Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Why is San Diego real estate still so expensive?
- This topic has 635 replies, 31 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by paramount.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 6, 2010 at 3:06 PM #637095December 6, 2010 at 3:16 PM #635997surveyorParticipant
There are several reasons why one part of the country costs more than another part of the country. It can’t be pinned down on any one reason, except for of course, demand. If there’s a lot of demand for it, that’s why there’s a price point for it.
As for why San Diego justifies a higher price than Florida, one of the answers is that it has always been more difficult to build in California than in Florida. California puts a lot of regulations, requirements, and usually it takes a long time for a major housing complex to go through (sometimes it can take as long as ten years). Add to it local regulations, requirements, and the cost of such activity is much higher than everywhere else. However, Florida, Texas, and some other places do not have nearly as much onerous regulations and requirements and as a result, the cost of housing is much lower.
Because it is easier to build in other locations, if there is a decent increase of demand, an increase of supply can be applied to meet that demand. However, because San Diego’s “supply” is being constrained by regulations, requirements, and costs, it is often difficult for the market to meet the demand.
Not saying this is the one and only reason for the high cost of San Diego housing, but it is in my opinion the major factor why and accounts for probably most of the cost difference. How much? Don’t know.
December 6, 2010 at 3:16 PM #636073surveyorParticipantThere are several reasons why one part of the country costs more than another part of the country. It can’t be pinned down on any one reason, except for of course, demand. If there’s a lot of demand for it, that’s why there’s a price point for it.
As for why San Diego justifies a higher price than Florida, one of the answers is that it has always been more difficult to build in California than in Florida. California puts a lot of regulations, requirements, and usually it takes a long time for a major housing complex to go through (sometimes it can take as long as ten years). Add to it local regulations, requirements, and the cost of such activity is much higher than everywhere else. However, Florida, Texas, and some other places do not have nearly as much onerous regulations and requirements and as a result, the cost of housing is much lower.
Because it is easier to build in other locations, if there is a decent increase of demand, an increase of supply can be applied to meet that demand. However, because San Diego’s “supply” is being constrained by regulations, requirements, and costs, it is often difficult for the market to meet the demand.
Not saying this is the one and only reason for the high cost of San Diego housing, but it is in my opinion the major factor why and accounts for probably most of the cost difference. How much? Don’t know.
December 6, 2010 at 3:16 PM #636650surveyorParticipantThere are several reasons why one part of the country costs more than another part of the country. It can’t be pinned down on any one reason, except for of course, demand. If there’s a lot of demand for it, that’s why there’s a price point for it.
As for why San Diego justifies a higher price than Florida, one of the answers is that it has always been more difficult to build in California than in Florida. California puts a lot of regulations, requirements, and usually it takes a long time for a major housing complex to go through (sometimes it can take as long as ten years). Add to it local regulations, requirements, and the cost of such activity is much higher than everywhere else. However, Florida, Texas, and some other places do not have nearly as much onerous regulations and requirements and as a result, the cost of housing is much lower.
Because it is easier to build in other locations, if there is a decent increase of demand, an increase of supply can be applied to meet that demand. However, because San Diego’s “supply” is being constrained by regulations, requirements, and costs, it is often difficult for the market to meet the demand.
Not saying this is the one and only reason for the high cost of San Diego housing, but it is in my opinion the major factor why and accounts for probably most of the cost difference. How much? Don’t know.
December 6, 2010 at 3:16 PM #636783surveyorParticipantThere are several reasons why one part of the country costs more than another part of the country. It can’t be pinned down on any one reason, except for of course, demand. If there’s a lot of demand for it, that’s why there’s a price point for it.
As for why San Diego justifies a higher price than Florida, one of the answers is that it has always been more difficult to build in California than in Florida. California puts a lot of regulations, requirements, and usually it takes a long time for a major housing complex to go through (sometimes it can take as long as ten years). Add to it local regulations, requirements, and the cost of such activity is much higher than everywhere else. However, Florida, Texas, and some other places do not have nearly as much onerous regulations and requirements and as a result, the cost of housing is much lower.
Because it is easier to build in other locations, if there is a decent increase of demand, an increase of supply can be applied to meet that demand. However, because San Diego’s “supply” is being constrained by regulations, requirements, and costs, it is often difficult for the market to meet the demand.
Not saying this is the one and only reason for the high cost of San Diego housing, but it is in my opinion the major factor why and accounts for probably most of the cost difference. How much? Don’t know.
December 6, 2010 at 3:16 PM #637100surveyorParticipantThere are several reasons why one part of the country costs more than another part of the country. It can’t be pinned down on any one reason, except for of course, demand. If there’s a lot of demand for it, that’s why there’s a price point for it.
As for why San Diego justifies a higher price than Florida, one of the answers is that it has always been more difficult to build in California than in Florida. California puts a lot of regulations, requirements, and usually it takes a long time for a major housing complex to go through (sometimes it can take as long as ten years). Add to it local regulations, requirements, and the cost of such activity is much higher than everywhere else. However, Florida, Texas, and some other places do not have nearly as much onerous regulations and requirements and as a result, the cost of housing is much lower.
Because it is easier to build in other locations, if there is a decent increase of demand, an increase of supply can be applied to meet that demand. However, because San Diego’s “supply” is being constrained by regulations, requirements, and costs, it is often difficult for the market to meet the demand.
Not saying this is the one and only reason for the high cost of San Diego housing, but it is in my opinion the major factor why and accounts for probably most of the cost difference. How much? Don’t know.
December 6, 2010 at 3:30 PM #636002sdcellarParticipantIsn’t the real question, why is San Diego real estate so expensive relative to itself?
I always see these discussions of other cities or San Diego many years ago. What here got so damn much better in the last 8 or 9 years?
I mean I’m buying a house and I _still_ don’t know the answer. I think I blame mostly Qualcomm and maybe the biotechs.
December 6, 2010 at 3:30 PM #636078sdcellarParticipantIsn’t the real question, why is San Diego real estate so expensive relative to itself?
I always see these discussions of other cities or San Diego many years ago. What here got so damn much better in the last 8 or 9 years?
I mean I’m buying a house and I _still_ don’t know the answer. I think I blame mostly Qualcomm and maybe the biotechs.
December 6, 2010 at 3:30 PM #636655sdcellarParticipantIsn’t the real question, why is San Diego real estate so expensive relative to itself?
I always see these discussions of other cities or San Diego many years ago. What here got so damn much better in the last 8 or 9 years?
I mean I’m buying a house and I _still_ don’t know the answer. I think I blame mostly Qualcomm and maybe the biotechs.
December 6, 2010 at 3:30 PM #636788sdcellarParticipantIsn’t the real question, why is San Diego real estate so expensive relative to itself?
I always see these discussions of other cities or San Diego many years ago. What here got so damn much better in the last 8 or 9 years?
I mean I’m buying a house and I _still_ don’t know the answer. I think I blame mostly Qualcomm and maybe the biotechs.
December 6, 2010 at 3:30 PM #637105sdcellarParticipantIsn’t the real question, why is San Diego real estate so expensive relative to itself?
I always see these discussions of other cities or San Diego many years ago. What here got so damn much better in the last 8 or 9 years?
I mean I’m buying a house and I _still_ don’t know the answer. I think I blame mostly Qualcomm and maybe the biotechs.
December 6, 2010 at 3:58 PM #636012anParticipant[quote=sdcellar]Isn’t the real question, why is San Diego real estate so expensive relative to itself?
I always see these discussions of other cities or San Diego many years ago. What here got so damn much better in the last 8 or 9 years?
I mean I’m buying a house and I _still_ don’t know the answer. I think I blame mostly Qualcomm and maybe the biotechs.[/quote]
Most of us here will agree with you that SD hasn’t gotten that much better over the last 8-9 years, that’s why a lot of us are shooting for 2001-2003 nominal price. We’re saying w/ our checkbook that SD is not “so damn much better” today than 8-9 years ago, if anything, it’s right were it was 8-9 years ago.December 6, 2010 at 3:58 PM #636088anParticipant[quote=sdcellar]Isn’t the real question, why is San Diego real estate so expensive relative to itself?
I always see these discussions of other cities or San Diego many years ago. What here got so damn much better in the last 8 or 9 years?
I mean I’m buying a house and I _still_ don’t know the answer. I think I blame mostly Qualcomm and maybe the biotechs.[/quote]
Most of us here will agree with you that SD hasn’t gotten that much better over the last 8-9 years, that’s why a lot of us are shooting for 2001-2003 nominal price. We’re saying w/ our checkbook that SD is not “so damn much better” today than 8-9 years ago, if anything, it’s right were it was 8-9 years ago.December 6, 2010 at 3:58 PM #636665anParticipant[quote=sdcellar]Isn’t the real question, why is San Diego real estate so expensive relative to itself?
I always see these discussions of other cities or San Diego many years ago. What here got so damn much better in the last 8 or 9 years?
I mean I’m buying a house and I _still_ don’t know the answer. I think I blame mostly Qualcomm and maybe the biotechs.[/quote]
Most of us here will agree with you that SD hasn’t gotten that much better over the last 8-9 years, that’s why a lot of us are shooting for 2001-2003 nominal price. We’re saying w/ our checkbook that SD is not “so damn much better” today than 8-9 years ago, if anything, it’s right were it was 8-9 years ago.December 6, 2010 at 3:58 PM #636798anParticipant[quote=sdcellar]Isn’t the real question, why is San Diego real estate so expensive relative to itself?
I always see these discussions of other cities or San Diego many years ago. What here got so damn much better in the last 8 or 9 years?
I mean I’m buying a house and I _still_ don’t know the answer. I think I blame mostly Qualcomm and maybe the biotechs.[/quote]
Most of us here will agree with you that SD hasn’t gotten that much better over the last 8-9 years, that’s why a lot of us are shooting for 2001-2003 nominal price. We’re saying w/ our checkbook that SD is not “so damn much better” today than 8-9 years ago, if anything, it’s right were it was 8-9 years ago. -
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.