Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Will the Fed let Lehman Fail?
- This topic has 75 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by cr.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 10, 2008 at 3:19 PM #268664September 10, 2008 at 3:25 PM #268953scaredyclassicParticipant
maybe there is no rhyme or reason to any human action in the universe. Kind of comforting to beleive in karma, or hell, or nay sort of ultimate regulatory agency, but probably there’s nothing there. Just us, alone. And moreover, the guy doing well probably doesn’t even remotely perceive himself as seeing himself as “screwing” anyone over. What does he think. probably something like whatever the mission statement is….and is there really any divine retribution in store for someone playing financial games? I don’t know. i tend to doubt it…
September 10, 2008 at 3:25 PM #268982scaredyclassicParticipantmaybe there is no rhyme or reason to any human action in the universe. Kind of comforting to beleive in karma, or hell, or nay sort of ultimate regulatory agency, but probably there’s nothing there. Just us, alone. And moreover, the guy doing well probably doesn’t even remotely perceive himself as seeing himself as “screwing” anyone over. What does he think. probably something like whatever the mission statement is….and is there really any divine retribution in store for someone playing financial games? I don’t know. i tend to doubt it…
September 10, 2008 at 3:25 PM #268669scaredyclassicParticipantmaybe there is no rhyme or reason to any human action in the universe. Kind of comforting to beleive in karma, or hell, or nay sort of ultimate regulatory agency, but probably there’s nothing there. Just us, alone. And moreover, the guy doing well probably doesn’t even remotely perceive himself as seeing himself as “screwing” anyone over. What does he think. probably something like whatever the mission statement is….and is there really any divine retribution in store for someone playing financial games? I don’t know. i tend to doubt it…
September 10, 2008 at 3:25 PM #268905scaredyclassicParticipantmaybe there is no rhyme or reason to any human action in the universe. Kind of comforting to beleive in karma, or hell, or nay sort of ultimate regulatory agency, but probably there’s nothing there. Just us, alone. And moreover, the guy doing well probably doesn’t even remotely perceive himself as seeing himself as “screwing” anyone over. What does he think. probably something like whatever the mission statement is….and is there really any divine retribution in store for someone playing financial games? I don’t know. i tend to doubt it…
September 10, 2008 at 3:25 PM #268894scaredyclassicParticipantmaybe there is no rhyme or reason to any human action in the universe. Kind of comforting to beleive in karma, or hell, or nay sort of ultimate regulatory agency, but probably there’s nothing there. Just us, alone. And moreover, the guy doing well probably doesn’t even remotely perceive himself as seeing himself as “screwing” anyone over. What does he think. probably something like whatever the mission statement is….and is there really any divine retribution in store for someone playing financial games? I don’t know. i tend to doubt it…
September 10, 2008 at 4:32 PM #268919pedroconParticipantI’m sure the upper managers at Lame men have more money than me although I’m doing just fine thank you. I’m not talking about them personally, but their performance running Lame men. If you were a shareholder of Lame men you’d probably be pretty unimpressed with their performance. Pretty pathetic job for these over educated incompetents. Maybe they should hire some 23 year old guy with an associates degree. I mean how much worse could he really do? I think their stock is down like 85%.
September 10, 2008 at 4:32 PM #268930pedroconParticipantI’m sure the upper managers at Lame men have more money than me although I’m doing just fine thank you. I’m not talking about them personally, but their performance running Lame men. If you were a shareholder of Lame men you’d probably be pretty unimpressed with their performance. Pretty pathetic job for these over educated incompetents. Maybe they should hire some 23 year old guy with an associates degree. I mean how much worse could he really do? I think their stock is down like 85%.
September 10, 2008 at 4:32 PM #269006pedroconParticipantI’m sure the upper managers at Lame men have more money than me although I’m doing just fine thank you. I’m not talking about them personally, but their performance running Lame men. If you were a shareholder of Lame men you’d probably be pretty unimpressed with their performance. Pretty pathetic job for these over educated incompetents. Maybe they should hire some 23 year old guy with an associates degree. I mean how much worse could he really do? I think their stock is down like 85%.
September 10, 2008 at 4:32 PM #268694pedroconParticipantI’m sure the upper managers at Lame men have more money than me although I’m doing just fine thank you. I’m not talking about them personally, but their performance running Lame men. If you were a shareholder of Lame men you’d probably be pretty unimpressed with their performance. Pretty pathetic job for these over educated incompetents. Maybe they should hire some 23 year old guy with an associates degree. I mean how much worse could he really do? I think their stock is down like 85%.
September 10, 2008 at 4:32 PM #268978pedroconParticipantI’m sure the upper managers at Lame men have more money than me although I’m doing just fine thank you. I’m not talking about them personally, but their performance running Lame men. If you were a shareholder of Lame men you’d probably be pretty unimpressed with their performance. Pretty pathetic job for these over educated incompetents. Maybe they should hire some 23 year old guy with an associates degree. I mean how much worse could he really do? I think their stock is down like 85%.
September 10, 2008 at 6:53 PM #268949crParticipantRight.
And to answer the original question about bailing out Lehman?
I don’t know, but they bailed out Bear Sterns and Frannie, but the latter was a problem caused by the Government. Still, doesn’t mean they should have bailed them out, especially when Paulson said institutions must be allowed to fail.
So then I ask myself, why wouldn’t they bailout Lehman?
One, they really can’t afford to b/c they’ll need to bailout WaMu. Two, Lehman is probably not regarded as critical to the market as Frannie, but then they’re not all that different from Bear and they sponsored that bailout so who knows.
September 10, 2008 at 6:53 PM #269008crParticipantRight.
And to answer the original question about bailing out Lehman?
I don’t know, but they bailed out Bear Sterns and Frannie, but the latter was a problem caused by the Government. Still, doesn’t mean they should have bailed them out, especially when Paulson said institutions must be allowed to fail.
So then I ask myself, why wouldn’t they bailout Lehman?
One, they really can’t afford to b/c they’ll need to bailout WaMu. Two, Lehman is probably not regarded as critical to the market as Frannie, but then they’re not all that different from Bear and they sponsored that bailout so who knows.
September 10, 2008 at 6:53 PM #269035crParticipantRight.
And to answer the original question about bailing out Lehman?
I don’t know, but they bailed out Bear Sterns and Frannie, but the latter was a problem caused by the Government. Still, doesn’t mean they should have bailed them out, especially when Paulson said institutions must be allowed to fail.
So then I ask myself, why wouldn’t they bailout Lehman?
One, they really can’t afford to b/c they’ll need to bailout WaMu. Two, Lehman is probably not regarded as critical to the market as Frannie, but then they’re not all that different from Bear and they sponsored that bailout so who knows.
September 10, 2008 at 6:53 PM #268962crParticipantRight.
And to answer the original question about bailing out Lehman?
I don’t know, but they bailed out Bear Sterns and Frannie, but the latter was a problem caused by the Government. Still, doesn’t mean they should have bailed them out, especially when Paulson said institutions must be allowed to fail.
So then I ask myself, why wouldn’t they bailout Lehman?
One, they really can’t afford to b/c they’ll need to bailout WaMu. Two, Lehman is probably not regarded as critical to the market as Frannie, but then they’re not all that different from Bear and they sponsored that bailout so who knows.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.