use Massachusetts state law as an example of CA state law. Stan, you have decent arguments but the school education one wasn’t the strongest since it was premised on a law that doesn’t exist in this state (to the best of my knowledge).
-
AuthorPosts