- This topic has 565 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 7 months ago by scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 11, 2010 at 8:37 AM #550122May 11, 2010 at 9:20 AM #549154briansd1Guest
[quote=scaredycat] everything in this world has a price. the moral component has probably been quanitified, spliced diced and tranched, and the banks know exactly what that component is worth.[/quote]
After all the banks were doing God’s work. They had PhDs and super duper computers to tell them exactly what everything was worth. Everything was priced into the securities.
I don’t have much sympathy for the banks who already charged for the risk premium, then after the fact, they come back and say “Opps, we didn’t charge enough for the risk.”
May 11, 2010 at 9:20 AM #549265briansd1Guest[quote=scaredycat] everything in this world has a price. the moral component has probably been quanitified, spliced diced and tranched, and the banks know exactly what that component is worth.[/quote]
After all the banks were doing God’s work. They had PhDs and super duper computers to tell them exactly what everything was worth. Everything was priced into the securities.
I don’t have much sympathy for the banks who already charged for the risk premium, then after the fact, they come back and say “Opps, we didn’t charge enough for the risk.”
May 11, 2010 at 9:20 AM #549755briansd1Guest[quote=scaredycat] everything in this world has a price. the moral component has probably been quanitified, spliced diced and tranched, and the banks know exactly what that component is worth.[/quote]
After all the banks were doing God’s work. They had PhDs and super duper computers to tell them exactly what everything was worth. Everything was priced into the securities.
I don’t have much sympathy for the banks who already charged for the risk premium, then after the fact, they come back and say “Opps, we didn’t charge enough for the risk.”
May 11, 2010 at 9:20 AM #549855briansd1Guest[quote=scaredycat] everything in this world has a price. the moral component has probably been quanitified, spliced diced and tranched, and the banks know exactly what that component is worth.[/quote]
After all the banks were doing God’s work. They had PhDs and super duper computers to tell them exactly what everything was worth. Everything was priced into the securities.
I don’t have much sympathy for the banks who already charged for the risk premium, then after the fact, they come back and say “Opps, we didn’t charge enough for the risk.”
May 11, 2010 at 9:20 AM #550135briansd1Guest[quote=scaredycat] everything in this world has a price. the moral component has probably been quanitified, spliced diced and tranched, and the banks know exactly what that component is worth.[/quote]
After all the banks were doing God’s work. They had PhDs and super duper computers to tell them exactly what everything was worth. Everything was priced into the securities.
I don’t have much sympathy for the banks who already charged for the risk premium, then after the fact, they come back and say “Opps, we didn’t charge enough for the risk.”
May 11, 2010 at 9:38 AM #549159La Jolla RenterParticipantMaybe it is a moral obligation to walk away… make the banks, agents, appraisers, investors, and politicians pay dearly for the mess 99% of them created.
Maybe walking away is a moral obligation for the betterment of future generations.
Your house is a place to live in. A place to retire in (without monthly payments). It is not an atm machine to live beyond your means. It is not a place to pull money out so you can go speculate, flip properties and buy a hummer.
I say out with:location, location, location.
and in with: walk, walk, walk
better yet: 30 yr amortization, 30 yr amortization,
30 yr amortization.FYI, I have mortgages, I rent, I’m a landlord, I have done well investing in 1st and 2nd trust deeds. I have recently been “walked on” on a 1st trust deed that I hold.
I still say walk away.
May 11, 2010 at 9:38 AM #549269La Jolla RenterParticipantMaybe it is a moral obligation to walk away… make the banks, agents, appraisers, investors, and politicians pay dearly for the mess 99% of them created.
Maybe walking away is a moral obligation for the betterment of future generations.
Your house is a place to live in. A place to retire in (without monthly payments). It is not an atm machine to live beyond your means. It is not a place to pull money out so you can go speculate, flip properties and buy a hummer.
I say out with:location, location, location.
and in with: walk, walk, walk
better yet: 30 yr amortization, 30 yr amortization,
30 yr amortization.FYI, I have mortgages, I rent, I’m a landlord, I have done well investing in 1st and 2nd trust deeds. I have recently been “walked on” on a 1st trust deed that I hold.
I still say walk away.
May 11, 2010 at 9:38 AM #549760La Jolla RenterParticipantMaybe it is a moral obligation to walk away… make the banks, agents, appraisers, investors, and politicians pay dearly for the mess 99% of them created.
Maybe walking away is a moral obligation for the betterment of future generations.
Your house is a place to live in. A place to retire in (without monthly payments). It is not an atm machine to live beyond your means. It is not a place to pull money out so you can go speculate, flip properties and buy a hummer.
I say out with:location, location, location.
and in with: walk, walk, walk
better yet: 30 yr amortization, 30 yr amortization,
30 yr amortization.FYI, I have mortgages, I rent, I’m a landlord, I have done well investing in 1st and 2nd trust deeds. I have recently been “walked on” on a 1st trust deed that I hold.
I still say walk away.
May 11, 2010 at 9:38 AM #549860La Jolla RenterParticipantMaybe it is a moral obligation to walk away… make the banks, agents, appraisers, investors, and politicians pay dearly for the mess 99% of them created.
Maybe walking away is a moral obligation for the betterment of future generations.
Your house is a place to live in. A place to retire in (without monthly payments). It is not an atm machine to live beyond your means. It is not a place to pull money out so you can go speculate, flip properties and buy a hummer.
I say out with:location, location, location.
and in with: walk, walk, walk
better yet: 30 yr amortization, 30 yr amortization,
30 yr amortization.FYI, I have mortgages, I rent, I’m a landlord, I have done well investing in 1st and 2nd trust deeds. I have recently been “walked on” on a 1st trust deed that I hold.
I still say walk away.
May 11, 2010 at 9:38 AM #550140La Jolla RenterParticipantMaybe it is a moral obligation to walk away… make the banks, agents, appraisers, investors, and politicians pay dearly for the mess 99% of them created.
Maybe walking away is a moral obligation for the betterment of future generations.
Your house is a place to live in. A place to retire in (without monthly payments). It is not an atm machine to live beyond your means. It is not a place to pull money out so you can go speculate, flip properties and buy a hummer.
I say out with:location, location, location.
and in with: walk, walk, walk
better yet: 30 yr amortization, 30 yr amortization,
30 yr amortization.FYI, I have mortgages, I rent, I’m a landlord, I have done well investing in 1st and 2nd trust deeds. I have recently been “walked on” on a 1st trust deed that I hold.
I still say walk away.
May 11, 2010 at 9:46 AM #549164daveljParticipant[quote=Arraya]Dave, what does “fault” have to do with anything. Nobody makes a decision on whether to keep bubble priced home based on “fault” of a poor market timing decision, that is ridiculous. If they want to and do not, it is not because of the righteousness of unnecessarily punishing themselves for a poor market timing decision. That would be masochistic and insane. [/quote]
This is where we differ and will likely never agree. I’m old fashioned when it comes to debt repayment (and meeting obligations in general where one’s word has been given). I will meet every financial obligation I have, regardless of the inconvenience to me, and regardless of what I could game out of the agreement, right up to the point of having to declare bankruptcy. At that point, the jig is up – there’s a complete inability to pay. No other choice. But prior to that point, I’ll pay. No matter what. I don’t care how many times the loan has been sliced and diced and sold or who owns it – my word is my bond. Period.
If that’s masochistic and insane, then so be it. I try my best to do business with others who are masochistic and insane like me.
May 11, 2010 at 9:46 AM #549275daveljParticipant[quote=Arraya]Dave, what does “fault” have to do with anything. Nobody makes a decision on whether to keep bubble priced home based on “fault” of a poor market timing decision, that is ridiculous. If they want to and do not, it is not because of the righteousness of unnecessarily punishing themselves for a poor market timing decision. That would be masochistic and insane. [/quote]
This is where we differ and will likely never agree. I’m old fashioned when it comes to debt repayment (and meeting obligations in general where one’s word has been given). I will meet every financial obligation I have, regardless of the inconvenience to me, and regardless of what I could game out of the agreement, right up to the point of having to declare bankruptcy. At that point, the jig is up – there’s a complete inability to pay. No other choice. But prior to that point, I’ll pay. No matter what. I don’t care how many times the loan has been sliced and diced and sold or who owns it – my word is my bond. Period.
If that’s masochistic and insane, then so be it. I try my best to do business with others who are masochistic and insane like me.
May 11, 2010 at 9:46 AM #549765daveljParticipant[quote=Arraya]Dave, what does “fault” have to do with anything. Nobody makes a decision on whether to keep bubble priced home based on “fault” of a poor market timing decision, that is ridiculous. If they want to and do not, it is not because of the righteousness of unnecessarily punishing themselves for a poor market timing decision. That would be masochistic and insane. [/quote]
This is where we differ and will likely never agree. I’m old fashioned when it comes to debt repayment (and meeting obligations in general where one’s word has been given). I will meet every financial obligation I have, regardless of the inconvenience to me, and regardless of what I could game out of the agreement, right up to the point of having to declare bankruptcy. At that point, the jig is up – there’s a complete inability to pay. No other choice. But prior to that point, I’ll pay. No matter what. I don’t care how many times the loan has been sliced and diced and sold or who owns it – my word is my bond. Period.
If that’s masochistic and insane, then so be it. I try my best to do business with others who are masochistic and insane like me.
May 11, 2010 at 9:46 AM #549865daveljParticipant[quote=Arraya]Dave, what does “fault” have to do with anything. Nobody makes a decision on whether to keep bubble priced home based on “fault” of a poor market timing decision, that is ridiculous. If they want to and do not, it is not because of the righteousness of unnecessarily punishing themselves for a poor market timing decision. That would be masochistic and insane. [/quote]
This is where we differ and will likely never agree. I’m old fashioned when it comes to debt repayment (and meeting obligations in general where one’s word has been given). I will meet every financial obligation I have, regardless of the inconvenience to me, and regardless of what I could game out of the agreement, right up to the point of having to declare bankruptcy. At that point, the jig is up – there’s a complete inability to pay. No other choice. But prior to that point, I’ll pay. No matter what. I don’t care how many times the loan has been sliced and diced and sold or who owns it – my word is my bond. Period.
If that’s masochistic and insane, then so be it. I try my best to do business with others who are masochistic and insane like me.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.