Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
4plexownerParticipant
for me the type of commute makes a huge difference – a 30 minute commute at freeway speeds might be OK (20 minutes was my limit) but 30 minutes of heavy traffic / stop-and-go / assholes playing the ‘no you aren’t getting in front of me’ game / etc would not be OK
that factor would keep me out of La Mesa / San Carlos / etc if I had to commute I-8 east between 4 and 6 PM everyday
I’ve never seen I-15 north NOT be like that north of Mira Mesa Blvd regardless of the time of day so any housing north of there is of zero interest to me – likewise for I-5 north of the merge
life is too short to sit in traffic
4plexownerParticipantfor me the type of commute makes a huge difference – a 30 minute commute at freeway speeds might be OK (20 minutes was my limit) but 30 minutes of heavy traffic / stop-and-go / assholes playing the ‘no you aren’t getting in front of me’ game / etc would not be OK
that factor would keep me out of La Mesa / San Carlos / etc if I had to commute I-8 east between 4 and 6 PM everyday
I’ve never seen I-15 north NOT be like that north of Mira Mesa Blvd regardless of the time of day so any housing north of there is of zero interest to me – likewise for I-5 north of the merge
life is too short to sit in traffic
4plexownerParticipantfor me the type of commute makes a huge difference – a 30 minute commute at freeway speeds might be OK (20 minutes was my limit) but 30 minutes of heavy traffic / stop-and-go / assholes playing the ‘no you aren’t getting in front of me’ game / etc would not be OK
that factor would keep me out of La Mesa / San Carlos / etc if I had to commute I-8 east between 4 and 6 PM everyday
I’ve never seen I-15 north NOT be like that north of Mira Mesa Blvd regardless of the time of day so any housing north of there is of zero interest to me – likewise for I-5 north of the merge
life is too short to sit in traffic
4plexownerParticipantfor me the type of commute makes a huge difference – a 30 minute commute at freeway speeds might be OK (20 minutes was my limit) but 30 minutes of heavy traffic / stop-and-go / assholes playing the ‘no you aren’t getting in front of me’ game / etc would not be OK
that factor would keep me out of La Mesa / San Carlos / etc if I had to commute I-8 east between 4 and 6 PM everyday
I’ve never seen I-15 north NOT be like that north of Mira Mesa Blvd regardless of the time of day so any housing north of there is of zero interest to me – likewise for I-5 north of the merge
life is too short to sit in traffic
4plexownerParticipantgetting into the beach areas and parking on the weekends isn’t too bad BEFORE 10 AM – after 10 you have to really want to go to the beach to put up with the traffic and parking issues
what do you mean, “what’s the point?” – watching the dogs at Dog Beach, walking the OB Pier and Newport Ave, walking/skating the boardwalk along Mission Beach – I saw dolphins surfing the waves in MB last year – quite a sight – no question but what they were just doing it for fun – they’d ride a wave in and then swim back out to the line up – I watched them surf for 15 minutes before continuing my walk
4plexownerParticipantgetting into the beach areas and parking on the weekends isn’t too bad BEFORE 10 AM – after 10 you have to really want to go to the beach to put up with the traffic and parking issues
what do you mean, “what’s the point?” – watching the dogs at Dog Beach, walking the OB Pier and Newport Ave, walking/skating the boardwalk along Mission Beach – I saw dolphins surfing the waves in MB last year – quite a sight – no question but what they were just doing it for fun – they’d ride a wave in and then swim back out to the line up – I watched them surf for 15 minutes before continuing my walk
4plexownerParticipantgetting into the beach areas and parking on the weekends isn’t too bad BEFORE 10 AM – after 10 you have to really want to go to the beach to put up with the traffic and parking issues
what do you mean, “what’s the point?” – watching the dogs at Dog Beach, walking the OB Pier and Newport Ave, walking/skating the boardwalk along Mission Beach – I saw dolphins surfing the waves in MB last year – quite a sight – no question but what they were just doing it for fun – they’d ride a wave in and then swim back out to the line up – I watched them surf for 15 minutes before continuing my walk
4plexownerParticipantgetting into the beach areas and parking on the weekends isn’t too bad BEFORE 10 AM – after 10 you have to really want to go to the beach to put up with the traffic and parking issues
what do you mean, “what’s the point?” – watching the dogs at Dog Beach, walking the OB Pier and Newport Ave, walking/skating the boardwalk along Mission Beach – I saw dolphins surfing the waves in MB last year – quite a sight – no question but what they were just doing it for fun – they’d ride a wave in and then swim back out to the line up – I watched them surf for 15 minutes before continuing my walk
4plexownerParticipantgetting into the beach areas and parking on the weekends isn’t too bad BEFORE 10 AM – after 10 you have to really want to go to the beach to put up with the traffic and parking issues
what do you mean, “what’s the point?” – watching the dogs at Dog Beach, walking the OB Pier and Newport Ave, walking/skating the boardwalk along Mission Beach – I saw dolphins surfing the waves in MB last year – quite a sight – no question but what they were just doing it for fun – they’d ride a wave in and then swim back out to the line up – I watched them surf for 15 minutes before continuing my walk
4plexownerParticipant“If your prospective tenants don’t ‘check out’ for any reason”
I’m not being confrontational here but this is another area where a landlord can get in trouble
CA law says that a landlord is supposed to rent to the first qualified tenant who applies – rejecting a tenant because they don’t ‘check out’ could put the landlord on shaky ground if the rejected applicant decides to push the issue – the rejected applicant might even claim discrimination if they are just looking for a lawsuit (not that we live in a litigious society or anything!)
to protect yourself from this you need to have a written list of what constitutes a qualified tenant – I never provided this list to an applicant but I had it available if the issue ever came up
another way to protect yourself is to NEVER tell an applicant that they are the first person to apply
4plexownerParticipant“If your prospective tenants don’t ‘check out’ for any reason”
I’m not being confrontational here but this is another area where a landlord can get in trouble
CA law says that a landlord is supposed to rent to the first qualified tenant who applies – rejecting a tenant because they don’t ‘check out’ could put the landlord on shaky ground if the rejected applicant decides to push the issue – the rejected applicant might even claim discrimination if they are just looking for a lawsuit (not that we live in a litigious society or anything!)
to protect yourself from this you need to have a written list of what constitutes a qualified tenant – I never provided this list to an applicant but I had it available if the issue ever came up
another way to protect yourself is to NEVER tell an applicant that they are the first person to apply
4plexownerParticipant“If your prospective tenants don’t ‘check out’ for any reason”
I’m not being confrontational here but this is another area where a landlord can get in trouble
CA law says that a landlord is supposed to rent to the first qualified tenant who applies – rejecting a tenant because they don’t ‘check out’ could put the landlord on shaky ground if the rejected applicant decides to push the issue – the rejected applicant might even claim discrimination if they are just looking for a lawsuit (not that we live in a litigious society or anything!)
to protect yourself from this you need to have a written list of what constitutes a qualified tenant – I never provided this list to an applicant but I had it available if the issue ever came up
another way to protect yourself is to NEVER tell an applicant that they are the first person to apply
4plexownerParticipant“If your prospective tenants don’t ‘check out’ for any reason”
I’m not being confrontational here but this is another area where a landlord can get in trouble
CA law says that a landlord is supposed to rent to the first qualified tenant who applies – rejecting a tenant because they don’t ‘check out’ could put the landlord on shaky ground if the rejected applicant decides to push the issue – the rejected applicant might even claim discrimination if they are just looking for a lawsuit (not that we live in a litigious society or anything!)
to protect yourself from this you need to have a written list of what constitutes a qualified tenant – I never provided this list to an applicant but I had it available if the issue ever came up
another way to protect yourself is to NEVER tell an applicant that they are the first person to apply
4plexownerParticipant“If your prospective tenants don’t ‘check out’ for any reason”
I’m not being confrontational here but this is another area where a landlord can get in trouble
CA law says that a landlord is supposed to rent to the first qualified tenant who applies – rejecting a tenant because they don’t ‘check out’ could put the landlord on shaky ground if the rejected applicant decides to push the issue – the rejected applicant might even claim discrimination if they are just looking for a lawsuit (not that we live in a litigious society or anything!)
to protect yourself from this you need to have a written list of what constitutes a qualified tenant – I never provided this list to an applicant but I had it available if the issue ever came up
another way to protect yourself is to NEVER tell an applicant that they are the first person to apply
-
AuthorPosts