- This topic has 40 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by
paramount.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 8, 2009 at 10:55 PM #16315September 8, 2009 at 11:02 PM #454453
Zeitgeist
ParticipantI predict a lot of pensioners will leave this State and head for one with lower taxes, better infrastructure, plentiful water and responsive government. The sunshine dollars only go so far.
September 8, 2009 at 11:02 PM #454648Zeitgeist
ParticipantI predict a lot of pensioners will leave this State and head for one with lower taxes, better infrastructure, plentiful water and responsive government. The sunshine dollars only go so far.
September 8, 2009 at 11:02 PM #454989Zeitgeist
ParticipantI predict a lot of pensioners will leave this State and head for one with lower taxes, better infrastructure, plentiful water and responsive government. The sunshine dollars only go so far.
September 8, 2009 at 11:02 PM #455060Zeitgeist
ParticipantI predict a lot of pensioners will leave this State and head for one with lower taxes, better infrastructure, plentiful water and responsive government. The sunshine dollars only go so far.
September 8, 2009 at 11:02 PM #455254Zeitgeist
ParticipantI predict a lot of pensioners will leave this State and head for one with lower taxes, better infrastructure, plentiful water and responsive government. The sunshine dollars only go so far.
September 9, 2009 at 7:56 AM #454488scaredyclassic
Participantthe state; heck, they’ll probly take their dollars tax free overseas.
September 9, 2009 at 7:56 AM #454683scaredyclassic
Participantthe state; heck, they’ll probly take their dollars tax free overseas.
September 9, 2009 at 7:56 AM #455023scaredyclassic
Participantthe state; heck, they’ll probly take their dollars tax free overseas.
September 9, 2009 at 7:56 AM #455097scaredyclassic
Participantthe state; heck, they’ll probly take their dollars tax free overseas.
September 9, 2009 at 7:56 AM #455289scaredyclassic
Participantthe state; heck, they’ll probly take their dollars tax free overseas.
September 9, 2009 at 11:02 AM #454608DWCAP
ParticipantI dont mind the city raising water rates, IF (I know I know only in lala land) they also lowered the set fees they charge.
In my last water bill, the cost of the actual water was 12% of the bill. The rest was just a bunch of set connection/sewer fees. If they really wanted to increase water savings, triple the cost of water, but cut the fees. Reward the people who are responsible and reduce their need for services/inpact on environment; and let the people who want to flood irrigate their grass or shave while the water runs pay the true cost of doing so.
But that will never happen, theyll just add more fees for everyone.
September 9, 2009 at 11:02 AM #454802DWCAP
ParticipantI dont mind the city raising water rates, IF (I know I know only in lala land) they also lowered the set fees they charge.
In my last water bill, the cost of the actual water was 12% of the bill. The rest was just a bunch of set connection/sewer fees. If they really wanted to increase water savings, triple the cost of water, but cut the fees. Reward the people who are responsible and reduce their need for services/inpact on environment; and let the people who want to flood irrigate their grass or shave while the water runs pay the true cost of doing so.
But that will never happen, theyll just add more fees for everyone.
September 9, 2009 at 11:02 AM #455144DWCAP
ParticipantI dont mind the city raising water rates, IF (I know I know only in lala land) they also lowered the set fees they charge.
In my last water bill, the cost of the actual water was 12% of the bill. The rest was just a bunch of set connection/sewer fees. If they really wanted to increase water savings, triple the cost of water, but cut the fees. Reward the people who are responsible and reduce their need for services/inpact on environment; and let the people who want to flood irrigate their grass or shave while the water runs pay the true cost of doing so.
But that will never happen, theyll just add more fees for everyone.
September 9, 2009 at 11:02 AM #455215DWCAP
ParticipantI dont mind the city raising water rates, IF (I know I know only in lala land) they also lowered the set fees they charge.
In my last water bill, the cost of the actual water was 12% of the bill. The rest was just a bunch of set connection/sewer fees. If they really wanted to increase water savings, triple the cost of water, but cut the fees. Reward the people who are responsible and reduce their need for services/inpact on environment; and let the people who want to flood irrigate their grass or shave while the water runs pay the true cost of doing so.
But that will never happen, theyll just add more fees for everyone.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
