- This topic has 114 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 5 months ago by no_such_reality.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 7, 2007 at 11:56 AM #71468August 7, 2007 at 12:40 PM #71376PerryChaseParticipant
The ownership premium that owners pay months after months needs to be deducted from the net when they sell to arrive at the true gain/loss.
You can rent a house that would’ve sold in 2005 for $1 million for $3,000 to $3,500/month. Even if you can afford the payments, you’re losing money every month you own the house. Unless appreciation is, at the minimum, equal to the ownership premium, then you’re losing money every month you own the house.
August 7, 2007 at 12:40 PM #71490PerryChaseParticipantThe ownership premium that owners pay months after months needs to be deducted from the net when they sell to arrive at the true gain/loss.
You can rent a house that would’ve sold in 2005 for $1 million for $3,000 to $3,500/month. Even if you can afford the payments, you’re losing money every month you own the house. Unless appreciation is, at the minimum, equal to the ownership premium, then you’re losing money every month you own the house.
August 7, 2007 at 12:40 PM #71496PerryChaseParticipantThe ownership premium that owners pay months after months needs to be deducted from the net when they sell to arrive at the true gain/loss.
You can rent a house that would’ve sold in 2005 for $1 million for $3,000 to $3,500/month. Even if you can afford the payments, you’re losing money every month you own the house. Unless appreciation is, at the minimum, equal to the ownership premium, then you’re losing money every month you own the house.
August 7, 2007 at 12:43 PM #71381JWM in SDParticipantNo sd realtor it was not aimed at you. I don’t agree with you on certain aspects, but you are not disingenuous in my opinion.
August 7, 2007 at 12:43 PM #71495JWM in SDParticipantNo sd realtor it was not aimed at you. I don’t agree with you on certain aspects, but you are not disingenuous in my opinion.
August 7, 2007 at 12:43 PM #71502JWM in SDParticipantNo sd realtor it was not aimed at you. I don’t agree with you on certain aspects, but you are not disingenuous in my opinion.
August 7, 2007 at 1:12 PM #71410bubba99ParticipantTo restate the issue, “Is a $400k house at 8% interest effectively worth more than an $790k house at 4% interest?”
Except for some tax or calculation differences the monthly payment is the same. Taxes are higher on the $790k house, tax deductions also higher. To the buyer, the cost of ownership might be very comparable. And that is a problem. The cost increases driven by low interest to some extent kept the payments even. Now that the rates are being raised, yes price will decrease, but monthly payment stay the same.
To the buyer who needed teaser rates to qualify the market is now unavailable.
To the buyer with a big down payment from the early 2006 sale of his/her over priced home, the market is going to look very good.
To everyone else, the market looks the same (interest) times (price) = payment =/- 4%
August 7, 2007 at 1:12 PM #71525bubba99ParticipantTo restate the issue, “Is a $400k house at 8% interest effectively worth more than an $790k house at 4% interest?”
Except for some tax or calculation differences the monthly payment is the same. Taxes are higher on the $790k house, tax deductions also higher. To the buyer, the cost of ownership might be very comparable. And that is a problem. The cost increases driven by low interest to some extent kept the payments even. Now that the rates are being raised, yes price will decrease, but monthly payment stay the same.
To the buyer who needed teaser rates to qualify the market is now unavailable.
To the buyer with a big down payment from the early 2006 sale of his/her over priced home, the market is going to look very good.
To everyone else, the market looks the same (interest) times (price) = payment =/- 4%
August 7, 2007 at 1:12 PM #71531bubba99ParticipantTo restate the issue, “Is a $400k house at 8% interest effectively worth more than an $790k house at 4% interest?”
Except for some tax or calculation differences the monthly payment is the same. Taxes are higher on the $790k house, tax deductions also higher. To the buyer, the cost of ownership might be very comparable. And that is a problem. The cost increases driven by low interest to some extent kept the payments even. Now that the rates are being raised, yes price will decrease, but monthly payment stay the same.
To the buyer who needed teaser rates to qualify the market is now unavailable.
To the buyer with a big down payment from the early 2006 sale of his/her over priced home, the market is going to look very good.
To everyone else, the market looks the same (interest) times (price) = payment =/- 4%
August 7, 2007 at 1:17 PM #71416JWM in SDParticipant“To the buyer with a big down payment from the early 2006 sale of his/her over priced home, the market is going to look very good.
To everyone else, the market looks the same (interest) times (price) = payment =/- 4%”
It is also going to look very good to those with lots of cash for a downpayment as well. You know, like those bitter renters who saved the difference between rent and the comparable mortgage payments.
August 7, 2007 at 1:17 PM #71532JWM in SDParticipant“To the buyer with a big down payment from the early 2006 sale of his/her over priced home, the market is going to look very good.
To everyone else, the market looks the same (interest) times (price) = payment =/- 4%”
It is also going to look very good to those with lots of cash for a downpayment as well. You know, like those bitter renters who saved the difference between rent and the comparable mortgage payments.
August 7, 2007 at 1:17 PM #71537JWM in SDParticipant“To the buyer with a big down payment from the early 2006 sale of his/her over priced home, the market is going to look very good.
To everyone else, the market looks the same (interest) times (price) = payment =/- 4%”
It is also going to look very good to those with lots of cash for a downpayment as well. You know, like those bitter renters who saved the difference between rent and the comparable mortgage payments.
August 7, 2007 at 1:38 PM #71428sdrealtorParticipantgotcha, jus checkin
August 7, 2007 at 1:38 PM #71544sdrealtorParticipantgotcha, jus checkin
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.