- This topic has 49 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 8 months ago by CostaMesa.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 17, 2007 at 2:51 PM #45703February 17, 2007 at 5:09 PM #45707kewpParticipant
Assuming you are correct, I would think the ‘urban core’ areas would increase in value (fundamental, not bubble) and the outlying areas would decrease.
However, that is assuming everything else remains the same. It’s just as likely new modes of transportation or working will become available that lower the costs associated with commuting.
February 17, 2007 at 7:13 PM #45709patbParticipantAt first they wanted to lay off as many people as they could in a way that would eliminate their ability to collect un employment or require severance pay. They would basically put everyone on a performance review period and force them to meet a specific target, something around 20-million in sells. Since not a single person in the company is meeting these targets, they couldn’t do it this way.
——-
wow
this is so totally “Second prize is a set of steak knives”
February 17, 2007 at 11:09 PM #45714JWM in SDParticipant….and coffee is for closers…
February 18, 2007 at 4:44 AM #45716BikeRiderParticipantEveryone blames Bush for everything that goes wrong. Bush didn’t put a gun to anyone’s head and MAKE THEM take out loans, buy big expensive houses, buy Hummers, buy BMWs, get pedicures, yada, yada. GREED. All of these people that have been kidding themsleves that they could afford the big house, buy the investment property or buy all the other CRAP that they think will make them happy and look like they are somebody, and really couldn’t afford it, AND didn’t have an exit strategy, are now going to suffer (How’s that for a run on sentence?). They will get a reality check. Actaully, I HOPE they get a reality check. When things go wrong, most people now days want to blame somebody else for their stupidity. Sub prime lenders are BAD, everyone knows that. But they don’t force people to take out loans. The people made their own choice. I don’t feel sorry for them one little bit. Same for people with large credit card debt. Those people decided all on their own that they would give themselves a loan (using credit cards) to buy crap. Now they have large amounts owed on cards and I bet they can’t even figure out where the money went. Probably going out to dinner. LostCat, of course a business is going to look out for itself. The days are gone where someone could retire from a place. You are just a number in most companies and they could give a hoot about you. They want production, period. I don’t know where it is all headed really. Production…..we should all slow down and enjoy life a little more.
February 18, 2007 at 5:23 AM #45717patbParticipantnobody made these people sign up for these loans
but there was a failure of regulation.
Why did the Treasury issue regs increasing underwriting standards last year
when they should have done that 5 years ago.why were unlicensed brokers allowed to handle mortgage products?
the fed could have cracked down insisting that brokers be licensed
the same way as stock brokers are and we’d have seen far fewer
liar loansconsumers are stupid, but the money tribe has been total evil.
Habitat ofr humanity sells you a home with 0% interest mortgage,
and the weevils show up with acash back re-fi that
sets them up for a rate they can’t handle.February 18, 2007 at 8:22 AM #45721LostCatParticipantWMC is owned by GE. I’ll keep you posted this coming week. I’ll find out if AKA Chris has heard anything new.
February 20, 2007 at 3:00 AM #45804BikeRiderParticipantThe Blame game. The majority of Americans appear to immediately blame someone else for their own mistakes. I find it very disgusting. People think the Government should be doing everything for them. Our Government is a screwed up mess. YOU NEED TO TAKE CARE OF YOURSELF. I also suggest people read John G. Miller’s book ‘QBQ’.
February 20, 2007 at 6:00 AM #45805patbParticipantpersonal accountability does not excuse fraud.
when you sell a mortgage product waving around the
teaser rate and bury the hidden fees, the escalation clauses and
the penalty issues inside the fine print, it does verge on fraud.when you sell a mortgage the end user can’t afford, by all
measures of financial reasonability, and you do it solely to generate
a fee for the bank and broker, it is a fraud.110% LTV? 62% NI? Those are frauds by everyone against everyone.
February 20, 2007 at 4:24 PM #45807The-ShovelerParticipantA Rich Dad Quote,
This quote was from Robert Kiyosaki (Rich Dad) from an artical on Yahoo Finance.
Where Deflation Does Its Damage
In a deflationary market, the value of your home can drop. If the value drops, the bank may call in your loan. Even if you’ve never missed a payment, and even if you’re ahead on the payment schedule, the bank can call in your loan if they feel the value of the property is lower than the loan amount.
For example, say you buy a house for $100,000 and put 20 percent down and borrow $80,000. If the market deflates and the value of your home drops to $70,000 (because everyone else is selling their homes to get out of debt), the lender may ask you to pay the $80,000 you owe immediately.
If such deflation happens, cash will become king. There will be half-price sales on BMWs, expensive restaurants will close, and people will be out of work. And anybody who caters to people with dumb money will be in trouble. As I said before, deflation is much worse than inflation.
February 20, 2007 at 5:00 PM #45856AnonymousGuestGreat site, found it on Google after searching for “WMC subprime”.
In the debate on who is to blame, the lender or the consumer, the answer is both.
I worked for a subprime lender and then my conscious got the best of me. I quit after a broker asked me what fees he legally could make-up to charge his borrower.
It is true that these subprime lenders offer loans with horrible terms that will most likely put the borrower in default. But I have never seen so many stupid consumers who are more than happy to be suckered in.
Look, I got great credit and I know I can go out there and some dealer will let me lease a Lexus LS. The thing is I know I leasing an LS is not in my best interest so I don’t do it. I know that the payments will overstretch me.
A lot of these borrowers are in on the scam. They set up fake employments (using a family member) to help them get a loan. They knowingly overstate their income. And why? Because they saw there house was worth more, so they want to take money out so they can buy a BMW 7 series or an Escalade. They continue refinancing and refinancing every time they get equity. I do not feel one bit of sympathy for these people. They get what they deserve.
The real problem in the mortgage industry is not lenders, it’s the brokers. Mortgage brokers are the shadiest most greediest people ever. Since my time dealing with mortgage brokers, I have come to look at attorneys as saints.
The government needs to regulate mortgage brokers with the same zeal they regulate securities brokers. To sell stock one must be licensed and then have the SEC watch over you . What do you need to do to be a mortgage broker? Work under someone who took some classes at community college. That’s it. During the boom, all these morons, criminals, con-men, high school dropouts all became mortgage brokers. They couldn’t care about compliance or the regulations and why should they. There is no institution like the SEC to watch over them. And what happens if a shady mortgage broker gets caught? They just reopen under their wife’s name after sending her to community college.
February 20, 2007 at 7:37 PM #45863patbParticipanti agree a lot of the people getting foreclosed are
childish, stupid, immature, greedy, stupid, did i say STUPID,
but, the brokers didn’t care, it wasn’t their money.HSBC, etc didn’t care either, they were selling the paper to
merrill who sold it to pension funds etc.had the MBS market been tightly regulated, you would see
the hazard held to the issuers.February 23, 2007 at 7:33 PM #46087AnonymousGuestAs of 2 weeks ago, the day New Century’s stock plunged over 35% of its market value, Wall Street is no longer buying loan pools, or forward commitments for that matter. GE Money (dba WMC) is prepared to carry the next 6 months on its books (or however long it may take till the market opens again which it will) and is absolutely committed to riding this out. If we take another look at the top 25 lenders in the space in 90 days, we will see another 17 of them missing, likely selling at fire sales for pennies on the dollar. Without a market going forward to sell loans, very few companies can survive
As for the poorly spelled and worded rumor posted above, I cannot verify it. Considering the current environment, shutting down must be considered as an option. But I would suggest that it is in the interest of competitors to have others take their eye off the ball. Who do you believe?
February 25, 2007 at 9:06 AM #46143AnonymousGuestDon’t Panic!
WMC is not going to shut the doors! Not sure who this “Chris” is, but clearly not a person who is in the know! His or her comments are clearly ridiculous and irrational at best.
WMC must right size, as does every other player that will survive this market. Don’t be surprised if GE finds the opportunity here and emerges as the market leader in Q3.
I promise you, that whoever “Chris” is, they have no idea what they are talking about!
February 25, 2007 at 5:30 PM #46187AnonymousGuestTrust me! Lostcat does NOT have good info. Not one thing in his commentary, other than the spelling of WMC, is correct. Everything that “Chris” is telling him is absolute garbage! Of all the rumors I’ve heard so far, this one is the most ridiculous!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.