Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Why California Is Doomed
- This topic has 205 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by DWCAP.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 11, 2010 at 10:14 AM #525408March 11, 2010 at 10:27 AM #524482ArrayaParticipant
For-profit prisons started under Reagan and exponentially increased under Clinton, as did marijuana arrests. When incarcerations become profitable, you know they will increase.
March 11, 2010 at 10:27 AM #524616ArrayaParticipantFor-profit prisons started under Reagan and exponentially increased under Clinton, as did marijuana arrests. When incarcerations become profitable, you know they will increase.
March 11, 2010 at 10:27 AM #525059ArrayaParticipantFor-profit prisons started under Reagan and exponentially increased under Clinton, as did marijuana arrests. When incarcerations become profitable, you know they will increase.
March 11, 2010 at 10:27 AM #525155ArrayaParticipantFor-profit prisons started under Reagan and exponentially increased under Clinton, as did marijuana arrests. When incarcerations become profitable, you know they will increase.
March 11, 2010 at 10:27 AM #525413ArrayaParticipantFor-profit prisons started under Reagan and exponentially increased under Clinton, as did marijuana arrests. When incarcerations become profitable, you know they will increase.
March 11, 2010 at 3:42 PM #524678CA renterParticipant[quote=scaredycat]what i envision is a much, much greater and stricter divide between haves and have-nots. For years we’ve put a world-record-setting percentage of people in prison. Some argue that’s not just about law and order, but that imprisonment is big business — provides a solution to what to do with some of the unemployable, while making money from their misery. I expect that trend to cotinue, and to expand in unexpected ways. Not sure what it will look like. I doubt we can physically imprison 20-30% of the population. but perhaps home detention, electronic monitoring, defined boundaries, greater restrictions on liberty for law violations, like trespassing,food theft, homelessness related crimes…so much so that the nature of the way we live and relate to each other changes. I know this is pretty negative and creepy and probably unlikely…[/quote]
Unfortunately, I agree with you.
π
March 11, 2010 at 3:42 PM #524811CA renterParticipant[quote=scaredycat]what i envision is a much, much greater and stricter divide between haves and have-nots. For years we’ve put a world-record-setting percentage of people in prison. Some argue that’s not just about law and order, but that imprisonment is big business — provides a solution to what to do with some of the unemployable, while making money from their misery. I expect that trend to cotinue, and to expand in unexpected ways. Not sure what it will look like. I doubt we can physically imprison 20-30% of the population. but perhaps home detention, electronic monitoring, defined boundaries, greater restrictions on liberty for law violations, like trespassing,food theft, homelessness related crimes…so much so that the nature of the way we live and relate to each other changes. I know this is pretty negative and creepy and probably unlikely…[/quote]
Unfortunately, I agree with you.
π
March 11, 2010 at 3:42 PM #525254CA renterParticipant[quote=scaredycat]what i envision is a much, much greater and stricter divide between haves and have-nots. For years we’ve put a world-record-setting percentage of people in prison. Some argue that’s not just about law and order, but that imprisonment is big business — provides a solution to what to do with some of the unemployable, while making money from their misery. I expect that trend to cotinue, and to expand in unexpected ways. Not sure what it will look like. I doubt we can physically imprison 20-30% of the population. but perhaps home detention, electronic monitoring, defined boundaries, greater restrictions on liberty for law violations, like trespassing,food theft, homelessness related crimes…so much so that the nature of the way we live and relate to each other changes. I know this is pretty negative and creepy and probably unlikely…[/quote]
Unfortunately, I agree with you.
π
March 11, 2010 at 3:42 PM #525351CA renterParticipant[quote=scaredycat]what i envision is a much, much greater and stricter divide between haves and have-nots. For years we’ve put a world-record-setting percentage of people in prison. Some argue that’s not just about law and order, but that imprisonment is big business — provides a solution to what to do with some of the unemployable, while making money from their misery. I expect that trend to cotinue, and to expand in unexpected ways. Not sure what it will look like. I doubt we can physically imprison 20-30% of the population. but perhaps home detention, electronic monitoring, defined boundaries, greater restrictions on liberty for law violations, like trespassing,food theft, homelessness related crimes…so much so that the nature of the way we live and relate to each other changes. I know this is pretty negative and creepy and probably unlikely…[/quote]
Unfortunately, I agree with you.
π
March 11, 2010 at 3:42 PM #525608CA renterParticipant[quote=scaredycat]what i envision is a much, much greater and stricter divide between haves and have-nots. For years we’ve put a world-record-setting percentage of people in prison. Some argue that’s not just about law and order, but that imprisonment is big business — provides a solution to what to do with some of the unemployable, while making money from their misery. I expect that trend to cotinue, and to expand in unexpected ways. Not sure what it will look like. I doubt we can physically imprison 20-30% of the population. but perhaps home detention, electronic monitoring, defined boundaries, greater restrictions on liberty for law violations, like trespassing,food theft, homelessness related crimes…so much so that the nature of the way we live and relate to each other changes. I know this is pretty negative and creepy and probably unlikely…[/quote]
Unfortunately, I agree with you.
π
March 11, 2010 at 10:12 PM #524838paramountParticipant[quote=scaredycat]what i envision is a much, much greater and stricter divide between haves and have-nots. For years we’ve put a world-record-setting percentage of people in prison. Some argue that’s not just about law and order, but that imprisonment is big business — provides a solution to what to do with some of the unemployable, while making money from their misery. I expect that trend to cotinue, and to expand in unexpected ways. Not sure what it will look like. I doubt we can physically imprison 20-30% of the population. but perhaps home detention, electronic monitoring, defined boundaries, greater restrictions on liberty for law violations, like trespassing,food theft, homelessness related crimes…so much so that the nature of the way we live and relate to each other changes. I know this is pretty negative and creepy and probably unlikely…[/quote]
I’m not so sure it’s that unlikely…
March 11, 2010 at 10:12 PM #524971paramountParticipant[quote=scaredycat]what i envision is a much, much greater and stricter divide between haves and have-nots. For years we’ve put a world-record-setting percentage of people in prison. Some argue that’s not just about law and order, but that imprisonment is big business — provides a solution to what to do with some of the unemployable, while making money from their misery. I expect that trend to cotinue, and to expand in unexpected ways. Not sure what it will look like. I doubt we can physically imprison 20-30% of the population. but perhaps home detention, electronic monitoring, defined boundaries, greater restrictions on liberty for law violations, like trespassing,food theft, homelessness related crimes…so much so that the nature of the way we live and relate to each other changes. I know this is pretty negative and creepy and probably unlikely…[/quote]
I’m not so sure it’s that unlikely…
March 11, 2010 at 10:12 PM #525414paramountParticipant[quote=scaredycat]what i envision is a much, much greater and stricter divide between haves and have-nots. For years we’ve put a world-record-setting percentage of people in prison. Some argue that’s not just about law and order, but that imprisonment is big business — provides a solution to what to do with some of the unemployable, while making money from their misery. I expect that trend to cotinue, and to expand in unexpected ways. Not sure what it will look like. I doubt we can physically imprison 20-30% of the population. but perhaps home detention, electronic monitoring, defined boundaries, greater restrictions on liberty for law violations, like trespassing,food theft, homelessness related crimes…so much so that the nature of the way we live and relate to each other changes. I know this is pretty negative and creepy and probably unlikely…[/quote]
I’m not so sure it’s that unlikely…
March 11, 2010 at 10:12 PM #525511paramountParticipant[quote=scaredycat]what i envision is a much, much greater and stricter divide between haves and have-nots. For years we’ve put a world-record-setting percentage of people in prison. Some argue that’s not just about law and order, but that imprisonment is big business — provides a solution to what to do with some of the unemployable, while making money from their misery. I expect that trend to cotinue, and to expand in unexpected ways. Not sure what it will look like. I doubt we can physically imprison 20-30% of the population. but perhaps home detention, electronic monitoring, defined boundaries, greater restrictions on liberty for law violations, like trespassing,food theft, homelessness related crimes…so much so that the nature of the way we live and relate to each other changes. I know this is pretty negative and creepy and probably unlikely…[/quote]
I’m not so sure it’s that unlikely…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.