Sorry, I meant Zillow, lol.
Sorry, I meant Zillow, lol.
Sorry, I meant Zillow, lol.
Sorry, I meant Zillow, lol.
Sorry, I meant Zillow, lol.
You are right; I checked up a house we sold in 2006 and it shows a vertical drop of $73,000 in the last week. It had gone down by only $25,000 in about 2 years. I guess REO sales must be kicking in to the valuation algorithm. If the trend continues, values may return to Y2K prices by year end!
You are right; I checked up a house we sold in 2006 and it shows a vertical drop of $73,000 in the last week. It had gone down by only $25,000 in about 2 years. I guess REO sales must be kicking in to the valuation algorithm. If the trend continues, values may return to Y2K prices by year end!
You are right; I checked up a house we sold in 2006 and it shows a vertical drop of $73,000 in the last week. It had gone down by only $25,000 in about 2 years. I guess REO sales must be kicking in to the valuation algorithm. If the trend continues, values may return to Y2K prices by year end!
You are right; I checked up a house we sold in 2006 and it shows a vertical drop of $73,000 in the last week. It had gone down by only $25,000 in about 2 years. I guess REO sales must be kicking in to the valuation algorithm. If the trend continues, values may return to Y2K prices by year end!
You are right; I checked up a house we sold in 2006 and it shows a vertical drop of $73,000 in the last week. It had gone down by only $25,000 in about 2 years. I guess REO sales must be kicking in to the valuation algorithm. If the trend continues, values may return to Y2K prices by year end!
It’s better to think that you never had the $93K than you lost it……………
It’s better to think that you never had the $93K than you lost it……………
It’s better to think that you never had the $93K than you lost it……………
It’s better to think that you never had the $93K than you lost it……………