[Dukehorn]

So Casca,

Are these “tit-suckers” all these high tech 6 figure types with graduate degrees that keep our economy barely above water ,or are they the defense industry contractors that get paid out for low-bid contracts that they never fulfill.

Don’t let logic cloud your bigot speech.

I’d rather be a whackdoodle than an obese white bigot who’s notion of fine dining is Applebee’s and who believes that dinosaurs frolicked with the humans a few hundred years ago.

Dang, doesn’t steroetyping suck, but go ahead, your ancestors probably sucked off the teat of a T-Rex in your mind.

[Dukehorn]

Maybe you can replace Clarence Thomas with Colin Powell and you might have an argument there.

Thomas’ career before his appellate appointment by Bush I was as a pretty piss poor politico. Assistant Secretary of Education for the Office of Civil Rights? Chairman of the EEOC? Can I yawn even more about what kind of legal skills those positions take. If you want to compare Thomas to Chief Justice Roberts (who was acclaimed by my fellows on the bar as one of the best litigators in front of the Supreme Court of this generation), he’s pure chaff.

Thomas is pretty silent during oral arguments and his SC opinions are pretty mediocre. Maybe he does believe oral arguments are unnecessary (as one of his biographers suggested), I just don’t think he’s an intellectual heavyweight compared with his peers. He wasn’t a powerhouse private practice attorney, never taught at a prestigious law school and never held legal positions as a US Attorney or with the DOJ. His resume is definitely (by a large margin) the poorest of any of the folks currently on the Supreme Court.

How about that psuedo (sic) ad hominen argument?

[Dukehorn]

Maybe you can replace Clarence Thomas with Colin Powell and you might have an argument there.

Thomas’ career before his appellate appointment by Bush I was as a pretty piss poor politico. Assistant Secretary of Education for the Office of Civil Rights? Chairman of the EEOC? Can I yawn even more about what kind of legal skills those positions take. If you want to compare Thomas to Chief Justice Roberts (who was acclaimed by my fellows on the bar as one of the best litigators in front of the Supreme Court of this generation), he’s pure chaff.

Thomas is pretty silent during oral arguments and his SC opinions are pretty mediocre. Maybe he does believe oral arguments are unnecessary (as one of his biographers suggested), I just don’t think he’s an intellectual heavyweight compared with his peers. He wasn’t a powerhouse private practice attorney, never taught at a prestigious law school and never held legal positions as a US Attorney or with the DOJ. His resume is definitely (by a large margin) the poorest of any of the folks currently on the Supreme Court.

How about that psuedo (sic) ad hominen argument?

[Dukehorn]

Maybe you can replace Clarence Thomas with Colin Powell and you might have an argument there.

Thomas’ career before his appellate appointment by Bush I was as a pretty piss poor politico. Assistant Secretary of Education for the Office of Civil Rights? Chairman of the EEOC? Can I yawn even more about what kind of legal skills those positions take. If you want to compare Thomas to Chief Justice Roberts (who was acclaimed by my fellows on the bar as one of the best litigators in front of the Supreme Court of this generation), he’s pure chaff.

Thomas is pretty silent during oral arguments and his SC opinions are pretty mediocre. Maybe he does believe oral arguments are unnecessary (as one of his biographers suggested), I just don’t think he’s an intellectual heavyweight compared with his peers. He wasn’t a powerhouse private practice attorney, never taught at a prestigious law school and never held legal positions as a US Attorney or with the DOJ. His resume is definitely (by a large margin) the poorest of any of the folks currently on the Supreme Court.

How about that psuedo (sic) ad hominen argument?

[Dukehorn]

Maybe you can replace Clarence Thomas with Colin Powell and you might have an argument there.

Thomas’ career before his appellate appointment by Bush I was as a pretty piss poor politico. Assistant Secretary of Education for the Office of Civil Rights? Chairman of the EEOC? Can I yawn even more about what kind of legal skills those positions take. If you want to compare Thomas to Chief Justice Roberts (who was acclaimed by my fellows on the bar as one of the best litigators in front of the Supreme Court of this generation), he’s pure chaff.

Thomas is pretty silent during oral arguments and his SC opinions are pretty mediocre. Maybe he does believe oral arguments are unnecessary (as one of his biographers suggested), I just don’t think he’s an intellectual heavyweight compared with his peers. He wasn’t a powerhouse private practice attorney, never taught at a prestigious law school and never held legal positions as a US Attorney or with the DOJ. His resume is definitely (by a large margin) the poorest of any of the folks currently on the Supreme Court.

How about that psuedo (sic) ad hominen argument?

[Dukehorn]

Maybe you can replace Clarence Thomas with Colin Powell and you might have an argument there.

Thomas’ career before his appellate appointment by Bush I was as a pretty piss poor politico. Assistant Secretary of Education for the Office of Civil Rights? Chairman of the EEOC? Can I yawn even more about what kind of legal skills those positions take. If you want to compare Thomas to Chief Justice Roberts (who was acclaimed by my fellows on the bar as one of the best litigators in front of the Supreme Court of this generation), he’s pure chaff.

Thomas is pretty silent during oral arguments and his SC opinions are pretty mediocre. Maybe he does believe oral arguments are unnecessary (as one of his biographers suggested), I just don’t think he’s an intellectual heavyweight compared with his peers. He wasn’t a powerhouse private practice attorney, never taught at a prestigious law school and never held legal positions as a US Attorney or with the DOJ. His resume is definitely (by a large margin) the poorest of any of the folks currently on the Supreme Court.

How about that psuedo (sic) ad hominen argument?

[Dukehorn]

Brutus,

Let’s flip the polygamy argument. I’ll give you the gay marriage point once we outlaw divorces, masturbation, anal sex and oral sex. I mean to a certain extent all of the above are considered deviant by our Moral Majority, right? So once you stop yanking your chain, I’ll start worrying about other people’s sex lives.

[Dukehorn]

Brutus,

Let’s flip the polygamy argument. I’ll give you the gay marriage point once we outlaw divorces, masturbation, anal sex and oral sex. I mean to a certain extent all of the above are considered deviant by our Moral Majority, right? So once you stop yanking your chain, I’ll start worrying about other people’s sex lives.

[Dukehorn]

Brutus,

Let’s flip the polygamy argument. I’ll give you the gay marriage point once we outlaw divorces, masturbation, anal sex and oral sex. I mean to a certain extent all of the above are considered deviant by our Moral Majority, right? So once you stop yanking your chain, I’ll start worrying about other people’s sex lives.

[Dukehorn]

Brutus,

Let’s flip the polygamy argument. I’ll give you the gay marriage point once we outlaw divorces, masturbation, anal sex and oral sex. I mean to a certain extent all of the above are considered deviant by our Moral Majority, right? So once you stop yanking your chain, I’ll start worrying about other people’s sex lives.

[Dukehorn]

Brutus,

Let’s flip the polygamy argument. I’ll give you the gay marriage point once we outlaw divorces, masturbation, anal sex and oral sex. I mean to a certain extent all of the above are considered deviant by our Moral Majority, right? So once you stop yanking your chain, I’ll start worrying about other people’s sex lives.

[Dukehorn]

PS My Con Law prof was sort of considered a pervert and we spent a full week on Bowers v. Hardwick.

[Dukehorn]

PS My Con Law prof was sort of considered a pervert and we spent a full week on Bowers v. Hardwick.

[Dukehorn]

PS My Con Law prof was sort of considered a pervert and we spent a full week on Bowers v. Hardwick.

[Dukehorn]

PS My Con Law prof was sort of considered a pervert and we spent a full week on Bowers v. Hardwick.

[Author]

Posts