Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › What’s up with 10537 Moorland Heights Way, 92121?
- This topic has 55 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 4 months ago by
Doofrat.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 8, 2008 at 11:46 AM #254901August 8, 2008 at 11:47 AM #254620
92027_guy
ParticipantDouble post…sorry
August 8, 2008 at 11:47 AM #25479292027_guy
ParticipantDouble post…sorry
August 8, 2008 at 11:47 AM #25479892027_guy
ParticipantDouble post…sorry
August 8, 2008 at 11:47 AM #25485492027_guy
ParticipantDouble post…sorry
August 8, 2008 at 11:47 AM #25490692027_guy
ParticipantDouble post…sorry
August 8, 2008 at 12:46 PM #254649Doofrat
ParticipantThat was in 95 when the interest rates were about 50% higher, lending was tighter, incomes were lower and so were overall consumer prices.
Look at the historical income and consumer price data and add it up and the prices make sense back then.August 8, 2008 at 12:46 PM #254822Doofrat
ParticipantThat was in 95 when the interest rates were about 50% higher, lending was tighter, incomes were lower and so were overall consumer prices.
Look at the historical income and consumer price data and add it up and the prices make sense back then.August 8, 2008 at 12:46 PM #254828Doofrat
ParticipantThat was in 95 when the interest rates were about 50% higher, lending was tighter, incomes were lower and so were overall consumer prices.
Look at the historical income and consumer price data and add it up and the prices make sense back then.August 8, 2008 at 12:46 PM #254885Doofrat
ParticipantThat was in 95 when the interest rates were about 50% higher, lending was tighter, incomes were lower and so were overall consumer prices.
Look at the historical income and consumer price data and add it up and the prices make sense back then.August 8, 2008 at 12:46 PM #254935Doofrat
ParticipantThat was in 95 when the interest rates were about 50% higher, lending was tighter, incomes were lower and so were overall consumer prices.
Look at the historical income and consumer price data and add it up and the prices make sense back then.August 8, 2008 at 1:13 PM #254674an
Participant226k in 95 for 2100 sq-ft house in SV is as expected. 2100 sq-ft house in CV goes for around 300k back then and 1500 sq-ft house in MM goes for around 150k at the time.
Since interest rate at the time were around 10%, you’re looking at payment of ~$2k/month for SV, ~$2600/month for CV, and $1300/month for MM house. If you reduce the interest back down to 6% like it is today, in order to achieve the same monthly payment, you’ll be looking at $350k for the SV house, $440k for the CV house, and $220k for the MM house. If you just add in 3% inflation, you might be able to guess where that # would be in today’s $. Personally, I take the monthly mortgage premium as a good measurement of how much more the high end will have to fall compare to the low end right now.
August 8, 2008 at 1:13 PM #254847an
Participant226k in 95 for 2100 sq-ft house in SV is as expected. 2100 sq-ft house in CV goes for around 300k back then and 1500 sq-ft house in MM goes for around 150k at the time.
Since interest rate at the time were around 10%, you’re looking at payment of ~$2k/month for SV, ~$2600/month for CV, and $1300/month for MM house. If you reduce the interest back down to 6% like it is today, in order to achieve the same monthly payment, you’ll be looking at $350k for the SV house, $440k for the CV house, and $220k for the MM house. If you just add in 3% inflation, you might be able to guess where that # would be in today’s $. Personally, I take the monthly mortgage premium as a good measurement of how much more the high end will have to fall compare to the low end right now.
August 8, 2008 at 1:13 PM #254853an
Participant226k in 95 for 2100 sq-ft house in SV is as expected. 2100 sq-ft house in CV goes for around 300k back then and 1500 sq-ft house in MM goes for around 150k at the time.
Since interest rate at the time were around 10%, you’re looking at payment of ~$2k/month for SV, ~$2600/month for CV, and $1300/month for MM house. If you reduce the interest back down to 6% like it is today, in order to achieve the same monthly payment, you’ll be looking at $350k for the SV house, $440k for the CV house, and $220k for the MM house. If you just add in 3% inflation, you might be able to guess where that # would be in today’s $. Personally, I take the monthly mortgage premium as a good measurement of how much more the high end will have to fall compare to the low end right now.
August 8, 2008 at 1:13 PM #254910an
Participant226k in 95 for 2100 sq-ft house in SV is as expected. 2100 sq-ft house in CV goes for around 300k back then and 1500 sq-ft house in MM goes for around 150k at the time.
Since interest rate at the time were around 10%, you’re looking at payment of ~$2k/month for SV, ~$2600/month for CV, and $1300/month for MM house. If you reduce the interest back down to 6% like it is today, in order to achieve the same monthly payment, you’ll be looking at $350k for the SV house, $440k for the CV house, and $220k for the MM house. If you just add in 3% inflation, you might be able to guess where that # would be in today’s $. Personally, I take the monthly mortgage premium as a good measurement of how much more the high end will have to fall compare to the low end right now.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.
