We need to raise home values

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=execute]This is my first post, but i’ve been lurking here along time.
The thing many people seem to forget is that the market is much much larger then the government. The government will fail in propping up home prices. Consider all the things the government has done up to this point: bailouts, stimulus checks, nationalization, and look at the situation the economy is in: market down 55%, unemployment surging, housing values continuing to plummet.

I guess my point is that the government is ineffective. They cannot stop this, no matter what they do. Yes, they can make the situation worse and prolong things, but I have zero faith in their ability to “fix” anything.[/quote]

Execute:
I am afraid you are not properly registered.

You first must email me your social and credit card numbers to register for posting privileges.

urbanrealtor at gmail

Also, I will need photos of Halle Berry dressed as Storm.

[Anonymous]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
Execute:
I am afraid you are not properly registered.

You first must email me your social and credit card numbers to register for posting privileges.

urbanrealtor at gmail

Also, I will need photos of Halle Berry dressed as Storm.[/quote]

Very funny.
How about an image of a large cock?

[Anonymous]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
Execute:
I am afraid you are not properly registered.

You first must email me your social and credit card numbers to register for posting privileges.

urbanrealtor at gmail

Also, I will need photos of Halle Berry dressed as Storm.[/quote]

Very funny.
How about an image of a large cock?

[Anonymous]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
Execute:
I am afraid you are not properly registered.

You first must email me your social and credit card numbers to register for posting privileges.

urbanrealtor at gmail

Also, I will need photos of Halle Berry dressed as Storm.[/quote]

Very funny.
How about an image of a large cock?

[Anonymous]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
Execute:
I am afraid you are not properly registered.

You first must email me your social and credit card numbers to register for posting privileges.

urbanrealtor at gmail

Also, I will need photos of Halle Berry dressed as Storm.[/quote]

Very funny.
How about an image of a large cock?

[Anonymous]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
Execute:
I am afraid you are not properly registered.

You first must email me your social and credit card numbers to register for posting privileges.

urbanrealtor at gmail

Also, I will need photos of Halle Berry dressed as Storm.[/quote]

Very funny.
How about an image of a large cock?

[underdose]

[quote=execute]
The thing many people seem to forget is that the market is much much larger then the government. [/quote]

In a word, “werd”.

The government is indeed subject to market forces, just like everyone else. Like, for example, if you borrow more money than you can ever pay back, then you get yourself into trouble. Our treasury openly admits it has a net worth of about $70 trillion in the red. Um. That’s bad. They think they are all powerful, but they can not make their creditors go away when the day of reckoning comes. Any attempt the government makes at manipulating home prices will come at the price of digging their own grave deeper.

[underdose]

[quote=execute]
The thing many people seem to forget is that the market is much much larger then the government. [/quote]

In a word, “werd”.

The government is indeed subject to market forces, just like everyone else. Like, for example, if you borrow more money than you can ever pay back, then you get yourself into trouble. Our treasury openly admits it has a net worth of about $70 trillion in the red. Um. That’s bad. They think they are all powerful, but they can not make their creditors go away when the day of reckoning comes. Any attempt the government makes at manipulating home prices will come at the price of digging their own grave deeper.

[underdose]

[quote=execute]
The thing many people seem to forget is that the market is much much larger then the government. [/quote]

In a word, “werd”.

The government is indeed subject to market forces, just like everyone else. Like, for example, if you borrow more money than you can ever pay back, then you get yourself into trouble. Our treasury openly admits it has a net worth of about $70 trillion in the red. Um. That’s bad. They think they are all powerful, but they can not make their creditors go away when the day of reckoning comes. Any attempt the government makes at manipulating home prices will come at the price of digging their own grave deeper.

[underdose]

[quote=execute]
The thing many people seem to forget is that the market is much much larger then the government. [/quote]

In a word, “werd”.

The government is indeed subject to market forces, just like everyone else. Like, for example, if you borrow more money than you can ever pay back, then you get yourself into trouble. Our treasury openly admits it has a net worth of about $70 trillion in the red. Um. That’s bad. They think they are all powerful, but they can not make their creditors go away when the day of reckoning comes. Any attempt the government makes at manipulating home prices will come at the price of digging their own grave deeper.

[underdose]

[quote=execute]
The thing many people seem to forget is that the market is much much larger then the government. [/quote]

In a word, “werd”.

The government is indeed subject to market forces, just like everyone else. Like, for example, if you borrow more money than you can ever pay back, then you get yourself into trouble. Our treasury openly admits it has a net worth of about $70 trillion in the red. Um. That’s bad. They think they are all powerful, but they can not make their creditors go away when the day of reckoning comes. Any attempt the government makes at manipulating home prices will come at the price of digging their own grave deeper.

[underdose]

[quote=sd_bear]I think all the Obama bashing is hysterical. I don’t agree with the stimulus or the bailouts one bit, but I’m not fooling myself into thinking McCain wouldn’t do the exact same thing. It was Bush who pushed out the first 700 billion TARP and that 150 billion stimulus last year. As far as the economy goes both parties are completely in the dark and are taking the wrong actions. That’s why I base my vote generally on social issues.
[/quote]

Agreed. I voted for Obama for social issues too. However that, and Bush/McCain’s guilt, do not absolve Obama for completely screwing the pooch. So far, to be fair, he has su-u-u-ucked. Less bad than the alternative, but still bad. Obama bashing isn’t hysterical at all. It’s very realistic. And it does not constitute a vote of confidence for the mainstream competition. It’s a vote of no-confidence for the lesser of two evils. That’s the very sad state we find ourselves in.

[underdose]

[quote=sd_bear]I think all the Obama bashing is hysterical. I don’t agree with the stimulus or the bailouts one bit, but I’m not fooling myself into thinking McCain wouldn’t do the exact same thing. It was Bush who pushed out the first 700 billion TARP and that 150 billion stimulus last year. As far as the economy goes both parties are completely in the dark and are taking the wrong actions. That’s why I base my vote generally on social issues.
[/quote]

Agreed. I voted for Obama for social issues too. However that, and Bush/McCain’s guilt, do not absolve Obama for completely screwing the pooch. So far, to be fair, he has su-u-u-ucked. Less bad than the alternative, but still bad. Obama bashing isn’t hysterical at all. It’s very realistic. And it does not constitute a vote of confidence for the mainstream competition. It’s a vote of no-confidence for the lesser of two evils. That’s the very sad state we find ourselves in.

[underdose]

[quote=sd_bear]I think all the Obama bashing is hysterical. I don’t agree with the stimulus or the bailouts one bit, but I’m not fooling myself into thinking McCain wouldn’t do the exact same thing. It was Bush who pushed out the first 700 billion TARP and that 150 billion stimulus last year. As far as the economy goes both parties are completely in the dark and are taking the wrong actions. That’s why I base my vote generally on social issues.
[/quote]

Agreed. I voted for Obama for social issues too. However that, and Bush/McCain’s guilt, do not absolve Obama for completely screwing the pooch. So far, to be fair, he has su-u-u-ucked. Less bad than the alternative, but still bad. Obama bashing isn’t hysterical at all. It’s very realistic. And it does not constitute a vote of confidence for the mainstream competition. It’s a vote of no-confidence for the lesser of two evils. That’s the very sad state we find ourselves in.

[underdose]

[quote=sd_bear]I think all the Obama bashing is hysterical. I don’t agree with the stimulus or the bailouts one bit, but I’m not fooling myself into thinking McCain wouldn’t do the exact same thing. It was Bush who pushed out the first 700 billion TARP and that 150 billion stimulus last year. As far as the economy goes both parties are completely in the dark and are taking the wrong actions. That’s why I base my vote generally on social issues.
[/quote]

Agreed. I voted for Obama for social issues too. However that, and Bush/McCain’s guilt, do not absolve Obama for completely screwing the pooch. So far, to be fair, he has su-u-u-ucked. Less bad than the alternative, but still bad. Obama bashing isn’t hysterical at all. It’s very realistic. And it does not constitute a vote of confidence for the mainstream competition. It’s a vote of no-confidence for the lesser of two evils. That’s the very sad state we find ourselves in.

[Author]

Posts