- This topic has 380 replies, 43 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by
Multiplepropertyowner.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 13, 2008 at 10:47 PM #169597March 13, 2008 at 10:48 PM #169166
drunkle
Participanthuh. whiny bastards crying about their really really dumb mistakes deserve to be laughed at and vultured. and they still dont get it. retards probably have no problem with crooks like tanzillo making off with millions on millions of dollars raping them, but instead blame the nerds who actually looked at the numbers and know how to add.
fuck you, dude. suffer your future as a bitter renter. the label really applies.
March 13, 2008 at 10:48 PM #169499drunkle
Participanthuh. whiny bastards crying about their really really dumb mistakes deserve to be laughed at and vultured. and they still dont get it. retards probably have no problem with crooks like tanzillo making off with millions on millions of dollars raping them, but instead blame the nerds who actually looked at the numbers and know how to add.
fuck you, dude. suffer your future as a bitter renter. the label really applies.
March 13, 2008 at 10:48 PM #169503drunkle
Participanthuh. whiny bastards crying about their really really dumb mistakes deserve to be laughed at and vultured. and they still dont get it. retards probably have no problem with crooks like tanzillo making off with millions on millions of dollars raping them, but instead blame the nerds who actually looked at the numbers and know how to add.
fuck you, dude. suffer your future as a bitter renter. the label really applies.
March 13, 2008 at 10:48 PM #169525drunkle
Participanthuh. whiny bastards crying about their really really dumb mistakes deserve to be laughed at and vultured. and they still dont get it. retards probably have no problem with crooks like tanzillo making off with millions on millions of dollars raping them, but instead blame the nerds who actually looked at the numbers and know how to add.
fuck you, dude. suffer your future as a bitter renter. the label really applies.
March 13, 2008 at 10:48 PM #169602drunkle
Participanthuh. whiny bastards crying about their really really dumb mistakes deserve to be laughed at and vultured. and they still dont get it. retards probably have no problem with crooks like tanzillo making off with millions on millions of dollars raping them, but instead blame the nerds who actually looked at the numbers and know how to add.
fuck you, dude. suffer your future as a bitter renter. the label really applies.
March 13, 2008 at 11:04 PM #169187sdnerd
Participantre: patiently
Assuming Temecula falls 60%; you honestly believe homes in Rancho Santa Fe will as well?
Honestly? I’m curious as to your answer.
I don’t. Too few homes, too nice of an area, too many people wanting into that neighborhood. That’s just IMHO of course.
March 13, 2008 at 11:04 PM #169519sdnerd
Participantre: patiently
Assuming Temecula falls 60%; you honestly believe homes in Rancho Santa Fe will as well?
Honestly? I’m curious as to your answer.
I don’t. Too few homes, too nice of an area, too many people wanting into that neighborhood. That’s just IMHO of course.
March 13, 2008 at 11:04 PM #169521sdnerd
Participantre: patiently
Assuming Temecula falls 60%; you honestly believe homes in Rancho Santa Fe will as well?
Honestly? I’m curious as to your answer.
I don’t. Too few homes, too nice of an area, too many people wanting into that neighborhood. That’s just IMHO of course.
March 13, 2008 at 11:04 PM #169545sdnerd
Participantre: patiently
Assuming Temecula falls 60%; you honestly believe homes in Rancho Santa Fe will as well?
Honestly? I’m curious as to your answer.
I don’t. Too few homes, too nice of an area, too many people wanting into that neighborhood. That’s just IMHO of course.
March 13, 2008 at 11:04 PM #169622sdnerd
Participantre: patiently
Assuming Temecula falls 60%; you honestly believe homes in Rancho Santa Fe will as well?
Honestly? I’m curious as to your answer.
I don’t. Too few homes, too nice of an area, too many people wanting into that neighborhood. That’s just IMHO of course.
March 13, 2008 at 11:10 PM #169203sdduuuude
Participantsdnerd. I think this graph may help explain your theory a little better. It isn’t because those ‘hoods are nicer, or because there are too many people wanting to live in them, it is because the bubble wasn’t as pronounced in the higher-priced areas. The speculative ferver was less intense. Thus, there is less unwinding to do.
March 13, 2008 at 11:10 PM #169534sdduuuude
Participantsdnerd. I think this graph may help explain your theory a little better. It isn’t because those ‘hoods are nicer, or because there are too many people wanting to live in them, it is because the bubble wasn’t as pronounced in the higher-priced areas. The speculative ferver was less intense. Thus, there is less unwinding to do.
March 13, 2008 at 11:10 PM #169537sdduuuude
Participantsdnerd. I think this graph may help explain your theory a little better. It isn’t because those ‘hoods are nicer, or because there are too many people wanting to live in them, it is because the bubble wasn’t as pronounced in the higher-priced areas. The speculative ferver was less intense. Thus, there is less unwinding to do.
March 13, 2008 at 11:10 PM #169560sdduuuude
Participantsdnerd. I think this graph may help explain your theory a little better. It isn’t because those ‘hoods are nicer, or because there are too many people wanting to live in them, it is because the bubble wasn’t as pronounced in the higher-priced areas. The speculative ferver was less intense. Thus, there is less unwinding to do.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.