Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › When are sellers disclosures usually given
- This topic has 45 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by
urbanrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 19, 2009 at 5:28 PM #16371September 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM #459047
ybitz
ParticipantI agree that seller disclosure should be made available even before the offer is made. It would advantageous to the seller too, because you would get more serious offers from buyer (since they know what they’re getting into), and presumably less buyers retracting their offer because of something in the disclosure.
Can you think of reasons against sellers disclosing prior to offer acceptance? Privacy?September 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM #459844ybitz
ParticipantI agree that seller disclosure should be made available even before the offer is made. It would advantageous to the seller too, because you would get more serious offers from buyer (since they know what they’re getting into), and presumably less buyers retracting their offer because of something in the disclosure.
Can you think of reasons against sellers disclosing prior to offer acceptance? Privacy?September 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM #459648ybitz
ParticipantI agree that seller disclosure should be made available even before the offer is made. It would advantageous to the seller too, because you would get more serious offers from buyer (since they know what they’re getting into), and presumably less buyers retracting their offer because of something in the disclosure.
Can you think of reasons against sellers disclosing prior to offer acceptance? Privacy?September 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM #459577ybitz
ParticipantI agree that seller disclosure should be made available even before the offer is made. It would advantageous to the seller too, because you would get more serious offers from buyer (since they know what they’re getting into), and presumably less buyers retracting their offer because of something in the disclosure.
Can you think of reasons against sellers disclosing prior to offer acceptance? Privacy?September 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM #459242ybitz
ParticipantI agree that seller disclosure should be made available even before the offer is made. It would advantageous to the seller too, because you would get more serious offers from buyer (since they know what they’re getting into), and presumably less buyers retracting their offer because of something in the disclosure.
Can you think of reasons against sellers disclosing prior to offer acceptance? Privacy?September 19, 2009 at 8:18 PM #459261urbanrealtor
ParticipantTypically, they are due within one week of offer acceptance.
I don’t provide them beforehand because if the house waits too long, sometimes things change and so the disclosures need to be updated.
Though honestly there is nothing wrong with having them available before marketing the house.September 19, 2009 at 8:18 PM #459067urbanrealtor
ParticipantTypically, they are due within one week of offer acceptance.
I don’t provide them beforehand because if the house waits too long, sometimes things change and so the disclosures need to be updated.
Though honestly there is nothing wrong with having them available before marketing the house.September 19, 2009 at 8:18 PM #459596urbanrealtor
ParticipantTypically, they are due within one week of offer acceptance.
I don’t provide them beforehand because if the house waits too long, sometimes things change and so the disclosures need to be updated.
Though honestly there is nothing wrong with having them available before marketing the house.September 19, 2009 at 8:18 PM #459669urbanrealtor
ParticipantTypically, they are due within one week of offer acceptance.
I don’t provide them beforehand because if the house waits too long, sometimes things change and so the disclosures need to be updated.
Though honestly there is nothing wrong with having them available before marketing the house.September 19, 2009 at 8:18 PM #459863urbanrealtor
ParticipantTypically, they are due within one week of offer acceptance.
I don’t provide them beforehand because if the house waits too long, sometimes things change and so the disclosures need to be updated.
Though honestly there is nothing wrong with having them available before marketing the house.September 20, 2009 at 8:08 AM #459397UCGal
ParticipantI haven’t sold in California… but I sold in Washington State and in Pennsylvania. In both cases I had to fill out disclosure information as part of the listing package. So the listing agent had all the disclosure information before it was listed.
(Both homes were over 100 years old – so there was disclosure.)
September 20, 2009 at 8:08 AM #459804UCGal
ParticipantI haven’t sold in California… but I sold in Washington State and in Pennsylvania. In both cases I had to fill out disclosure information as part of the listing package. So the listing agent had all the disclosure information before it was listed.
(Both homes were over 100 years old – so there was disclosure.)
September 20, 2009 at 8:08 AM #459732UCGal
ParticipantI haven’t sold in California… but I sold in Washington State and in Pennsylvania. In both cases I had to fill out disclosure information as part of the listing package. So the listing agent had all the disclosure information before it was listed.
(Both homes were over 100 years old – so there was disclosure.)
September 20, 2009 at 8:08 AM #459998UCGal
ParticipantI haven’t sold in California… but I sold in Washington State and in Pennsylvania. In both cases I had to fill out disclosure information as part of the listing package. So the listing agent had all the disclosure information before it was listed.
(Both homes were over 100 years old – so there was disclosure.)
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.