- This topic has 45 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by barnaby33.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 7, 2009 at 9:07 AM #342906February 7, 2009 at 9:43 AM #342921nostradamusParticipant
As of this January I’m break-even rent/own. Been here 10 years and my calcs are based on what I was paying in rent 10 years ago when I bought. Kinda wish I sold at the peak but oh well, I still live here.
February 7, 2009 at 9:43 AM #343046nostradamusParticipantAs of this January I’m break-even rent/own. Been here 10 years and my calcs are based on what I was paying in rent 10 years ago when I bought. Kinda wish I sold at the peak but oh well, I still live here.
February 7, 2009 at 9:43 AM #342948nostradamusParticipantAs of this January I’m break-even rent/own. Been here 10 years and my calcs are based on what I was paying in rent 10 years ago when I bought. Kinda wish I sold at the peak but oh well, I still live here.
February 7, 2009 at 9:43 AM #342489nostradamusParticipantAs of this January I’m break-even rent/own. Been here 10 years and my calcs are based on what I was paying in rent 10 years ago when I bought. Kinda wish I sold at the peak but oh well, I still live here.
February 7, 2009 at 9:43 AM #342813nostradamusParticipantAs of this January I’m break-even rent/own. Been here 10 years and my calcs are based on what I was paying in rent 10 years ago when I bought. Kinda wish I sold at the peak but oh well, I still live here.
February 7, 2009 at 10:17 AM #342500NotCrankyParticipantThe problem is that it isn’t as easy to get into a better own vs rent scenario without buying something. Of course timing is important…but so is time.
How about the people who say you are leaving your equity “trapped” in your house instead of liberating it and putting it in higher return investments? Lets see,I could have gotten out that 250k that I have “lost” in equity and be upside down with an increased monthly payment and have a losing stock portfolio, if I had only liberated it earlier.
Lots of people who put down large payments in the bubble got it by “untrapping equity” in the bubble.Many would have been better off staying in the affordable house and watching the equity swing back down.Easy come easy go.
February 7, 2009 at 10:17 AM #342931NotCrankyParticipantThe problem is that it isn’t as easy to get into a better own vs rent scenario without buying something. Of course timing is important…but so is time.
How about the people who say you are leaving your equity “trapped” in your house instead of liberating it and putting it in higher return investments? Lets see,I could have gotten out that 250k that I have “lost” in equity and be upside down with an increased monthly payment and have a losing stock portfolio, if I had only liberated it earlier.
Lots of people who put down large payments in the bubble got it by “untrapping equity” in the bubble.Many would have been better off staying in the affordable house and watching the equity swing back down.Easy come easy go.
February 7, 2009 at 10:17 AM #342822NotCrankyParticipantThe problem is that it isn’t as easy to get into a better own vs rent scenario without buying something. Of course timing is important…but so is time.
How about the people who say you are leaving your equity “trapped” in your house instead of liberating it and putting it in higher return investments? Lets see,I could have gotten out that 250k that I have “lost” in equity and be upside down with an increased monthly payment and have a losing stock portfolio, if I had only liberated it earlier.
Lots of people who put down large payments in the bubble got it by “untrapping equity” in the bubble.Many would have been better off staying in the affordable house and watching the equity swing back down.Easy come easy go.
February 7, 2009 at 10:17 AM #342958NotCrankyParticipantThe problem is that it isn’t as easy to get into a better own vs rent scenario without buying something. Of course timing is important…but so is time.
How about the people who say you are leaving your equity “trapped” in your house instead of liberating it and putting it in higher return investments? Lets see,I could have gotten out that 250k that I have “lost” in equity and be upside down with an increased monthly payment and have a losing stock portfolio, if I had only liberated it earlier.
Lots of people who put down large payments in the bubble got it by “untrapping equity” in the bubble.Many would have been better off staying in the affordable house and watching the equity swing back down.Easy come easy go.
February 7, 2009 at 10:17 AM #343056NotCrankyParticipantThe problem is that it isn’t as easy to get into a better own vs rent scenario without buying something. Of course timing is important…but so is time.
How about the people who say you are leaving your equity “trapped” in your house instead of liberating it and putting it in higher return investments? Lets see,I could have gotten out that 250k that I have “lost” in equity and be upside down with an increased monthly payment and have a losing stock portfolio, if I had only liberated it earlier.
Lots of people who put down large payments in the bubble got it by “untrapping equity” in the bubble.Many would have been better off staying in the affordable house and watching the equity swing back down.Easy come easy go.
February 7, 2009 at 11:07 AM #343071temeculaguyParticipantAs soon as you release yourself from the mindset that your house is an investment you are free to find financial nirvana. Is renting “throwing money away?” No, but neither is buying. Both are your “housing cost.” When your housing cost is the same to buy or rent, you should buy and lock in a fixed housing cost to hedge inflation. Maybe not this year but over time, inflation has it’s way. If your rent is 2k and you can buy it for under 300k, then do it, in ten years the rent will have risen but the mortgage wont. If your 2k rental costs 400k or 500k, you are throwing money away, not because renting or buying is bad, but because you increased your housing cost too much. Eliminate the potential for appreciation from the equation and you will find clarity.
Case and point: My last rental was $1500, I could have bought it in 2006 when I was first looking to rent for about 375k. Ignoring the fact that it might double in price (which it didn’t) the correct answer is to rent, choosing to rent for half the monthly outlay was the right call. When I moved two months ago I could have bought it for under 175k, if I had wanted that size/style of housing the correct answer would have been to buy at that price because it would have been cheaper or the same price. Up or down in value, my housing cost would go down or stay the same and be locked in.
February 7, 2009 at 11:07 AM #342513temeculaguyParticipantAs soon as you release yourself from the mindset that your house is an investment you are free to find financial nirvana. Is renting “throwing money away?” No, but neither is buying. Both are your “housing cost.” When your housing cost is the same to buy or rent, you should buy and lock in a fixed housing cost to hedge inflation. Maybe not this year but over time, inflation has it’s way. If your rent is 2k and you can buy it for under 300k, then do it, in ten years the rent will have risen but the mortgage wont. If your 2k rental costs 400k or 500k, you are throwing money away, not because renting or buying is bad, but because you increased your housing cost too much. Eliminate the potential for appreciation from the equation and you will find clarity.
Case and point: My last rental was $1500, I could have bought it in 2006 when I was first looking to rent for about 375k. Ignoring the fact that it might double in price (which it didn’t) the correct answer is to rent, choosing to rent for half the monthly outlay was the right call. When I moved two months ago I could have bought it for under 175k, if I had wanted that size/style of housing the correct answer would have been to buy at that price because it would have been cheaper or the same price. Up or down in value, my housing cost would go down or stay the same and be locked in.
February 7, 2009 at 11:07 AM #342837temeculaguyParticipantAs soon as you release yourself from the mindset that your house is an investment you are free to find financial nirvana. Is renting “throwing money away?” No, but neither is buying. Both are your “housing cost.” When your housing cost is the same to buy or rent, you should buy and lock in a fixed housing cost to hedge inflation. Maybe not this year but over time, inflation has it’s way. If your rent is 2k and you can buy it for under 300k, then do it, in ten years the rent will have risen but the mortgage wont. If your 2k rental costs 400k or 500k, you are throwing money away, not because renting or buying is bad, but because you increased your housing cost too much. Eliminate the potential for appreciation from the equation and you will find clarity.
Case and point: My last rental was $1500, I could have bought it in 2006 when I was first looking to rent for about 375k. Ignoring the fact that it might double in price (which it didn’t) the correct answer is to rent, choosing to rent for half the monthly outlay was the right call. When I moved two months ago I could have bought it for under 175k, if I had wanted that size/style of housing the correct answer would have been to buy at that price because it would have been cheaper or the same price. Up or down in value, my housing cost would go down or stay the same and be locked in.
February 7, 2009 at 11:07 AM #342946temeculaguyParticipantAs soon as you release yourself from the mindset that your house is an investment you are free to find financial nirvana. Is renting “throwing money away?” No, but neither is buying. Both are your “housing cost.” When your housing cost is the same to buy or rent, you should buy and lock in a fixed housing cost to hedge inflation. Maybe not this year but over time, inflation has it’s way. If your rent is 2k and you can buy it for under 300k, then do it, in ten years the rent will have risen but the mortgage wont. If your 2k rental costs 400k or 500k, you are throwing money away, not because renting or buying is bad, but because you increased your housing cost too much. Eliminate the potential for appreciation from the equation and you will find clarity.
Case and point: My last rental was $1500, I could have bought it in 2006 when I was first looking to rent for about 375k. Ignoring the fact that it might double in price (which it didn’t) the correct answer is to rent, choosing to rent for half the monthly outlay was the right call. When I moved two months ago I could have bought it for under 175k, if I had wanted that size/style of housing the correct answer would have been to buy at that price because it would have been cheaper or the same price. Up or down in value, my housing cost would go down or stay the same and be locked in.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.