You piggies make me sick.

[patientlywaiting]

sdnerd wrote:
It’s all connected, but as it works it’s way in the price declines will probably decrease.

*

No, that’s not how it worked in the 90s. Don’t delude yourself that the higher cost neighborhoods will be insulated.

The percentage decline was the same for all areas. The difference is the timing of the percentage price drops, and then the rate of appreciation afterwards.

Bugs is right…. It’s all connected. If you look at it over a longer horizon, the percentage declines and appreciation were the same for nearly all neighborhoods. (Downtown SD was different because the CCDC was at work pumping massive amounts of redevelopment money into the area.)

[drunkle]

huh. whiny bastards crying about their really really dumb mistakes deserve to be laughed at and vultured. and they still dont get it. retards probably have no problem with crooks like tanzillo making off with millions on millions of dollars raping them, but instead blame the nerds who actually looked at the numbers and know how to add.

fuck you, dude. suffer your future as a bitter renter. the label really applies.

[drunkle]

huh. whiny bastards crying about their really really dumb mistakes deserve to be laughed at and vultured. and they still dont get it. retards probably have no problem with crooks like tanzillo making off with millions on millions of dollars raping them, but instead blame the nerds who actually looked at the numbers and know how to add.

fuck you, dude. suffer your future as a bitter renter. the label really applies.

[drunkle]

huh. whiny bastards crying about their really really dumb mistakes deserve to be laughed at and vultured. and they still dont get it. retards probably have no problem with crooks like tanzillo making off with millions on millions of dollars raping them, but instead blame the nerds who actually looked at the numbers and know how to add.

fuck you, dude. suffer your future as a bitter renter. the label really applies.

[drunkle]

huh. whiny bastards crying about their really really dumb mistakes deserve to be laughed at and vultured. and they still dont get it. retards probably have no problem with crooks like tanzillo making off with millions on millions of dollars raping them, but instead blame the nerds who actually looked at the numbers and know how to add.

fuck you, dude. suffer your future as a bitter renter. the label really applies.

[drunkle]

huh. whiny bastards crying about their really really dumb mistakes deserve to be laughed at and vultured. and they still dont get it. retards probably have no problem with crooks like tanzillo making off with millions on millions of dollars raping them, but instead blame the nerds who actually looked at the numbers and know how to add.

fuck you, dude. suffer your future as a bitter renter. the label really applies.

[sdnerd]

re: patiently

Assuming Temecula falls 60%; you honestly believe homes in Rancho Santa Fe will as well?

Honestly? I’m curious as to your answer.

I don’t. Too few homes, too nice of an area, too many people wanting into that neighborhood. That’s just IMHO of course.

[sdnerd]

re: patiently

Assuming Temecula falls 60%; you honestly believe homes in Rancho Santa Fe will as well?

Honestly? I’m curious as to your answer.

I don’t. Too few homes, too nice of an area, too many people wanting into that neighborhood. That’s just IMHO of course.

[sdnerd]

re: patiently

Assuming Temecula falls 60%; you honestly believe homes in Rancho Santa Fe will as well?

Honestly? I’m curious as to your answer.

I don’t. Too few homes, too nice of an area, too many people wanting into that neighborhood. That’s just IMHO of course.

[sdnerd]

re: patiently

Assuming Temecula falls 60%; you honestly believe homes in Rancho Santa Fe will as well?

Honestly? I’m curious as to your answer.

I don’t. Too few homes, too nice of an area, too many people wanting into that neighborhood. That’s just IMHO of course.

[sdnerd]

re: patiently

Assuming Temecula falls 60%; you honestly believe homes in Rancho Santa Fe will as well?

Honestly? I’m curious as to your answer.

I don’t. Too few homes, too nice of an area, too many people wanting into that neighborhood. That’s just IMHO of course.

[sdduuuude]

sdnerd. I think this graph may help explain your theory a little better. It isn’t because those ‘hoods are nicer, or because there are too many people wanting to live in them, it is because the bubble wasn’t as pronounced in the higher-priced areas. The speculative ferver was less intense. Thus, there is less unwinding to do.

http://piggington.com/images/dec07hpitiersreallt.gif

[sdduuuude]

sdnerd. I think this graph may help explain your theory a little better. It isn’t because those ‘hoods are nicer, or because there are too many people wanting to live in them, it is because the bubble wasn’t as pronounced in the higher-priced areas. The speculative ferver was less intense. Thus, there is less unwinding to do.

http://piggington.com/images/dec07hpitiersreallt.gif

[sdduuuude]

sdnerd. I think this graph may help explain your theory a little better. It isn’t because those ‘hoods are nicer, or because there are too many people wanting to live in them, it is because the bubble wasn’t as pronounced in the higher-priced areas. The speculative ferver was less intense. Thus, there is less unwinding to do.

http://piggington.com/images/dec07hpitiersreallt.gif

[sdduuuude]

sdnerd. I think this graph may help explain your theory a little better. It isn’t because those ‘hoods are nicer, or because there are too many people wanting to live in them, it is because the bubble wasn’t as pronounced in the higher-priced areas. The speculative ferver was less intense. Thus, there is less unwinding to do.

http://piggington.com/images/dec07hpitiersreallt.gif

[Author]

Posts