Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Worst case scenario for an underfunded HOA
- This topic has 80 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by EconProf.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 18, 2008 at 11:20 AM #224689June 18, 2008 at 11:27 AM #224852nostradamusParticipant
That’s true. I guess in that case I’d look at the percentage of FB’s as a function of the number of units total. Then I’d look at the length of time most people have lived in the complex. People who have been there long are IMO less likely to walk. If you have a good portion of the complex being long-term residents, I’d say things are pretty stable.
I’m not sure how to find out online how long people have been living there, so it’s a good argument for going there and talking to people.
June 18, 2008 at 11:27 AM #224866nostradamusParticipantThat’s true. I guess in that case I’d look at the percentage of FB’s as a function of the number of units total. Then I’d look at the length of time most people have lived in the complex. People who have been there long are IMO less likely to walk. If you have a good portion of the complex being long-term residents, I’d say things are pretty stable.
I’m not sure how to find out online how long people have been living there, so it’s a good argument for going there and talking to people.
June 18, 2008 at 11:27 AM #224805nostradamusParticipantThat’s true. I guess in that case I’d look at the percentage of FB’s as a function of the number of units total. Then I’d look at the length of time most people have lived in the complex. People who have been there long are IMO less likely to walk. If you have a good portion of the complex being long-term residents, I’d say things are pretty stable.
I’m not sure how to find out online how long people have been living there, so it’s a good argument for going there and talking to people.
June 18, 2008 at 11:27 AM #224699nostradamusParticipantThat’s true. I guess in that case I’d look at the percentage of FB’s as a function of the number of units total. Then I’d look at the length of time most people have lived in the complex. People who have been there long are IMO less likely to walk. If you have a good portion of the complex being long-term residents, I’d say things are pretty stable.
I’m not sure how to find out online how long people have been living there, so it’s a good argument for going there and talking to people.
June 18, 2008 at 11:27 AM #224822nostradamusParticipantThat’s true. I guess in that case I’d look at the percentage of FB’s as a function of the number of units total. Then I’d look at the length of time most people have lived in the complex. People who have been there long are IMO less likely to walk. If you have a good portion of the complex being long-term residents, I’d say things are pretty stable.
I’m not sure how to find out online how long people have been living there, so it’s a good argument for going there and talking to people.
June 18, 2008 at 12:55 PM #224774AnonymousGuestI know of Co-op complexes on the east coast that have gone bankrupt. The Co-op is allowed to borrow so I think that is different than the HOA. I see no reason why the condo HOA could not go bankrupt. Of course I am not sure if declaring BK will encourage the utilities companies to restore service or get a leaking roof replaced.
I know it is tempting to buy some of the condo conversion projects as cash flow investments. However, who are going to be the renters in the complex? What condition will your investment be in one year later. Stories I have heard about owners that have owned in complexes that have gone section 8 are not good.
June 18, 2008 at 12:55 PM #224880AnonymousGuestI know of Co-op complexes on the east coast that have gone bankrupt. The Co-op is allowed to borrow so I think that is different than the HOA. I see no reason why the condo HOA could not go bankrupt. Of course I am not sure if declaring BK will encourage the utilities companies to restore service or get a leaking roof replaced.
I know it is tempting to buy some of the condo conversion projects as cash flow investments. However, who are going to be the renters in the complex? What condition will your investment be in one year later. Stories I have heard about owners that have owned in complexes that have gone section 8 are not good.
June 18, 2008 at 12:55 PM #224894AnonymousGuestI know of Co-op complexes on the east coast that have gone bankrupt. The Co-op is allowed to borrow so I think that is different than the HOA. I see no reason why the condo HOA could not go bankrupt. Of course I am not sure if declaring BK will encourage the utilities companies to restore service or get a leaking roof replaced.
I know it is tempting to buy some of the condo conversion projects as cash flow investments. However, who are going to be the renters in the complex? What condition will your investment be in one year later. Stories I have heard about owners that have owned in complexes that have gone section 8 are not good.
June 18, 2008 at 12:55 PM #224942AnonymousGuestI know of Co-op complexes on the east coast that have gone bankrupt. The Co-op is allowed to borrow so I think that is different than the HOA. I see no reason why the condo HOA could not go bankrupt. Of course I am not sure if declaring BK will encourage the utilities companies to restore service or get a leaking roof replaced.
I know it is tempting to buy some of the condo conversion projects as cash flow investments. However, who are going to be the renters in the complex? What condition will your investment be in one year later. Stories I have heard about owners that have owned in complexes that have gone section 8 are not good.
June 18, 2008 at 12:55 PM #224927AnonymousGuestI know of Co-op complexes on the east coast that have gone bankrupt. The Co-op is allowed to borrow so I think that is different than the HOA. I see no reason why the condo HOA could not go bankrupt. Of course I am not sure if declaring BK will encourage the utilities companies to restore service or get a leaking roof replaced.
I know it is tempting to buy some of the condo conversion projects as cash flow investments. However, who are going to be the renters in the complex? What condition will your investment be in one year later. Stories I have heard about owners that have owned in complexes that have gone section 8 are not good.
June 18, 2008 at 1:27 PM #224951CoronitaParticipantA friend who mentioned section 8 rentals are actually pretty decent, because at least the tenant is obligated to keep the place relatively orderly. I can’t comment, because I’m not section 8 landlord. Anyone? (Recordsclerk, you there?)
June 18, 2008 at 1:27 PM #224967CoronitaParticipantA friend who mentioned section 8 rentals are actually pretty decent, because at least the tenant is obligated to keep the place relatively orderly. I can’t comment, because I’m not section 8 landlord. Anyone? (Recordsclerk, you there?)
June 18, 2008 at 1:27 PM #224921CoronitaParticipantA friend who mentioned section 8 rentals are actually pretty decent, because at least the tenant is obligated to keep the place relatively orderly. I can’t comment, because I’m not section 8 landlord. Anyone? (Recordsclerk, you there?)
June 18, 2008 at 1:27 PM #224907CoronitaParticipantA friend who mentioned section 8 rentals are actually pretty decent, because at least the tenant is obligated to keep the place relatively orderly. I can’t comment, because I’m not section 8 landlord. Anyone? (Recordsclerk, you there?)
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.