- This topic has 485 replies, 32 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by JWM in SD.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 4, 2008 at 8:10 AM #164231March 4, 2008 at 8:22 AM #163847JWM in SDParticipant
JWM in SD
Don’t make me laugh Raybyrnes. Did you actually read his posts? He basically said it was impossible to time an RE purchase. We know that is not true. I have a MM acct that yields almost 5 percent. Why would I put my money into a deflating asset?Regarding your theory on buying the REO at 700k vs. 1.2m…it really isn’t worth 1.2m and the rent would not be commensurate.
March 4, 2008 at 8:22 AM #164158JWM in SDParticipantJWM in SD
Don’t make me laugh Raybyrnes. Did you actually read his posts? He basically said it was impossible to time an RE purchase. We know that is not true. I have a MM acct that yields almost 5 percent. Why would I put my money into a deflating asset?Regarding your theory on buying the REO at 700k vs. 1.2m…it really isn’t worth 1.2m and the rent would not be commensurate.
March 4, 2008 at 8:22 AM #164169JWM in SDParticipantJWM in SD
Don’t make me laugh Raybyrnes. Did you actually read his posts? He basically said it was impossible to time an RE purchase. We know that is not true. I have a MM acct that yields almost 5 percent. Why would I put my money into a deflating asset?Regarding your theory on buying the REO at 700k vs. 1.2m…it really isn’t worth 1.2m and the rent would not be commensurate.
March 4, 2008 at 8:22 AM #164177JWM in SDParticipantJWM in SD
Don’t make me laugh Raybyrnes. Did you actually read his posts? He basically said it was impossible to time an RE purchase. We know that is not true. I have a MM acct that yields almost 5 percent. Why would I put my money into a deflating asset?Regarding your theory on buying the REO at 700k vs. 1.2m…it really isn’t worth 1.2m and the rent would not be commensurate.
March 4, 2008 at 8:22 AM #164261JWM in SDParticipantJWM in SD
Don’t make me laugh Raybyrnes. Did you actually read his posts? He basically said it was impossible to time an RE purchase. We know that is not true. I have a MM acct that yields almost 5 percent. Why would I put my money into a deflating asset?Regarding your theory on buying the REO at 700k vs. 1.2m…it really isn’t worth 1.2m and the rent would not be commensurate.
March 4, 2008 at 8:30 AM #163851RaybyrnesParticipantCan’t have it both ways.
People argue that real esate does not move as fast as the stock market yet it moved way faster than the stock market on the upside and has been moving way faster than the market on the downside. One might measure this in terms of velocity.
This is the data.
So if it is moving as fast or faster than the stock market how are you suggesting that it can be timed. Almost all data suggests that market timers are inefficient and will trail returns of long term investors.
March 4, 2008 at 8:30 AM #164164RaybyrnesParticipantCan’t have it both ways.
People argue that real esate does not move as fast as the stock market yet it moved way faster than the stock market on the upside and has been moving way faster than the market on the downside. One might measure this in terms of velocity.
This is the data.
So if it is moving as fast or faster than the stock market how are you suggesting that it can be timed. Almost all data suggests that market timers are inefficient and will trail returns of long term investors.
March 4, 2008 at 8:30 AM #164175RaybyrnesParticipantCan’t have it both ways.
People argue that real esate does not move as fast as the stock market yet it moved way faster than the stock market on the upside and has been moving way faster than the market on the downside. One might measure this in terms of velocity.
This is the data.
So if it is moving as fast or faster than the stock market how are you suggesting that it can be timed. Almost all data suggests that market timers are inefficient and will trail returns of long term investors.
March 4, 2008 at 8:30 AM #164182RaybyrnesParticipantCan’t have it both ways.
People argue that real esate does not move as fast as the stock market yet it moved way faster than the stock market on the upside and has been moving way faster than the market on the downside. One might measure this in terms of velocity.
This is the data.
So if it is moving as fast or faster than the stock market how are you suggesting that it can be timed. Almost all data suggests that market timers are inefficient and will trail returns of long term investors.
March 4, 2008 at 8:30 AM #164266RaybyrnesParticipantCan’t have it both ways.
People argue that real esate does not move as fast as the stock market yet it moved way faster than the stock market on the upside and has been moving way faster than the market on the downside. One might measure this in terms of velocity.
This is the data.
So if it is moving as fast or faster than the stock market how are you suggesting that it can be timed. Almost all data suggests that market timers are inefficient and will trail returns of long term investors.
March 4, 2008 at 8:45 AM #163858patientlywaitingParticipantInvesting in RE might yield a modicum of a return right now if you assume that the real estate will not lose value. But it does. Is that fact taken into the ROI calculation?
March 4, 2008 at 8:45 AM #164168patientlywaitingParticipantInvesting in RE might yield a modicum of a return right now if you assume that the real estate will not lose value. But it does. Is that fact taken into the ROI calculation?
March 4, 2008 at 8:45 AM #164180patientlywaitingParticipantInvesting in RE might yield a modicum of a return right now if you assume that the real estate will not lose value. But it does. Is that fact taken into the ROI calculation?
March 4, 2008 at 8:45 AM #164190patientlywaitingParticipantInvesting in RE might yield a modicum of a return right now if you assume that the real estate will not lose value. But it does. Is that fact taken into the ROI calculation?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.