Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Artifact
ParticipantFigures for the last 3 weeks – no striking changes in the ongoing pattern. Short sales increasing faster than total listings, both of which are higher than this time last year.
[img_assist|nid=6661|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=251]
[img_assist|nid=6662|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=251]
[img_assist|nid=6663|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=276]ParticipantFigures for the last 3 weeks – no striking changes in the ongoing pattern. Short sales increasing faster than total listings, both of which are higher than this time last year.
[img_assist|nid=6661|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=251]
[img_assist|nid=6662|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=251]
[img_assist|nid=6663|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=276]ParticipantFigures for the last 3 weeks – no striking changes in the ongoing pattern. Short sales increasing faster than total listings, both of which are higher than this time last year.
[img_assist|nid=6661|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=251]
[img_assist|nid=6662|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=251]
[img_assist|nid=6663|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=276]ParticipantFigures for the last 3 weeks – no striking changes in the ongoing pattern. Short sales increasing faster than total listings, both of which are higher than this time last year.
[img_assist|nid=6661|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=251]
[img_assist|nid=6662|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=251]
[img_assist|nid=6663|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=276]February 7, 2008 at 12:03 PM in reply to: Why is the house across the street, with the pool, $200k less? #149315ParticipantInteresting to note on the house across the street:
They bought in April of 2005 for 730K, Listed in December for 549K, Reduced in January down to 499K.
If we assume the 499 is an attempt to get some offers, then we can also assume 549 was not getting them – meaning a 25% reduction from April 2005 did not get any offers – the price now is more than a 30% drop – it will be interesting to see if they get any offers not.
February 7, 2008 at 12:03 PM in reply to: Why is the house across the street, with the pool, $200k less? #149572ParticipantInteresting to note on the house across the street:
They bought in April of 2005 for 730K, Listed in December for 549K, Reduced in January down to 499K.
If we assume the 499 is an attempt to get some offers, then we can also assume 549 was not getting them – meaning a 25% reduction from April 2005 did not get any offers – the price now is more than a 30% drop – it will be interesting to see if they get any offers not.
February 7, 2008 at 12:03 PM in reply to: Why is the house across the street, with the pool, $200k less? #149587ParticipantInteresting to note on the house across the street:
They bought in April of 2005 for 730K, Listed in December for 549K, Reduced in January down to 499K.
If we assume the 499 is an attempt to get some offers, then we can also assume 549 was not getting them – meaning a 25% reduction from April 2005 did not get any offers – the price now is more than a 30% drop – it will be interesting to see if they get any offers not.
February 7, 2008 at 12:03 PM in reply to: Why is the house across the street, with the pool, $200k less? #149600ParticipantInteresting to note on the house across the street:
They bought in April of 2005 for 730K, Listed in December for 549K, Reduced in January down to 499K.
If we assume the 499 is an attempt to get some offers, then we can also assume 549 was not getting them – meaning a 25% reduction from April 2005 did not get any offers – the price now is more than a 30% drop – it will be interesting to see if they get any offers not.
February 7, 2008 at 12:03 PM in reply to: Why is the house across the street, with the pool, $200k less? #149672ParticipantInteresting to note on the house across the street:
They bought in April of 2005 for 730K, Listed in December for 549K, Reduced in January down to 499K.
If we assume the 499 is an attempt to get some offers, then we can also assume 549 was not getting them – meaning a 25% reduction from April 2005 did not get any offers – the price now is more than a 30% drop – it will be interesting to see if they get any offers not.
ParticipantThat is an interesting looking parcel – I work in Environmental Consulting and I agree that the most “likely” buyer would be a developer planning to use it as a mitigation site – even just a preserve area to offset development somewhere else.
The site does look big enough that you could “potentially” have enough area onsite that would be left open to satisfy the ACOE and CDFG (assuming the open areas were permentantly set aside as open space). Any building would most likely not impact the stream channels, which helps. I think for this parcel the Coastal Commision would be the biggest hurdle. Those observations are based only on looking at the onsite resources though, not accounting for the need to bring in utilities or gain access. Not an inexpensive project, that’s for sure.
ParticipantThat is an interesting looking parcel – I work in Environmental Consulting and I agree that the most “likely” buyer would be a developer planning to use it as a mitigation site – even just a preserve area to offset development somewhere else.
The site does look big enough that you could “potentially” have enough area onsite that would be left open to satisfy the ACOE and CDFG (assuming the open areas were permentantly set aside as open space). Any building would most likely not impact the stream channels, which helps. I think for this parcel the Coastal Commision would be the biggest hurdle. Those observations are based only on looking at the onsite resources though, not accounting for the need to bring in utilities or gain access. Not an inexpensive project, that’s for sure.
ParticipantThat is an interesting looking parcel – I work in Environmental Consulting and I agree that the most “likely” buyer would be a developer planning to use it as a mitigation site – even just a preserve area to offset development somewhere else.
The site does look big enough that you could “potentially” have enough area onsite that would be left open to satisfy the ACOE and CDFG (assuming the open areas were permentantly set aside as open space). Any building would most likely not impact the stream channels, which helps. I think for this parcel the Coastal Commision would be the biggest hurdle. Those observations are based only on looking at the onsite resources though, not accounting for the need to bring in utilities or gain access. Not an inexpensive project, that’s for sure.
ParticipantThat is an interesting looking parcel – I work in Environmental Consulting and I agree that the most “likely” buyer would be a developer planning to use it as a mitigation site – even just a preserve area to offset development somewhere else.
The site does look big enough that you could “potentially” have enough area onsite that would be left open to satisfy the ACOE and CDFG (assuming the open areas were permentantly set aside as open space). Any building would most likely not impact the stream channels, which helps. I think for this parcel the Coastal Commision would be the biggest hurdle. Those observations are based only on looking at the onsite resources though, not accounting for the need to bring in utilities or gain access. Not an inexpensive project, that’s for sure.
ParticipantThat is an interesting looking parcel – I work in Environmental Consulting and I agree that the most “likely” buyer would be a developer planning to use it as a mitigation site – even just a preserve area to offset development somewhere else.
The site does look big enough that you could “potentially” have enough area onsite that would be left open to satisfy the ACOE and CDFG (assuming the open areas were permentantly set aside as open space). Any building would most likely not impact the stream channels, which helps. I think for this parcel the Coastal Commision would be the biggest hurdle. Those observations are based only on looking at the onsite resources though, not accounting for the need to bring in utilities or gain access. Not an inexpensive project, that’s for sure.
-
AuthorPosts