- This topic has 565 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 12, 2010 at 1:51 PM #591187August 12, 2010 at 2:27 PM #590154carlsbadworkerParticipant
Strategic default is a dagger at the heart of mortgage underwriting standard. Because all they looked at was one’s ability to pay not the willingness to pay. The failure to distinguish between the two is a time bomb hidden under all the recent FHA lending to borrowers using 8K credit as DP.
August 12, 2010 at 2:27 PM #590247carlsbadworkerParticipantStrategic default is a dagger at the heart of mortgage underwriting standard. Because all they looked at was one’s ability to pay not the willingness to pay. The failure to distinguish between the two is a time bomb hidden under all the recent FHA lending to borrowers using 8K credit as DP.
August 12, 2010 at 2:27 PM #590782carlsbadworkerParticipantStrategic default is a dagger at the heart of mortgage underwriting standard. Because all they looked at was one’s ability to pay not the willingness to pay. The failure to distinguish between the two is a time bomb hidden under all the recent FHA lending to borrowers using 8K credit as DP.
August 12, 2010 at 2:27 PM #590891carlsbadworkerParticipantStrategic default is a dagger at the heart of mortgage underwriting standard. Because all they looked at was one’s ability to pay not the willingness to pay. The failure to distinguish between the two is a time bomb hidden under all the recent FHA lending to borrowers using 8K credit as DP.
August 12, 2010 at 2:27 PM #591202carlsbadworkerParticipantStrategic default is a dagger at the heart of mortgage underwriting standard. Because all they looked at was one’s ability to pay not the willingness to pay. The failure to distinguish between the two is a time bomb hidden under all the recent FHA lending to borrowers using 8K credit as DP.
August 12, 2010 at 9:33 PM #590284sreebParticipantI take the view that the non recourse nature of the loan is a loan feature just like all the other fine print. Fine print that the bank will not hesitate to take advantage of if it is to their advantage. Handing over the keys and walking is a business decision, not a moral one.
I view staying, forcing foreclosure, and stalling the process while not paying as a clear ethical problem.
I have seen some of loan packages sold to subprime borrowers and find it hard to be too sympathetic to the lenders. 0% down on an adjustable at 7% above the index? How could that ever work out well for the buyer? And how could it ever work out for the holder of 2nd which covered the last 20%.
August 12, 2010 at 9:33 PM #590377sreebParticipantI take the view that the non recourse nature of the loan is a loan feature just like all the other fine print. Fine print that the bank will not hesitate to take advantage of if it is to their advantage. Handing over the keys and walking is a business decision, not a moral one.
I view staying, forcing foreclosure, and stalling the process while not paying as a clear ethical problem.
I have seen some of loan packages sold to subprime borrowers and find it hard to be too sympathetic to the lenders. 0% down on an adjustable at 7% above the index? How could that ever work out well for the buyer? And how could it ever work out for the holder of 2nd which covered the last 20%.
August 12, 2010 at 9:33 PM #590912sreebParticipantI take the view that the non recourse nature of the loan is a loan feature just like all the other fine print. Fine print that the bank will not hesitate to take advantage of if it is to their advantage. Handing over the keys and walking is a business decision, not a moral one.
I view staying, forcing foreclosure, and stalling the process while not paying as a clear ethical problem.
I have seen some of loan packages sold to subprime borrowers and find it hard to be too sympathetic to the lenders. 0% down on an adjustable at 7% above the index? How could that ever work out well for the buyer? And how could it ever work out for the holder of 2nd which covered the last 20%.
August 12, 2010 at 9:33 PM #591021sreebParticipantI take the view that the non recourse nature of the loan is a loan feature just like all the other fine print. Fine print that the bank will not hesitate to take advantage of if it is to their advantage. Handing over the keys and walking is a business decision, not a moral one.
I view staying, forcing foreclosure, and stalling the process while not paying as a clear ethical problem.
I have seen some of loan packages sold to subprime borrowers and find it hard to be too sympathetic to the lenders. 0% down on an adjustable at 7% above the index? How could that ever work out well for the buyer? And how could it ever work out for the holder of 2nd which covered the last 20%.
August 12, 2010 at 9:33 PM #591332sreebParticipantI take the view that the non recourse nature of the loan is a loan feature just like all the other fine print. Fine print that the bank will not hesitate to take advantage of if it is to their advantage. Handing over the keys and walking is a business decision, not a moral one.
I view staying, forcing foreclosure, and stalling the process while not paying as a clear ethical problem.
I have seen some of loan packages sold to subprime borrowers and find it hard to be too sympathetic to the lenders. 0% down on an adjustable at 7% above the index? How could that ever work out well for the buyer? And how could it ever work out for the holder of 2nd which covered the last 20%.
August 13, 2010 at 9:29 AM #590409kev374ParticipantWhile I don’t think there is anything wrong with strategically defaulting I do think the person who defaults should not be able to buy another home for a VERY long time. Unfortunately it looks like these defaulters can get another home under government programs within 2 yrs.
August 13, 2010 at 9:29 AM #590502kev374ParticipantWhile I don’t think there is anything wrong with strategically defaulting I do think the person who defaults should not be able to buy another home for a VERY long time. Unfortunately it looks like these defaulters can get another home under government programs within 2 yrs.
August 13, 2010 at 9:29 AM #591038kev374ParticipantWhile I don’t think there is anything wrong with strategically defaulting I do think the person who defaults should not be able to buy another home for a VERY long time. Unfortunately it looks like these defaulters can get another home under government programs within 2 yrs.
August 13, 2010 at 9:29 AM #591149kev374ParticipantWhile I don’t think there is anything wrong with strategically defaulting I do think the person who defaults should not be able to buy another home for a VERY long time. Unfortunately it looks like these defaulters can get another home under government programs within 2 yrs.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.