- This topic has 450 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 19, 2010 at 4:30 AM #541329April 19, 2010 at 7:40 AM #540410jpinpbParticipant
CAR – I’ve mentioned #1 many times in various threads here and on SDL. That is what started housing to begin it’s climb during the ’90’s, IMO. Housing was hurting for a while and I noticed the improvement, gradual however it was, once that passed.
April 19, 2010 at 7:40 AM #540527jpinpbParticipantCAR – I’ve mentioned #1 many times in various threads here and on SDL. That is what started housing to begin it’s climb during the ’90’s, IMO. Housing was hurting for a while and I noticed the improvement, gradual however it was, once that passed.
April 19, 2010 at 7:40 AM #540996jpinpbParticipantCAR – I’ve mentioned #1 many times in various threads here and on SDL. That is what started housing to begin it’s climb during the ’90’s, IMO. Housing was hurting for a while and I noticed the improvement, gradual however it was, once that passed.
April 19, 2010 at 7:40 AM #541086jpinpbParticipantCAR – I’ve mentioned #1 many times in various threads here and on SDL. That is what started housing to begin it’s climb during the ’90’s, IMO. Housing was hurting for a while and I noticed the improvement, gradual however it was, once that passed.
April 19, 2010 at 7:40 AM #541344jpinpbParticipantCAR – I’ve mentioned #1 many times in various threads here and on SDL. That is what started housing to begin it’s climb during the ’90’s, IMO. Housing was hurting for a while and I noticed the improvement, gradual however it was, once that passed.
April 19, 2010 at 8:28 AM #540430(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=CA renter]
This is my understanding of how the credit bubble grew:
1. The passage of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 …
2. The passage of the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act in 1999 …
3. Greenspan’s lowering of interest rates to historically low levels, then keeping them there for an extended period of time (we’re still there!!!). …
[/quote]
It is interesting to note that ALL of these factors are still in play today, nearly 5 years into the burst of the bubble.
April 19, 2010 at 8:28 AM #540548(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=CA renter]
This is my understanding of how the credit bubble grew:
1. The passage of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 …
2. The passage of the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act in 1999 …
3. Greenspan’s lowering of interest rates to historically low levels, then keeping them there for an extended period of time (we’re still there!!!). …
[/quote]
It is interesting to note that ALL of these factors are still in play today, nearly 5 years into the burst of the bubble.
April 19, 2010 at 8:28 AM #541016(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=CA renter]
This is my understanding of how the credit bubble grew:
1. The passage of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 …
2. The passage of the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act in 1999 …
3. Greenspan’s lowering of interest rates to historically low levels, then keeping them there for an extended period of time (we’re still there!!!). …
[/quote]
It is interesting to note that ALL of these factors are still in play today, nearly 5 years into the burst of the bubble.
April 19, 2010 at 8:28 AM #541106(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=CA renter]
This is my understanding of how the credit bubble grew:
1. The passage of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 …
2. The passage of the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act in 1999 …
3. Greenspan’s lowering of interest rates to historically low levels, then keeping them there for an extended period of time (we’re still there!!!). …
[/quote]
It is interesting to note that ALL of these factors are still in play today, nearly 5 years into the burst of the bubble.
April 19, 2010 at 8:28 AM #541364(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=CA renter]
This is my understanding of how the credit bubble grew:
1. The passage of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 …
2. The passage of the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act in 1999 …
3. Greenspan’s lowering of interest rates to historically low levels, then keeping them there for an extended period of time (we’re still there!!!). …
[/quote]
It is interesting to note that ALL of these factors are still in play today, nearly 5 years into the burst of the bubble.
April 19, 2010 at 11:28 AM #540544smshorttimerParticipantIt’s also been argued that anti-growth/restrictive zoning policies in places such as California contributed quite a bit. Some noted anti-“smart growth” scholar wrote something about this somewhere. Interesting, at least. I’m not sure if his theory works well in a place such as Arizona. Can’t remember his name, but I think Cato published his piece. Could be wrong about that.
April 19, 2010 at 11:28 AM #540664smshorttimerParticipantIt’s also been argued that anti-growth/restrictive zoning policies in places such as California contributed quite a bit. Some noted anti-“smart growth” scholar wrote something about this somewhere. Interesting, at least. I’m not sure if his theory works well in a place such as Arizona. Can’t remember his name, but I think Cato published his piece. Could be wrong about that.
April 19, 2010 at 11:28 AM #541127smshorttimerParticipantIt’s also been argued that anti-growth/restrictive zoning policies in places such as California contributed quite a bit. Some noted anti-“smart growth” scholar wrote something about this somewhere. Interesting, at least. I’m not sure if his theory works well in a place such as Arizona. Can’t remember his name, but I think Cato published his piece. Could be wrong about that.
April 19, 2010 at 11:28 AM #541215smshorttimerParticipantIt’s also been argued that anti-growth/restrictive zoning policies in places such as California contributed quite a bit. Some noted anti-“smart growth” scholar wrote something about this somewhere. Interesting, at least. I’m not sure if his theory works well in a place such as Arizona. Can’t remember his name, but I think Cato published his piece. Could be wrong about that.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.