- This topic has 485 replies, 39 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 1 month ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 30, 2007 at 9:03 PM #106164November 30, 2007 at 9:26 PM #106022Ash HousewaresParticipant
Where was all the crying about banks and neighbors and loose lending when they were driving your equity through the roof?
November 30, 2007 at 9:26 PM #106116Ash HousewaresParticipantWhere was all the crying about banks and neighbors and loose lending when they were driving your equity through the roof?
November 30, 2007 at 9:26 PM #106150Ash HousewaresParticipantWhere was all the crying about banks and neighbors and loose lending when they were driving your equity through the roof?
November 30, 2007 at 9:26 PM #106158Ash HousewaresParticipantWhere was all the crying about banks and neighbors and loose lending when they were driving your equity through the roof?
November 30, 2007 at 9:26 PM #106174Ash HousewaresParticipantWhere was all the crying about banks and neighbors and loose lending when they were driving your equity through the roof?
November 30, 2007 at 9:57 PM #106032AnonymousGuestPeople are losing jobs and I’m sorry about that. However, I’m not going to support anything that will keep the current value of homes from crashing back down to ’96 (or before) prices. That’s where they should be.
The past two years, I saw people walking around the mall with coach purses in colors and driving bmw’s that they got from taking equity out of these ridiculous homes they couldn’t afford, while I was priced out the market.
I’m sure I could have gotten a loan, but I refused to pay for a house that I know is not worth what the greedy builders were asking. Greedy builders, greedy realtors, greedy buyers.
Let the chips fall where they may.
November 30, 2007 at 9:57 PM #106126AnonymousGuestPeople are losing jobs and I’m sorry about that. However, I’m not going to support anything that will keep the current value of homes from crashing back down to ’96 (or before) prices. That’s where they should be.
The past two years, I saw people walking around the mall with coach purses in colors and driving bmw’s that they got from taking equity out of these ridiculous homes they couldn’t afford, while I was priced out the market.
I’m sure I could have gotten a loan, but I refused to pay for a house that I know is not worth what the greedy builders were asking. Greedy builders, greedy realtors, greedy buyers.
Let the chips fall where they may.
November 30, 2007 at 9:57 PM #106160AnonymousGuestPeople are losing jobs and I’m sorry about that. However, I’m not going to support anything that will keep the current value of homes from crashing back down to ’96 (or before) prices. That’s where they should be.
The past two years, I saw people walking around the mall with coach purses in colors and driving bmw’s that they got from taking equity out of these ridiculous homes they couldn’t afford, while I was priced out the market.
I’m sure I could have gotten a loan, but I refused to pay for a house that I know is not worth what the greedy builders were asking. Greedy builders, greedy realtors, greedy buyers.
Let the chips fall where they may.
November 30, 2007 at 9:57 PM #106168AnonymousGuestPeople are losing jobs and I’m sorry about that. However, I’m not going to support anything that will keep the current value of homes from crashing back down to ’96 (or before) prices. That’s where they should be.
The past two years, I saw people walking around the mall with coach purses in colors and driving bmw’s that they got from taking equity out of these ridiculous homes they couldn’t afford, while I was priced out the market.
I’m sure I could have gotten a loan, but I refused to pay for a house that I know is not worth what the greedy builders were asking. Greedy builders, greedy realtors, greedy buyers.
Let the chips fall where they may.
November 30, 2007 at 9:57 PM #106184AnonymousGuestPeople are losing jobs and I’m sorry about that. However, I’m not going to support anything that will keep the current value of homes from crashing back down to ’96 (or before) prices. That’s where they should be.
The past two years, I saw people walking around the mall with coach purses in colors and driving bmw’s that they got from taking equity out of these ridiculous homes they couldn’t afford, while I was priced out the market.
I’m sure I could have gotten a loan, but I refused to pay for a house that I know is not worth what the greedy builders were asking. Greedy builders, greedy realtors, greedy buyers.
Let the chips fall where they may.
November 30, 2007 at 9:59 PM #106037citydwellerParticipantsandiego, you say you bought to occupy, but then you say you don’t want to fund a bad “investment”. So which was it? A home or an investment?
If it was truly purchased as a home that you liked and could afford, it’s current value should not be an issue.
Is your condo by chance at Aqua Vista? And have you finally had enough of the valet parking? I don’t blame you for wanting to walk away from it, but don’t try to pass it off as having bought it as your “home”.
November 30, 2007 at 9:59 PM #106131citydwellerParticipantsandiego, you say you bought to occupy, but then you say you don’t want to fund a bad “investment”. So which was it? A home or an investment?
If it was truly purchased as a home that you liked and could afford, it’s current value should not be an issue.
Is your condo by chance at Aqua Vista? And have you finally had enough of the valet parking? I don’t blame you for wanting to walk away from it, but don’t try to pass it off as having bought it as your “home”.
November 30, 2007 at 9:59 PM #106165citydwellerParticipantsandiego, you say you bought to occupy, but then you say you don’t want to fund a bad “investment”. So which was it? A home or an investment?
If it was truly purchased as a home that you liked and could afford, it’s current value should not be an issue.
Is your condo by chance at Aqua Vista? And have you finally had enough of the valet parking? I don’t blame you for wanting to walk away from it, but don’t try to pass it off as having bought it as your “home”.
November 30, 2007 at 9:59 PM #106173citydwellerParticipantsandiego, you say you bought to occupy, but then you say you don’t want to fund a bad “investment”. So which was it? A home or an investment?
If it was truly purchased as a home that you liked and could afford, it’s current value should not be an issue.
Is your condo by chance at Aqua Vista? And have you finally had enough of the valet parking? I don’t blame you for wanting to walk away from it, but don’t try to pass it off as having bought it as your “home”.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.