[alarmclock]

I had no problems whatsoever and unless my broker was shoeshining me, I was very well qualified.

What broker said/implied was good
—————————-
* 20% down and 20% in reserves (if you are self employed, having anything less than 1+ year of liquid reserves is dicey in my mind)
* DTI (debt to income) less than 20% after purchase of house
* Credit score > 740

I had to turn in
—————-
2 years of personal tax
2 years of business tax
various business license documentation

[alarmclock]

I had no problems whatsoever and unless my broker was shoeshining me, I was very well qualified.

What broker said/implied was good
—————————-
* 20% down and 20% in reserves (if you are self employed, having anything less than 1+ year of liquid reserves is dicey in my mind)
* DTI (debt to income) less than 20% after purchase of house
* Credit score > 740

I had to turn in
—————-
2 years of personal tax
2 years of business tax
various business license documentation

[alarmclock]

I had no problems whatsoever and unless my broker was shoeshining me, I was very well qualified.

What broker said/implied was good
—————————-
* 20% down and 20% in reserves (if you are self employed, having anything less than 1+ year of liquid reserves is dicey in my mind)
* DTI (debt to income) less than 20% after purchase of house
* Credit score > 740

I had to turn in
—————-
2 years of personal tax
2 years of business tax
various business license documentation

[alarmclock]

I had no problems whatsoever and unless my broker was shoeshining me, I was very well qualified.

What broker said/implied was good
—————————-
* 20% down and 20% in reserves (if you are self employed, having anything less than 1+ year of liquid reserves is dicey in my mind)
* DTI (debt to income) less than 20% after purchase of house
* Credit score > 740

I had to turn in
—————-
2 years of personal tax
2 years of business tax
various business license documentation

[alarmclock]

I had no problems whatsoever and unless my broker was shoeshining me, I was very well qualified.

What broker said/implied was good
—————————-
* 20% down and 20% in reserves (if you are self employed, having anything less than 1+ year of liquid reserves is dicey in my mind)
* DTI (debt to income) less than 20% after purchase of house
* Credit score > 740

I had to turn in
—————-
2 years of personal tax
2 years of business tax
various business license documentation

[alarmclock]

[quote=TheBreeze] The carmaker bailout isn’t even going to amount to $200 billion most likely. Pocket change really.
[/quote]

Can you imagine what we might get if we threw $200B at Tesla Motors, ZPM, EEStor and a few other alternate technology makers? Maybe nothing, or maybe we could really start to reduce non-north-american oil dependence. But it’s always safer to go with what you know than to take a chance on something new. At least then you can’t be criticized for failing.

[alarmclock]

[quote=TheBreeze] The carmaker bailout isn’t even going to amount to $200 billion most likely. Pocket change really.
[/quote]

Can you imagine what we might get if we threw $200B at Tesla Motors, ZPM, EEStor and a few other alternate technology makers? Maybe nothing, or maybe we could really start to reduce non-north-american oil dependence. But it’s always safer to go with what you know than to take a chance on something new. At least then you can’t be criticized for failing.

[alarmclock]

[quote=TheBreeze] The carmaker bailout isn’t even going to amount to $200 billion most likely. Pocket change really.
[/quote]

Can you imagine what we might get if we threw $200B at Tesla Motors, ZPM, EEStor and a few other alternate technology makers? Maybe nothing, or maybe we could really start to reduce non-north-american oil dependence. But it’s always safer to go with what you know than to take a chance on something new. At least then you can’t be criticized for failing.

[alarmclock]

[quote=TheBreeze] The carmaker bailout isn’t even going to amount to $200 billion most likely. Pocket change really.
[/quote]

Can you imagine what we might get if we threw $200B at Tesla Motors, ZPM, EEStor and a few other alternate technology makers? Maybe nothing, or maybe we could really start to reduce non-north-american oil dependence. But it’s always safer to go with what you know than to take a chance on something new. At least then you can’t be criticized for failing.

[alarmclock]

[quote=TheBreeze] The carmaker bailout isn’t even going to amount to $200 billion most likely. Pocket change really.
[/quote]

Can you imagine what we might get if we threw $200B at Tesla Motors, ZPM, EEStor and a few other alternate technology makers? Maybe nothing, or maybe we could really start to reduce non-north-american oil dependence. But it’s always safer to go with what you know than to take a chance on something new. At least then you can’t be criticized for failing.

[alarmclock]

My bad… 1232 is the true number of the beast, when will I get this right?

[alarmclock]

My bad… 1232 is the true number of the beast, when will I get this right?

[alarmclock]

My bad… 1232 is the true number of the beast, when will I get this right?

[alarmclock]

My bad… 1232 is the true number of the beast, when will I get this right?

[alarmclock]

My bad… 1232 is the true number of the beast, when will I get this right?

[Author]

Posts