- This topic has 485 replies, 32 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 9 months ago by
JWM in SD.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 4, 2008 at 8:10 AM #164231March 4, 2008 at 8:22 AM #163847
JWM in SD
ParticipantJWM in SD
Don’t make me laugh Raybyrnes. Did you actually read his posts? He basically said it was impossible to time an RE purchase. We know that is not true. I have a MM acct that yields almost 5 percent. Why would I put my money into a deflating asset?Regarding your theory on buying the REO at 700k vs. 1.2m…it really isn’t worth 1.2m and the rent would not be commensurate.
March 4, 2008 at 8:22 AM #164158JWM in SD
ParticipantJWM in SD
Don’t make me laugh Raybyrnes. Did you actually read his posts? He basically said it was impossible to time an RE purchase. We know that is not true. I have a MM acct that yields almost 5 percent. Why would I put my money into a deflating asset?Regarding your theory on buying the REO at 700k vs. 1.2m…it really isn’t worth 1.2m and the rent would not be commensurate.
March 4, 2008 at 8:22 AM #164169JWM in SD
ParticipantJWM in SD
Don’t make me laugh Raybyrnes. Did you actually read his posts? He basically said it was impossible to time an RE purchase. We know that is not true. I have a MM acct that yields almost 5 percent. Why would I put my money into a deflating asset?Regarding your theory on buying the REO at 700k vs. 1.2m…it really isn’t worth 1.2m and the rent would not be commensurate.
March 4, 2008 at 8:22 AM #164177JWM in SD
ParticipantJWM in SD
Don’t make me laugh Raybyrnes. Did you actually read his posts? He basically said it was impossible to time an RE purchase. We know that is not true. I have a MM acct that yields almost 5 percent. Why would I put my money into a deflating asset?Regarding your theory on buying the REO at 700k vs. 1.2m…it really isn’t worth 1.2m and the rent would not be commensurate.
March 4, 2008 at 8:22 AM #164261JWM in SD
ParticipantJWM in SD
Don’t make me laugh Raybyrnes. Did you actually read his posts? He basically said it was impossible to time an RE purchase. We know that is not true. I have a MM acct that yields almost 5 percent. Why would I put my money into a deflating asset?Regarding your theory on buying the REO at 700k vs. 1.2m…it really isn’t worth 1.2m and the rent would not be commensurate.
March 4, 2008 at 8:30 AM #163851Raybyrnes
ParticipantCan’t have it both ways.
People argue that real esate does not move as fast as the stock market yet it moved way faster than the stock market on the upside and has been moving way faster than the market on the downside. One might measure this in terms of velocity.
This is the data.
So if it is moving as fast or faster than the stock market how are you suggesting that it can be timed. Almost all data suggests that market timers are inefficient and will trail returns of long term investors.
March 4, 2008 at 8:30 AM #164164Raybyrnes
ParticipantCan’t have it both ways.
People argue that real esate does not move as fast as the stock market yet it moved way faster than the stock market on the upside and has been moving way faster than the market on the downside. One might measure this in terms of velocity.
This is the data.
So if it is moving as fast or faster than the stock market how are you suggesting that it can be timed. Almost all data suggests that market timers are inefficient and will trail returns of long term investors.
March 4, 2008 at 8:30 AM #164175Raybyrnes
ParticipantCan’t have it both ways.
People argue that real esate does not move as fast as the stock market yet it moved way faster than the stock market on the upside and has been moving way faster than the market on the downside. One might measure this in terms of velocity.
This is the data.
So if it is moving as fast or faster than the stock market how are you suggesting that it can be timed. Almost all data suggests that market timers are inefficient and will trail returns of long term investors.
March 4, 2008 at 8:30 AM #164182Raybyrnes
ParticipantCan’t have it both ways.
People argue that real esate does not move as fast as the stock market yet it moved way faster than the stock market on the upside and has been moving way faster than the market on the downside. One might measure this in terms of velocity.
This is the data.
So if it is moving as fast or faster than the stock market how are you suggesting that it can be timed. Almost all data suggests that market timers are inefficient and will trail returns of long term investors.
March 4, 2008 at 8:30 AM #164266Raybyrnes
ParticipantCan’t have it both ways.
People argue that real esate does not move as fast as the stock market yet it moved way faster than the stock market on the upside and has been moving way faster than the market on the downside. One might measure this in terms of velocity.
This is the data.
So if it is moving as fast or faster than the stock market how are you suggesting that it can be timed. Almost all data suggests that market timers are inefficient and will trail returns of long term investors.
March 4, 2008 at 8:45 AM #163858patientlywaiting
ParticipantInvesting in RE might yield a modicum of a return right now if you assume that the real estate will not lose value. But it does. Is that fact taken into the ROI calculation?
March 4, 2008 at 8:45 AM #164168patientlywaiting
ParticipantInvesting in RE might yield a modicum of a return right now if you assume that the real estate will not lose value. But it does. Is that fact taken into the ROI calculation?
March 4, 2008 at 8:45 AM #164180patientlywaiting
ParticipantInvesting in RE might yield a modicum of a return right now if you assume that the real estate will not lose value. But it does. Is that fact taken into the ROI calculation?
March 4, 2008 at 8:45 AM #164190patientlywaiting
ParticipantInvesting in RE might yield a modicum of a return right now if you assume that the real estate will not lose value. But it does. Is that fact taken into the ROI calculation?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
