Menu

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 270 total)
1 2 3 4 5 … 16 17 18
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 12, 2009 at 11:59 AM in reply to: Addicted (way OT) #364735
    David J
    Participant

    [quote=flu]I have to ask. Do any of you consider buying a vehicle with bullet resistant glass and armor plating?

    I gave serious consideration to this at one time when i was spending a lot of time in L.A.[/quote]

    I’ve driven armor plated Ford Explorers and Chevy Suburbans. Though it doesn’t really seem like they are plated, more like a heavy box within the body of the vehicle. It really weighs down the vehicle and makes you feel like you have to squeeze in the car as the box that you are in takes away a lot of interior space.

    March 12, 2009 at 11:59 AM in reply to: Addicted (way OT) #365022
    David J
    Participant

    [quote=flu]I have to ask. Do any of you consider buying a vehicle with bullet resistant glass and armor plating?

    I gave serious consideration to this at one time when i was spending a lot of time in L.A.[/quote]

    I’ve driven armor plated Ford Explorers and Chevy Suburbans. Though it doesn’t really seem like they are plated, more like a heavy box within the body of the vehicle. It really weighs down the vehicle and makes you feel like you have to squeeze in the car as the box that you are in takes away a lot of interior space.

    March 12, 2009 at 11:59 AM in reply to: Addicted (way OT) #365179
    David J
    Participant

    [quote=flu]I have to ask. Do any of you consider buying a vehicle with bullet resistant glass and armor plating?

    I gave serious consideration to this at one time when i was spending a lot of time in L.A.[/quote]

    I’ve driven armor plated Ford Explorers and Chevy Suburbans. Though it doesn’t really seem like they are plated, more like a heavy box within the body of the vehicle. It really weighs down the vehicle and makes you feel like you have to squeeze in the car as the box that you are in takes away a lot of interior space.

    March 12, 2009 at 11:59 AM in reply to: Addicted (way OT) #365215
    David J
    Participant

    [quote=flu]I have to ask. Do any of you consider buying a vehicle with bullet resistant glass and armor plating?

    I gave serious consideration to this at one time when i was spending a lot of time in L.A.[/quote]

    I’ve driven armor plated Ford Explorers and Chevy Suburbans. Though it doesn’t really seem like they are plated, more like a heavy box within the body of the vehicle. It really weighs down the vehicle and makes you feel like you have to squeeze in the car as the box that you are in takes away a lot of interior space.

    March 12, 2009 at 11:59 AM in reply to: Addicted (way OT) #365327
    David J
    Participant

    [quote=flu]I have to ask. Do any of you consider buying a vehicle with bullet resistant glass and armor plating?

    I gave serious consideration to this at one time when i was spending a lot of time in L.A.[/quote]

    I’ve driven armor plated Ford Explorers and Chevy Suburbans. Though it doesn’t really seem like they are plated, more like a heavy box within the body of the vehicle. It really weighs down the vehicle and makes you feel like you have to squeeze in the car as the box that you are in takes away a lot of interior space.

    February 21, 2009 at 6:51 PM in reply to: Handgun Helper #351611
    David J
    Participant

    [quote=Allan from Fallbrook]My dad was a huge fan of the M-1 Garand, having carried one in WWII and Korea, and I think the M-14 was superior to even the Garand. [/quote]

    We just shot an M-1 Garand yesterday, and I don’t know how they did it back then.

    February 21, 2009 at 6:51 PM in reply to: Handgun Helper #351925
    David J
    Participant

    [quote=Allan from Fallbrook]My dad was a huge fan of the M-1 Garand, having carried one in WWII and Korea, and I think the M-14 was superior to even the Garand. [/quote]

    We just shot an M-1 Garand yesterday, and I don’t know how they did it back then.

    February 21, 2009 at 6:51 PM in reply to: Handgun Helper #352051
    David J
    Participant

    [quote=Allan from Fallbrook]My dad was a huge fan of the M-1 Garand, having carried one in WWII and Korea, and I think the M-14 was superior to even the Garand. [/quote]

    We just shot an M-1 Garand yesterday, and I don’t know how they did it back then.

    February 21, 2009 at 6:51 PM in reply to: Handgun Helper #352084
    David J
    Participant

    [quote=Allan from Fallbrook]My dad was a huge fan of the M-1 Garand, having carried one in WWII and Korea, and I think the M-14 was superior to even the Garand. [/quote]

    We just shot an M-1 Garand yesterday, and I don’t know how they did it back then.

    February 21, 2009 at 6:51 PM in reply to: Handgun Helper #352185
    David J
    Participant

    [quote=Allan from Fallbrook]My dad was a huge fan of the M-1 Garand, having carried one in WWII and Korea, and I think the M-14 was superior to even the Garand. [/quote]

    We just shot an M-1 Garand yesterday, and I don’t know how they did it back then.

    February 21, 2009 at 5:56 PM in reply to: Handgun Helper #351541
    David J
    Participant

    [quote=temeculaguy]Actually the sig is just as good, has a safety, but will require a tad more training to become accurate. [/quote]

    I have a Sig P220 (.45) and there is no safety. Though, I’m not sure if they have changed this in the past couple of years.

    February 21, 2009 at 5:56 PM in reply to: Handgun Helper #351854
    David J
    Participant

    [quote=temeculaguy]Actually the sig is just as good, has a safety, but will require a tad more training to become accurate. [/quote]

    I have a Sig P220 (.45) and there is no safety. Though, I’m not sure if they have changed this in the past couple of years.

    February 21, 2009 at 5:56 PM in reply to: Handgun Helper #351981
    David J
    Participant

    [quote=temeculaguy]Actually the sig is just as good, has a safety, but will require a tad more training to become accurate. [/quote]

    I have a Sig P220 (.45) and there is no safety. Though, I’m not sure if they have changed this in the past couple of years.

    February 21, 2009 at 5:56 PM in reply to: Handgun Helper #352014
    David J
    Participant

    [quote=temeculaguy]Actually the sig is just as good, has a safety, but will require a tad more training to become accurate. [/quote]

    I have a Sig P220 (.45) and there is no safety. Though, I’m not sure if they have changed this in the past couple of years.

    February 21, 2009 at 5:56 PM in reply to: Handgun Helper #352115
    David J
    Participant

    [quote=temeculaguy]Actually the sig is just as good, has a safety, but will require a tad more training to become accurate. [/quote]

    I have a Sig P220 (.45) and there is no safety. Though, I’m not sure if they have changed this in the past couple of years.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 270 total)
1 2 3 4 5 … 16 17 18