Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Your $ may soon not be yours to have
- This topic has 40 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by 4plexowner.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 13, 2010 at 11:26 PM #16909January 14, 2010 at 6:43 AM #502054investorParticipant
I don’t like to say this but 1 person in 100,000 understands even the basics of the federal reserve. It can be understood by reading “The creature from jekyyl island” but most people won’t bother. Simply put, the federal reserve is a private company whose major shareholders are unknown but probably own major shares in the largest financial houses in the US and europe (which is why the too big to fail nonsence comes into play), who the us government hands OUR money to, so the fed can give it back to congress to spend and CHARGES US INTEREST ON IT. That’s it. MBA’s, economists majors are clueless to this. If you want to understand the forces behind the movement towards a one world money/socialized government, it is the drive by these handfull of people to control the worlds money supply, which they can do under a strong central government, not a government with strong individual rights. The Bildeburg group, CFR, round table all are privy to this. Sounds like crazy conspiracy talk but educate yourself and try to prove me wrong. I dare you.
January 14, 2010 at 6:43 AM #502202investorParticipantI don’t like to say this but 1 person in 100,000 understands even the basics of the federal reserve. It can be understood by reading “The creature from jekyyl island” but most people won’t bother. Simply put, the federal reserve is a private company whose major shareholders are unknown but probably own major shares in the largest financial houses in the US and europe (which is why the too big to fail nonsence comes into play), who the us government hands OUR money to, so the fed can give it back to congress to spend and CHARGES US INTEREST ON IT. That’s it. MBA’s, economists majors are clueless to this. If you want to understand the forces behind the movement towards a one world money/socialized government, it is the drive by these handfull of people to control the worlds money supply, which they can do under a strong central government, not a government with strong individual rights. The Bildeburg group, CFR, round table all are privy to this. Sounds like crazy conspiracy talk but educate yourself and try to prove me wrong. I dare you.
January 14, 2010 at 6:43 AM #502946investorParticipantI don’t like to say this but 1 person in 100,000 understands even the basics of the federal reserve. It can be understood by reading “The creature from jekyyl island” but most people won’t bother. Simply put, the federal reserve is a private company whose major shareholders are unknown but probably own major shares in the largest financial houses in the US and europe (which is why the too big to fail nonsence comes into play), who the us government hands OUR money to, so the fed can give it back to congress to spend and CHARGES US INTEREST ON IT. That’s it. MBA’s, economists majors are clueless to this. If you want to understand the forces behind the movement towards a one world money/socialized government, it is the drive by these handfull of people to control the worlds money supply, which they can do under a strong central government, not a government with strong individual rights. The Bildeburg group, CFR, round table all are privy to this. Sounds like crazy conspiracy talk but educate yourself and try to prove me wrong. I dare you.
January 14, 2010 at 6:43 AM #502695investorParticipantI don’t like to say this but 1 person in 100,000 understands even the basics of the federal reserve. It can be understood by reading “The creature from jekyyl island” but most people won’t bother. Simply put, the federal reserve is a private company whose major shareholders are unknown but probably own major shares in the largest financial houses in the US and europe (which is why the too big to fail nonsence comes into play), who the us government hands OUR money to, so the fed can give it back to congress to spend and CHARGES US INTEREST ON IT. That’s it. MBA’s, economists majors are clueless to this. If you want to understand the forces behind the movement towards a one world money/socialized government, it is the drive by these handfull of people to control the worlds money supply, which they can do under a strong central government, not a government with strong individual rights. The Bildeburg group, CFR, round table all are privy to this. Sounds like crazy conspiracy talk but educate yourself and try to prove me wrong. I dare you.
January 14, 2010 at 6:43 AM #502601investorParticipantI don’t like to say this but 1 person in 100,000 understands even the basics of the federal reserve. It can be understood by reading “The creature from jekyyl island” but most people won’t bother. Simply put, the federal reserve is a private company whose major shareholders are unknown but probably own major shares in the largest financial houses in the US and europe (which is why the too big to fail nonsence comes into play), who the us government hands OUR money to, so the fed can give it back to congress to spend and CHARGES US INTEREST ON IT. That’s it. MBA’s, economists majors are clueless to this. If you want to understand the forces behind the movement towards a one world money/socialized government, it is the drive by these handfull of people to control the worlds money supply, which they can do under a strong central government, not a government with strong individual rights. The Bildeburg group, CFR, round table all are privy to this. Sounds like crazy conspiracy talk but educate yourself and try to prove me wrong. I dare you.
January 14, 2010 at 11:10 PM #502268TexasLineParticipantIn all due respect, the point of the article was not about most people not understanding the Fed Reserve or the fact that powerful people have grand schemes to control the financial system, although I believe it all.
But rather that new rules and laws may be coming our way very soon that inhibit, restrict, if not forbid access to retirement/401’s etc. accounts.
A “Hope” and “Change” in the system that might indicate that the Govt itself fears a run on the banks.
January 14, 2010 at 11:10 PM #503162TexasLineParticipantIn all due respect, the point of the article was not about most people not understanding the Fed Reserve or the fact that powerful people have grand schemes to control the financial system, although I believe it all.
But rather that new rules and laws may be coming our way very soon that inhibit, restrict, if not forbid access to retirement/401’s etc. accounts.
A “Hope” and “Change” in the system that might indicate that the Govt itself fears a run on the banks.
January 14, 2010 at 11:10 PM #502416TexasLineParticipantIn all due respect, the point of the article was not about most people not understanding the Fed Reserve or the fact that powerful people have grand schemes to control the financial system, although I believe it all.
But rather that new rules and laws may be coming our way very soon that inhibit, restrict, if not forbid access to retirement/401’s etc. accounts.
A “Hope” and “Change” in the system that might indicate that the Govt itself fears a run on the banks.
January 14, 2010 at 11:10 PM #502910TexasLineParticipantIn all due respect, the point of the article was not about most people not understanding the Fed Reserve or the fact that powerful people have grand schemes to control the financial system, although I believe it all.
But rather that new rules and laws may be coming our way very soon that inhibit, restrict, if not forbid access to retirement/401’s etc. accounts.
A “Hope” and “Change” in the system that might indicate that the Govt itself fears a run on the banks.
January 14, 2010 at 11:10 PM #502817TexasLineParticipantIn all due respect, the point of the article was not about most people not understanding the Fed Reserve or the fact that powerful people have grand schemes to control the financial system, although I believe it all.
But rather that new rules and laws may be coming our way very soon that inhibit, restrict, if not forbid access to retirement/401’s etc. accounts.
A “Hope” and “Change” in the system that might indicate that the Govt itself fears a run on the banks.
January 15, 2010 at 7:44 AM #502837investorParticipantTexasline. In re-reading my note, I owe you an apology. I didn’t mean that you needed to educate yourself, rather it was meant as a broad statement to all reading the blog about picking up the book, reading it and giving back ideas that might give me additional insight into these issues. More to your point, when anyone “sees” the big picture, one is less likely to trust their retirement in a 401K and rather invest in investment real estate that cash flows.I’ve stopped putting my money into a simple IRA and I’m looking to get out of all debt and then buy commercial real estate that cash flows. I’m afraid that most people who buy property as investments in san diego do so for capital gains and not cash flow. Not being able to get to your 401K money is just another reason not to use a 401 K as your retirement vehicle. Again, sorry if my comment was taken as a criticism.
January 15, 2010 at 7:44 AM #503182investorParticipantTexasline. In re-reading my note, I owe you an apology. I didn’t mean that you needed to educate yourself, rather it was meant as a broad statement to all reading the blog about picking up the book, reading it and giving back ideas that might give me additional insight into these issues. More to your point, when anyone “sees” the big picture, one is less likely to trust their retirement in a 401K and rather invest in investment real estate that cash flows.I’ve stopped putting my money into a simple IRA and I’m looking to get out of all debt and then buy commercial real estate that cash flows. I’m afraid that most people who buy property as investments in san diego do so for capital gains and not cash flow. Not being able to get to your 401K money is just another reason not to use a 401 K as your retirement vehicle. Again, sorry if my comment was taken as a criticism.
January 15, 2010 at 7:44 AM #502930investorParticipantTexasline. In re-reading my note, I owe you an apology. I didn’t mean that you needed to educate yourself, rather it was meant as a broad statement to all reading the blog about picking up the book, reading it and giving back ideas that might give me additional insight into these issues. More to your point, when anyone “sees” the big picture, one is less likely to trust their retirement in a 401K and rather invest in investment real estate that cash flows.I’ve stopped putting my money into a simple IRA and I’m looking to get out of all debt and then buy commercial real estate that cash flows. I’m afraid that most people who buy property as investments in san diego do so for capital gains and not cash flow. Not being able to get to your 401K money is just another reason not to use a 401 K as your retirement vehicle. Again, sorry if my comment was taken as a criticism.
January 15, 2010 at 7:44 AM #502288investorParticipantTexasline. In re-reading my note, I owe you an apology. I didn’t mean that you needed to educate yourself, rather it was meant as a broad statement to all reading the blog about picking up the book, reading it and giving back ideas that might give me additional insight into these issues. More to your point, when anyone “sees” the big picture, one is less likely to trust their retirement in a 401K and rather invest in investment real estate that cash flows.I’ve stopped putting my money into a simple IRA and I’m looking to get out of all debt and then buy commercial real estate that cash flows. I’m afraid that most people who buy property as investments in san diego do so for capital gains and not cash flow. Not being able to get to your 401K money is just another reason not to use a 401 K as your retirement vehicle. Again, sorry if my comment was taken as a criticism.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.