- This topic has 140 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by (former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM #137730January 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM #137431DaCounselorParticipant
“But why would he take that ARM when he could get a fixed for that rate and lock it in for 30 years?”
_____________________________Because if he went conventional 30 yr fixed he would be paying principal as well, which on a median SD purchase probably would have bumped the monthly payment up by about $500/month. I think alot of the ARMS were interest only.
FSD has a good handle on the reset issue. As for how long LIBOR can remain at historically very low levels, we just had a 4 year run of very low rates earlier this decade. How far will LIBOR drop and how long will it stay low this time around? Who knows?
January 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM #137638DaCounselorParticipant“But why would he take that ARM when he could get a fixed for that rate and lock it in for 30 years?”
_____________________________Because if he went conventional 30 yr fixed he would be paying principal as well, which on a median SD purchase probably would have bumped the monthly payment up by about $500/month. I think alot of the ARMS were interest only.
FSD has a good handle on the reset issue. As for how long LIBOR can remain at historically very low levels, we just had a 4 year run of very low rates earlier this decade. How far will LIBOR drop and how long will it stay low this time around? Who knows?
January 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM #137666DaCounselorParticipant“But why would he take that ARM when he could get a fixed for that rate and lock it in for 30 years?”
_____________________________Because if he went conventional 30 yr fixed he would be paying principal as well, which on a median SD purchase probably would have bumped the monthly payment up by about $500/month. I think alot of the ARMS were interest only.
FSD has a good handle on the reset issue. As for how long LIBOR can remain at historically very low levels, we just had a 4 year run of very low rates earlier this decade. How far will LIBOR drop and how long will it stay low this time around? Who knows?
January 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM #137692DaCounselorParticipant“But why would he take that ARM when he could get a fixed for that rate and lock it in for 30 years?”
_____________________________Because if he went conventional 30 yr fixed he would be paying principal as well, which on a median SD purchase probably would have bumped the monthly payment up by about $500/month. I think alot of the ARMS were interest only.
FSD has a good handle on the reset issue. As for how long LIBOR can remain at historically very low levels, we just had a 4 year run of very low rates earlier this decade. How far will LIBOR drop and how long will it stay low this time around? Who knows?
January 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM #137735DaCounselorParticipant“But why would he take that ARM when he could get a fixed for that rate and lock it in for 30 years?”
_____________________________Because if he went conventional 30 yr fixed he would be paying principal as well, which on a median SD purchase probably would have bumped the monthly payment up by about $500/month. I think alot of the ARMS were interest only.
FSD has a good handle on the reset issue. As for how long LIBOR can remain at historically very low levels, we just had a 4 year run of very low rates earlier this decade. How far will LIBOR drop and how long will it stay low this time around? Who knows?
January 17, 2008 at 3:14 PM #137451EugeneParticipantIn 2003, typical ARM interest rates were in 4 – 4.5% land. They didn’t get to 5.75% until 2006.
January 17, 2008 at 3:14 PM #137657EugeneParticipantIn 2003, typical ARM interest rates were in 4 – 4.5% land. They didn’t get to 5.75% until 2006.
January 17, 2008 at 3:14 PM #137686EugeneParticipantIn 2003, typical ARM interest rates were in 4 – 4.5% land. They didn’t get to 5.75% until 2006.
January 17, 2008 at 3:14 PM #137712EugeneParticipantIn 2003, typical ARM interest rates were in 4 – 4.5% land. They didn’t get to 5.75% until 2006.
January 17, 2008 at 3:14 PM #137755EugeneParticipantIn 2003, typical ARM interest rates were in 4 – 4.5% land. They didn’t get to 5.75% until 2006.
January 17, 2008 at 3:38 PM #137496DWCAPParticipantesmith,
I dont mean to seem like I am disagreing with you all the time. You just seem to have a more bullish sentement on rents than I do. I agree that rents will create a floor underhousing. I just think that using the highest rent in the area to justify pricing isnt gonna pan out. Using your same numbers, but tying to the lower range of the rent scale I get a purchase price of $245000. Requiring a reduction of 25% on current 330000 listings.Downpayment: 12500
Morgage: 1350
Prop Tax: 245
HOA: 325
Tax deduct: -427
dont forget 5% down brings morgage insurance:
morg. ins. 80Total: 2000/month.
-427 tax deduction
Cost: 1575/monthThis is right in the middle of the range of rents right now and doesnt include upkeep costs, homeowners insurance, any managment or advertising fees, or rent loss due to turnover. The cost of capital on 12000 isnt much, so forget that.
Plus the argument that rents rise, so long term it is a good investment is a hard sell on me. Sure over 30 years it will turn cash positive, but that still doesnt make it a good investment. Most any non retarded or high risk investment over 30 years will make a return. Plus in the time frame we are talking about, 1-5 years, who says rents go up?
http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/realestate/bal-renters0121,0,4619944.story?ref=patrick.net
http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/16/real_estate/rents_flat/index.htm?ref=patrick.net
January 17, 2008 at 3:38 PM #137703DWCAPParticipantesmith,
I dont mean to seem like I am disagreing with you all the time. You just seem to have a more bullish sentement on rents than I do. I agree that rents will create a floor underhousing. I just think that using the highest rent in the area to justify pricing isnt gonna pan out. Using your same numbers, but tying to the lower range of the rent scale I get a purchase price of $245000. Requiring a reduction of 25% on current 330000 listings.Downpayment: 12500
Morgage: 1350
Prop Tax: 245
HOA: 325
Tax deduct: -427
dont forget 5% down brings morgage insurance:
morg. ins. 80Total: 2000/month.
-427 tax deduction
Cost: 1575/monthThis is right in the middle of the range of rents right now and doesnt include upkeep costs, homeowners insurance, any managment or advertising fees, or rent loss due to turnover. The cost of capital on 12000 isnt much, so forget that.
Plus the argument that rents rise, so long term it is a good investment is a hard sell on me. Sure over 30 years it will turn cash positive, but that still doesnt make it a good investment. Most any non retarded or high risk investment over 30 years will make a return. Plus in the time frame we are talking about, 1-5 years, who says rents go up?
http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/realestate/bal-renters0121,0,4619944.story?ref=patrick.net
http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/16/real_estate/rents_flat/index.htm?ref=patrick.net
January 17, 2008 at 3:38 PM #137731DWCAPParticipantesmith,
I dont mean to seem like I am disagreing with you all the time. You just seem to have a more bullish sentement on rents than I do. I agree that rents will create a floor underhousing. I just think that using the highest rent in the area to justify pricing isnt gonna pan out. Using your same numbers, but tying to the lower range of the rent scale I get a purchase price of $245000. Requiring a reduction of 25% on current 330000 listings.Downpayment: 12500
Morgage: 1350
Prop Tax: 245
HOA: 325
Tax deduct: -427
dont forget 5% down brings morgage insurance:
morg. ins. 80Total: 2000/month.
-427 tax deduction
Cost: 1575/monthThis is right in the middle of the range of rents right now and doesnt include upkeep costs, homeowners insurance, any managment or advertising fees, or rent loss due to turnover. The cost of capital on 12000 isnt much, so forget that.
Plus the argument that rents rise, so long term it is a good investment is a hard sell on me. Sure over 30 years it will turn cash positive, but that still doesnt make it a good investment. Most any non retarded or high risk investment over 30 years will make a return. Plus in the time frame we are talking about, 1-5 years, who says rents go up?
http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/realestate/bal-renters0121,0,4619944.story?ref=patrick.net
http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/16/real_estate/rents_flat/index.htm?ref=patrick.net
January 17, 2008 at 3:38 PM #137759DWCAPParticipantesmith,
I dont mean to seem like I am disagreing with you all the time. You just seem to have a more bullish sentement on rents than I do. I agree that rents will create a floor underhousing. I just think that using the highest rent in the area to justify pricing isnt gonna pan out. Using your same numbers, but tying to the lower range of the rent scale I get a purchase price of $245000. Requiring a reduction of 25% on current 330000 listings.Downpayment: 12500
Morgage: 1350
Prop Tax: 245
HOA: 325
Tax deduct: -427
dont forget 5% down brings morgage insurance:
morg. ins. 80Total: 2000/month.
-427 tax deduction
Cost: 1575/monthThis is right in the middle of the range of rents right now and doesnt include upkeep costs, homeowners insurance, any managment or advertising fees, or rent loss due to turnover. The cost of capital on 12000 isnt much, so forget that.
Plus the argument that rents rise, so long term it is a good investment is a hard sell on me. Sure over 30 years it will turn cash positive, but that still doesnt make it a good investment. Most any non retarded or high risk investment over 30 years will make a return. Plus in the time frame we are talking about, 1-5 years, who says rents go up?
http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/realestate/bal-renters0121,0,4619944.story?ref=patrick.net
http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/16/real_estate/rents_flat/index.htm?ref=patrick.net
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.