- This topic has 565 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by
scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 12, 2010 at 1:51 PM #591187August 12, 2010 at 2:27 PM #590154
carlsbadworker
ParticipantStrategic default is a dagger at the heart of mortgage underwriting standard. Because all they looked at was one’s ability to pay not the willingness to pay. The failure to distinguish between the two is a time bomb hidden under all the recent FHA lending to borrowers using 8K credit as DP.
August 12, 2010 at 2:27 PM #590247carlsbadworker
ParticipantStrategic default is a dagger at the heart of mortgage underwriting standard. Because all they looked at was one’s ability to pay not the willingness to pay. The failure to distinguish between the two is a time bomb hidden under all the recent FHA lending to borrowers using 8K credit as DP.
August 12, 2010 at 2:27 PM #590782carlsbadworker
ParticipantStrategic default is a dagger at the heart of mortgage underwriting standard. Because all they looked at was one’s ability to pay not the willingness to pay. The failure to distinguish between the two is a time bomb hidden under all the recent FHA lending to borrowers using 8K credit as DP.
August 12, 2010 at 2:27 PM #590891carlsbadworker
ParticipantStrategic default is a dagger at the heart of mortgage underwriting standard. Because all they looked at was one’s ability to pay not the willingness to pay. The failure to distinguish between the two is a time bomb hidden under all the recent FHA lending to borrowers using 8K credit as DP.
August 12, 2010 at 2:27 PM #591202carlsbadworker
ParticipantStrategic default is a dagger at the heart of mortgage underwriting standard. Because all they looked at was one’s ability to pay not the willingness to pay. The failure to distinguish between the two is a time bomb hidden under all the recent FHA lending to borrowers using 8K credit as DP.
August 12, 2010 at 9:33 PM #590284sreeb
ParticipantI take the view that the non recourse nature of the loan is a loan feature just like all the other fine print. Fine print that the bank will not hesitate to take advantage of if it is to their advantage. Handing over the keys and walking is a business decision, not a moral one.
I view staying, forcing foreclosure, and stalling the process while not paying as a clear ethical problem.
I have seen some of loan packages sold to subprime borrowers and find it hard to be too sympathetic to the lenders. 0% down on an adjustable at 7% above the index? How could that ever work out well for the buyer? And how could it ever work out for the holder of 2nd which covered the last 20%.
August 12, 2010 at 9:33 PM #590377sreeb
ParticipantI take the view that the non recourse nature of the loan is a loan feature just like all the other fine print. Fine print that the bank will not hesitate to take advantage of if it is to their advantage. Handing over the keys and walking is a business decision, not a moral one.
I view staying, forcing foreclosure, and stalling the process while not paying as a clear ethical problem.
I have seen some of loan packages sold to subprime borrowers and find it hard to be too sympathetic to the lenders. 0% down on an adjustable at 7% above the index? How could that ever work out well for the buyer? And how could it ever work out for the holder of 2nd which covered the last 20%.
August 12, 2010 at 9:33 PM #590912sreeb
ParticipantI take the view that the non recourse nature of the loan is a loan feature just like all the other fine print. Fine print that the bank will not hesitate to take advantage of if it is to their advantage. Handing over the keys and walking is a business decision, not a moral one.
I view staying, forcing foreclosure, and stalling the process while not paying as a clear ethical problem.
I have seen some of loan packages sold to subprime borrowers and find it hard to be too sympathetic to the lenders. 0% down on an adjustable at 7% above the index? How could that ever work out well for the buyer? And how could it ever work out for the holder of 2nd which covered the last 20%.
August 12, 2010 at 9:33 PM #591021sreeb
ParticipantI take the view that the non recourse nature of the loan is a loan feature just like all the other fine print. Fine print that the bank will not hesitate to take advantage of if it is to their advantage. Handing over the keys and walking is a business decision, not a moral one.
I view staying, forcing foreclosure, and stalling the process while not paying as a clear ethical problem.
I have seen some of loan packages sold to subprime borrowers and find it hard to be too sympathetic to the lenders. 0% down on an adjustable at 7% above the index? How could that ever work out well for the buyer? And how could it ever work out for the holder of 2nd which covered the last 20%.
August 12, 2010 at 9:33 PM #591332sreeb
ParticipantI take the view that the non recourse nature of the loan is a loan feature just like all the other fine print. Fine print that the bank will not hesitate to take advantage of if it is to their advantage. Handing over the keys and walking is a business decision, not a moral one.
I view staying, forcing foreclosure, and stalling the process while not paying as a clear ethical problem.
I have seen some of loan packages sold to subprime borrowers and find it hard to be too sympathetic to the lenders. 0% down on an adjustable at 7% above the index? How could that ever work out well for the buyer? And how could it ever work out for the holder of 2nd which covered the last 20%.
August 13, 2010 at 9:29 AM #590409kev374
ParticipantWhile I don’t think there is anything wrong with strategically defaulting I do think the person who defaults should not be able to buy another home for a VERY long time. Unfortunately it looks like these defaulters can get another home under government programs within 2 yrs.
August 13, 2010 at 9:29 AM #590502kev374
ParticipantWhile I don’t think there is anything wrong with strategically defaulting I do think the person who defaults should not be able to buy another home for a VERY long time. Unfortunately it looks like these defaulters can get another home under government programs within 2 yrs.
August 13, 2010 at 9:29 AM #591038kev374
ParticipantWhile I don’t think there is anything wrong with strategically defaulting I do think the person who defaults should not be able to buy another home for a VERY long time. Unfortunately it looks like these defaulters can get another home under government programs within 2 yrs.
August 13, 2010 at 9:29 AM #591149kev374
ParticipantWhile I don’t think there is anything wrong with strategically defaulting I do think the person who defaults should not be able to buy another home for a VERY long time. Unfortunately it looks like these defaulters can get another home under government programs within 2 yrs.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
