Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Ash HousewaresParticipant
Any updates esmith? We’ve been having anecdotal evidence of cracks forming in the high end, but I’m sure I speak for all of us when I say I’m interested in the latest output from your localized HPI.
Also, check your private messages.
Ash HousewaresParticipantAny updates esmith? We’ve been having anecdotal evidence of cracks forming in the high end, but I’m sure I speak for all of us when I say I’m interested in the latest output from your localized HPI.
Also, check your private messages.
Ash HousewaresParticipantAny updates esmith? We’ve been having anecdotal evidence of cracks forming in the high end, but I’m sure I speak for all of us when I say I’m interested in the latest output from your localized HPI.
Also, check your private messages.
July 18, 2008 at 10:32 PM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #242455Ash HousewaresParticipantI think all of this is much ado about nothing. Politics 101. Move to your party’s base in the primaries, and toward the center in the general election. It’s all a show people. If you want to know how a candidate truly feels about an issue, look at their stance at least a year before they decided to run for POTUS.
July 18, 2008 at 10:32 PM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #242594Ash HousewaresParticipantI think all of this is much ado about nothing. Politics 101. Move to your party’s base in the primaries, and toward the center in the general election. It’s all a show people. If you want to know how a candidate truly feels about an issue, look at their stance at least a year before they decided to run for POTUS.
July 18, 2008 at 10:32 PM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #242602Ash HousewaresParticipantI think all of this is much ado about nothing. Politics 101. Move to your party’s base in the primaries, and toward the center in the general election. It’s all a show people. If you want to know how a candidate truly feels about an issue, look at their stance at least a year before they decided to run for POTUS.
July 18, 2008 at 10:32 PM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #242656Ash HousewaresParticipantI think all of this is much ado about nothing. Politics 101. Move to your party’s base in the primaries, and toward the center in the general election. It’s all a show people. If you want to know how a candidate truly feels about an issue, look at their stance at least a year before they decided to run for POTUS.
July 18, 2008 at 10:32 PM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #242665Ash HousewaresParticipantI think all of this is much ado about nothing. Politics 101. Move to your party’s base in the primaries, and toward the center in the general election. It’s all a show people. If you want to know how a candidate truly feels about an issue, look at their stance at least a year before they decided to run for POTUS.
Ash HousewaresParticipantWhat’s this, a list of funny music videos and no one has posted Flight of the Conchords? That’s a travesty I shall remedy:
Ash HousewaresParticipantWhat’s this, a list of funny music videos and no one has posted Flight of the Conchords? That’s a travesty I shall remedy:
Ash HousewaresParticipantWhat’s this, a list of funny music videos and no one has posted Flight of the Conchords? That’s a travesty I shall remedy:
Ash HousewaresParticipantWhat’s this, a list of funny music videos and no one has posted Flight of the Conchords? That’s a travesty I shall remedy:
Ash HousewaresParticipantWhat’s this, a list of funny music videos and no one has posted Flight of the Conchords? That’s a travesty I shall remedy:
July 17, 2008 at 5:31 PM in reply to: Off Topic: “Myth of Consensus explodes: APS Opens Global Warming Debate #241347Ash HousewaresParticipantHere’s a hypothetical question- How much agreement do you need before you have a consensus? How certain do you need to be?
I don’t think there will EVER be 100% agreement about many topics in science. Natural selection is still denied by a few with biology backgrounds, despite it being the basis for modern medicine and substantiated by the fossil record. We don’t even know how gravity works, does that mean we should cancel all new airplane orders (some evidence suggests particles at opposite ends of the universe exert forces on each other instantaneously- in contrast to the speed of light “speed limit”)? So there will always be some degree of uncertainty, but that should not stop us from planning accordingly to what we think is most likely to be true. If you wait for certainty you will wait a long time, maybe forever, meanwhile the window of time you had to do something will have long past.
There was no 100% agreement that Iraq had WMDs, but I’d bet a years wages you supported the invasion on what intelligence we had. Why the double standard? Why is spotty intelligence good enough when it fits your views, but nothing short of 100% certainty is required for ideas you find unappealing?
-
AuthorPosts