- This topic has 1,443 replies, 45 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by an.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 11, 2010 at 3:08 PM #630775November 11, 2010 at 3:14 PM #629684jstoeszParticipant
Brian I tend to agree on the stagnation prediction, but we are so volatile here. And it has happened in other locations.
Detroit imploded…
November 11, 2010 at 3:14 PM #629762jstoeszParticipantBrian I tend to agree on the stagnation prediction, but we are so volatile here. And it has happened in other locations.
Detroit imploded…
November 11, 2010 at 3:14 PM #630336jstoeszParticipantBrian I tend to agree on the stagnation prediction, but we are so volatile here. And it has happened in other locations.
Detroit imploded…
November 11, 2010 at 3:14 PM #630463jstoeszParticipantBrian I tend to agree on the stagnation prediction, but we are so volatile here. And it has happened in other locations.
Detroit imploded…
November 11, 2010 at 3:14 PM #630780jstoeszParticipantBrian I tend to agree on the stagnation prediction, but we are so volatile here. And it has happened in other locations.
Detroit imploded…
November 11, 2010 at 3:21 PM #629705jstoeszParticipant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=jstoesz]. . . In other words, old people are not why Clairemont is expensive.[/quote]
Agreed.
But is Clairemont “expensive” in relation to other SD neighborhoods?
If you think so, which neighborhoods do you think are a better buy??
Just curious…[/quote]
I am really struggling to come up with a better buy…it is like asking me which limb I would cut off first. It is an unpleasant choice. If I had too, I think Mt. Helix may have the greatest chance of an upside. If the city keeps growing it gets less east every day. Interesting homes on big lots prices far lower per square foot than much of the county. And I have seen some potentially fair deals out there compared to the brutal rip offs of the rest of the county.
But the whole county makes me really nervous
November 11, 2010 at 3:21 PM #629782jstoeszParticipant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=jstoesz]. . . In other words, old people are not why Clairemont is expensive.[/quote]
Agreed.
But is Clairemont “expensive” in relation to other SD neighborhoods?
If you think so, which neighborhoods do you think are a better buy??
Just curious…[/quote]
I am really struggling to come up with a better buy…it is like asking me which limb I would cut off first. It is an unpleasant choice. If I had too, I think Mt. Helix may have the greatest chance of an upside. If the city keeps growing it gets less east every day. Interesting homes on big lots prices far lower per square foot than much of the county. And I have seen some potentially fair deals out there compared to the brutal rip offs of the rest of the county.
But the whole county makes me really nervous
November 11, 2010 at 3:21 PM #630356jstoeszParticipant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=jstoesz]. . . In other words, old people are not why Clairemont is expensive.[/quote]
Agreed.
But is Clairemont “expensive” in relation to other SD neighborhoods?
If you think so, which neighborhoods do you think are a better buy??
Just curious…[/quote]
I am really struggling to come up with a better buy…it is like asking me which limb I would cut off first. It is an unpleasant choice. If I had too, I think Mt. Helix may have the greatest chance of an upside. If the city keeps growing it gets less east every day. Interesting homes on big lots prices far lower per square foot than much of the county. And I have seen some potentially fair deals out there compared to the brutal rip offs of the rest of the county.
But the whole county makes me really nervous
November 11, 2010 at 3:21 PM #630483jstoeszParticipant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=jstoesz]. . . In other words, old people are not why Clairemont is expensive.[/quote]
Agreed.
But is Clairemont “expensive” in relation to other SD neighborhoods?
If you think so, which neighborhoods do you think are a better buy??
Just curious…[/quote]
I am really struggling to come up with a better buy…it is like asking me which limb I would cut off first. It is an unpleasant choice. If I had too, I think Mt. Helix may have the greatest chance of an upside. If the city keeps growing it gets less east every day. Interesting homes on big lots prices far lower per square foot than much of the county. And I have seen some potentially fair deals out there compared to the brutal rip offs of the rest of the county.
But the whole county makes me really nervous
November 11, 2010 at 3:21 PM #630801jstoeszParticipant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=jstoesz]. . . In other words, old people are not why Clairemont is expensive.[/quote]
Agreed.
But is Clairemont “expensive” in relation to other SD neighborhoods?
If you think so, which neighborhoods do you think are a better buy??
Just curious…[/quote]
I am really struggling to come up with a better buy…it is like asking me which limb I would cut off first. It is an unpleasant choice. If I had too, I think Mt. Helix may have the greatest chance of an upside. If the city keeps growing it gets less east every day. Interesting homes on big lots prices far lower per square foot than much of the county. And I have seen some potentially fair deals out there compared to the brutal rip offs of the rest of the county.
But the whole county makes me really nervous
November 11, 2010 at 3:45 PM #629735(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=jstoesz]oh just to hammer my whole point home about how much homes cost here in relation to better neighborhoods in other cities.
This is the zip I grew up in.
http://realestate.aol.com/55419-neighborhood
3.2X !!!
income is 20k more and homes are almost 200k cheaper.[/quote]I agree with you 100% that San Diego is overpriced compared to many other cities.
My simple point is that right now in 2010, in terms of monthly costs relative to rent or income San Diego (in aggregate and in many median-priced neighborhoods, such as Clairemont) is more affordable than it has been since at least 1977.
November 11, 2010 at 3:45 PM #629812(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=jstoesz]oh just to hammer my whole point home about how much homes cost here in relation to better neighborhoods in other cities.
This is the zip I grew up in.
http://realestate.aol.com/55419-neighborhood
3.2X !!!
income is 20k more and homes are almost 200k cheaper.[/quote]I agree with you 100% that San Diego is overpriced compared to many other cities.
My simple point is that right now in 2010, in terms of monthly costs relative to rent or income San Diego (in aggregate and in many median-priced neighborhoods, such as Clairemont) is more affordable than it has been since at least 1977.
November 11, 2010 at 3:45 PM #630386(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=jstoesz]oh just to hammer my whole point home about how much homes cost here in relation to better neighborhoods in other cities.
This is the zip I grew up in.
http://realestate.aol.com/55419-neighborhood
3.2X !!!
income is 20k more and homes are almost 200k cheaper.[/quote]I agree with you 100% that San Diego is overpriced compared to many other cities.
My simple point is that right now in 2010, in terms of monthly costs relative to rent or income San Diego (in aggregate and in many median-priced neighborhoods, such as Clairemont) is more affordable than it has been since at least 1977.
November 11, 2010 at 3:45 PM #630513(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=jstoesz]oh just to hammer my whole point home about how much homes cost here in relation to better neighborhoods in other cities.
This is the zip I grew up in.
http://realestate.aol.com/55419-neighborhood
3.2X !!!
income is 20k more and homes are almost 200k cheaper.[/quote]I agree with you 100% that San Diego is overpriced compared to many other cities.
My simple point is that right now in 2010, in terms of monthly costs relative to rent or income San Diego (in aggregate and in many median-priced neighborhoods, such as Clairemont) is more affordable than it has been since at least 1977.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.