- This topic has 485 replies, 39 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 12 months ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 4, 2007 at 10:54 AM #108870December 4, 2007 at 11:02 AM #108719DaCounselorParticipant
“What about 2nd mortgage? Can I walk away from it too? Or they would come after my other asset?
2nds are recourse in California. They can come after you. If they feel they can’t get anything from you, they can 1099 you for loan loss forgiveness which gets taxed at income rates for the equivalent $$.”
________________________________If the 2nd was purchase money, like the 20% 2nd of an 80/20 deal, it is non-recourse.
December 4, 2007 at 11:02 AM #108823DaCounselorParticipant“What about 2nd mortgage? Can I walk away from it too? Or they would come after my other asset?
2nds are recourse in California. They can come after you. If they feel they can’t get anything from you, they can 1099 you for loan loss forgiveness which gets taxed at income rates for the equivalent $$.”
________________________________If the 2nd was purchase money, like the 20% 2nd of an 80/20 deal, it is non-recourse.
December 4, 2007 at 11:02 AM #108856DaCounselorParticipant“What about 2nd mortgage? Can I walk away from it too? Or they would come after my other asset?
2nds are recourse in California. They can come after you. If they feel they can’t get anything from you, they can 1099 you for loan loss forgiveness which gets taxed at income rates for the equivalent $$.”
________________________________If the 2nd was purchase money, like the 20% 2nd of an 80/20 deal, it is non-recourse.
December 4, 2007 at 11:02 AM #108857DaCounselorParticipant“What about 2nd mortgage? Can I walk away from it too? Or they would come after my other asset?
2nds are recourse in California. They can come after you. If they feel they can’t get anything from you, they can 1099 you for loan loss forgiveness which gets taxed at income rates for the equivalent $$.”
________________________________If the 2nd was purchase money, like the 20% 2nd of an 80/20 deal, it is non-recourse.
December 4, 2007 at 11:02 AM #108875DaCounselorParticipant“What about 2nd mortgage? Can I walk away from it too? Or they would come after my other asset?
2nds are recourse in California. They can come after you. If they feel they can’t get anything from you, they can 1099 you for loan loss forgiveness which gets taxed at income rates for the equivalent $$.”
________________________________If the 2nd was purchase money, like the 20% 2nd of an 80/20 deal, it is non-recourse.
December 4, 2007 at 11:23 AM #108724(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThe main driver of foreclosures is the change in real estate prices.
The recent spike in home foreclosures in Massachusetts is caused by falling home prices, and not by rising mortgage payments, according to research released yesterday by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston……This is misleading. It’s really the combination of declining prices AND the inability to pay.
When home prices were rising, people who ran into trouble or could not afford their payment did not go into foreclosure. They could sell in a rampant sellers’ market and come out with some cash.
The article makes it sound as if lower prices are the sole cause.
December 4, 2007 at 11:23 AM #108828(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThe main driver of foreclosures is the change in real estate prices.
The recent spike in home foreclosures in Massachusetts is caused by falling home prices, and not by rising mortgage payments, according to research released yesterday by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston……This is misleading. It’s really the combination of declining prices AND the inability to pay.
When home prices were rising, people who ran into trouble or could not afford their payment did not go into foreclosure. They could sell in a rampant sellers’ market and come out with some cash.
The article makes it sound as if lower prices are the sole cause.
December 4, 2007 at 11:23 AM #108861(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThe main driver of foreclosures is the change in real estate prices.
The recent spike in home foreclosures in Massachusetts is caused by falling home prices, and not by rising mortgage payments, according to research released yesterday by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston……This is misleading. It’s really the combination of declining prices AND the inability to pay.
When home prices were rising, people who ran into trouble or could not afford their payment did not go into foreclosure. They could sell in a rampant sellers’ market and come out with some cash.
The article makes it sound as if lower prices are the sole cause.
December 4, 2007 at 11:23 AM #108862(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThe main driver of foreclosures is the change in real estate prices.
The recent spike in home foreclosures in Massachusetts is caused by falling home prices, and not by rising mortgage payments, according to research released yesterday by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston……This is misleading. It’s really the combination of declining prices AND the inability to pay.
When home prices were rising, people who ran into trouble or could not afford their payment did not go into foreclosure. They could sell in a rampant sellers’ market and come out with some cash.
The article makes it sound as if lower prices are the sole cause.
December 4, 2007 at 11:23 AM #108880(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThe main driver of foreclosures is the change in real estate prices.
The recent spike in home foreclosures in Massachusetts is caused by falling home prices, and not by rising mortgage payments, according to research released yesterday by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston……This is misleading. It’s really the combination of declining prices AND the inability to pay.
When home prices were rising, people who ran into trouble or could not afford their payment did not go into foreclosure. They could sell in a rampant sellers’ market and come out with some cash.
The article makes it sound as if lower prices are the sole cause.
December 4, 2007 at 12:26 PM #108741kellyParticipantsandiego – (or anyone in a similar situation)
Any chance you’d be willing to talk more about this for a story, on or off the record?
Send me an e-mail, if so.
Thanks –
kbDecember 4, 2007 at 12:26 PM #108844kellyParticipantsandiego – (or anyone in a similar situation)
Any chance you’d be willing to talk more about this for a story, on or off the record?
Send me an e-mail, if so.
Thanks –
kbDecember 4, 2007 at 12:26 PM #108876kellyParticipantsandiego – (or anyone in a similar situation)
Any chance you’d be willing to talk more about this for a story, on or off the record?
Send me an e-mail, if so.
Thanks –
kbDecember 4, 2007 at 12:26 PM #108887kellyParticipantsandiego – (or anyone in a similar situation)
Any chance you’d be willing to talk more about this for a story, on or off the record?
Send me an e-mail, if so.
Thanks –
kb -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.