- This topic has 450 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 15, 2010 at 6:03 PM #540577April 15, 2010 at 6:21 PM #539627
andymajumder
ParticipantCouldn’t agree more….my problem is even my real estate agent sees things from a seller’s perspective, probably because she is a homeowner herself. Statements such as – “this home is a great deal” (just because its down 25% from 2005 peak but yet its twice 2001 price) and “we will be back to 2005 prices in about 5 yrs” were just too much for me. I just had to get rid of her….
April 15, 2010 at 6:21 PM #539748ParticipantCouldn’t agree more….my problem is even my real estate agent sees things from a seller’s perspective, probably because she is a homeowner herself. Statements such as – “this home is a great deal” (just because its down 25% from 2005 peak but yet its twice 2001 price) and “we will be back to 2005 prices in about 5 yrs” were just too much for me. I just had to get rid of her….
April 15, 2010 at 6:21 PM #540218ParticipantCouldn’t agree more….my problem is even my real estate agent sees things from a seller’s perspective, probably because she is a homeowner herself. Statements such as – “this home is a great deal” (just because its down 25% from 2005 peak but yet its twice 2001 price) and “we will be back to 2005 prices in about 5 yrs” were just too much for me. I just had to get rid of her….
April 15, 2010 at 6:21 PM #540313ParticipantCouldn’t agree more….my problem is even my real estate agent sees things from a seller’s perspective, probably because she is a homeowner herself. Statements such as – “this home is a great deal” (just because its down 25% from 2005 peak but yet its twice 2001 price) and “we will be back to 2005 prices in about 5 yrs” were just too much for me. I just had to get rid of her….
April 15, 2010 at 6:21 PM #540582ParticipantCouldn’t agree more….my problem is even my real estate agent sees things from a seller’s perspective, probably because she is a homeowner herself. Statements such as – “this home is a great deal” (just because its down 25% from 2005 peak but yet its twice 2001 price) and “we will be back to 2005 prices in about 5 yrs” were just too much for me. I just had to get rid of her….
April 16, 2010 at 3:32 AM #539642CA renter
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]There you again again CAR with the hyperbole. I sold a townhouse in Encinitas in 1999 for $240K and its worth no more than than $400K today. In fact at the absolute peak it may have sold for $550K with a lucky sale. Please show me one property in NCC that sold for $200K in 2000 that is worth anything close to even you proposed low offer of $650K. Of course we both know that doesnt exist. Properties that sold for $200k in 1997 arent over 600K today, not even close. Price anchoring to 2000 prices is illusory at best.
OK, here’s a perfect example.2807 Sombrosa currently listed for $637,500 and previous sale was in 2000 for $369,000.[/quote]
Sure, here you go:
Sold for $379,900 in 1998, listed for $1,075,000 today.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100019087-209_Jacob_Ln_Encinitas_CA_92024
————–Sold for $225K in 2002, now listed for $650K (no, it won’t sell at this price, but my point is how delusional sellers are about their properties).
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100000450-636_Ezee_Encinitas_CA_92024
———————-Sold in 2000 for $435K, then again to the current sellers for $1,000,000 in 2006 (the peak, right?). Now, they have it listed for $1,175,000. I understand that these sellers don’t have much choice, it’s just what us buyers are having to contend with — they want US to make them whole on their foolish “investments.”
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Encinitas/130-3rd-St-92024/home/4113369
————————-Not sure if the last sale was arms-length or what, but this one sold for $133K in 1998 and is now listed for $1,850,000
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Encinitas/1497-Crest-Dr-92024/home/4153169
——————-This one was bought for $745K in 2002 (after much of the run-up already happened), and is now listed for $1,995,000.
Sold in 1997 for $165K, and is now listed for $1,295,000.
This one sold in **2007** for $1,795,000 — before “The Worst Recession Since the Great Depression” and after the “worst downturn in RE history.” They now have it listed at $2,495,000.
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Cardiff/2338-Oxford-Ave-92007/home/4148546
———————–This one sold for $556,000 in 2000, and is now listed for $1,350,000.
Another deluded seller who bought AT THE PEAK for $935,500 in 2006. It’s now listed for $1,225,000.
Sold for $285K in 1998, now listed for $685K.
Sold for $115K in 1997, now listed for $545K.
Sold for $820K in 2004 (near peak!), and is now listed for $1,596,000.
Sold for $600K in 2003 (again, after much of the run-up), and is now listed for $1,195,000.
When you consider the pathetic amount of inventory out there (thanks to the govt!), and then see examples like the ones above, it’s difficult for a buyer to feel very enthusiastic about the market right now, IMHO.
I know you’re going to claim that these prices are reasonable because the sellers might have put in fancy landscaping or granite countertops, or somesuch, but it’s long been known in the RE industry that you almost never recoup the money spent on “upgrades.” To many buyers, the upgrades don’t really count, because we intend to remodel things to out own liking (otherwise we’d be living in rentals, right?).
April 16, 2010 at 3:32 AM #539763Participant[quote=sdrealtor]There you again again CAR with the hyperbole. I sold a townhouse in Encinitas in 1999 for $240K and its worth no more than than $400K today. In fact at the absolute peak it may have sold for $550K with a lucky sale. Please show me one property in NCC that sold for $200K in 2000 that is worth anything close to even you proposed low offer of $650K. Of course we both know that doesnt exist. Properties that sold for $200k in 1997 arent over 600K today, not even close. Price anchoring to 2000 prices is illusory at best.
OK, here’s a perfect example.2807 Sombrosa currently listed for $637,500 and previous sale was in 2000 for $369,000.[/quote]
Sure, here you go:
Sold for $379,900 in 1998, listed for $1,075,000 today.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100019087-209_Jacob_Ln_Encinitas_CA_92024
————–Sold for $225K in 2002, now listed for $650K (no, it won’t sell at this price, but my point is how delusional sellers are about their properties).
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100000450-636_Ezee_Encinitas_CA_92024
———————-Sold in 2000 for $435K, then again to the current sellers for $1,000,000 in 2006 (the peak, right?). Now, they have it listed for $1,175,000. I understand that these sellers don’t have much choice, it’s just what us buyers are having to contend with — they want US to make them whole on their foolish “investments.”
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Encinitas/130-3rd-St-92024/home/4113369
————————-Not sure if the last sale was arms-length or what, but this one sold for $133K in 1998 and is now listed for $1,850,000
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Encinitas/1497-Crest-Dr-92024/home/4153169
——————-This one was bought for $745K in 2002 (after much of the run-up already happened), and is now listed for $1,995,000.
Sold in 1997 for $165K, and is now listed for $1,295,000.
This one sold in **2007** for $1,795,000 — before “The Worst Recession Since the Great Depression” and after the “worst downturn in RE history.” They now have it listed at $2,495,000.
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Cardiff/2338-Oxford-Ave-92007/home/4148546
———————–This one sold for $556,000 in 2000, and is now listed for $1,350,000.
Another deluded seller who bought AT THE PEAK for $935,500 in 2006. It’s now listed for $1,225,000.
Sold for $285K in 1998, now listed for $685K.
Sold for $115K in 1997, now listed for $545K.
Sold for $820K in 2004 (near peak!), and is now listed for $1,596,000.
Sold for $600K in 2003 (again, after much of the run-up), and is now listed for $1,195,000.
When you consider the pathetic amount of inventory out there (thanks to the govt!), and then see examples like the ones above, it’s difficult for a buyer to feel very enthusiastic about the market right now, IMHO.
I know you’re going to claim that these prices are reasonable because the sellers might have put in fancy landscaping or granite countertops, or somesuch, but it’s long been known in the RE industry that you almost never recoup the money spent on “upgrades.” To many buyers, the upgrades don’t really count, because we intend to remodel things to out own liking (otherwise we’d be living in rentals, right?).
April 16, 2010 at 3:32 AM #540233Participant[quote=sdrealtor]There you again again CAR with the hyperbole. I sold a townhouse in Encinitas in 1999 for $240K and its worth no more than than $400K today. In fact at the absolute peak it may have sold for $550K with a lucky sale. Please show me one property in NCC that sold for $200K in 2000 that is worth anything close to even you proposed low offer of $650K. Of course we both know that doesnt exist. Properties that sold for $200k in 1997 arent over 600K today, not even close. Price anchoring to 2000 prices is illusory at best.
OK, here’s a perfect example.2807 Sombrosa currently listed for $637,500 and previous sale was in 2000 for $369,000.[/quote]
Sure, here you go:
Sold for $379,900 in 1998, listed for $1,075,000 today.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100019087-209_Jacob_Ln_Encinitas_CA_92024
————–Sold for $225K in 2002, now listed for $650K (no, it won’t sell at this price, but my point is how delusional sellers are about their properties).
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100000450-636_Ezee_Encinitas_CA_92024
———————-Sold in 2000 for $435K, then again to the current sellers for $1,000,000 in 2006 (the peak, right?). Now, they have it listed for $1,175,000. I understand that these sellers don’t have much choice, it’s just what us buyers are having to contend with — they want US to make them whole on their foolish “investments.”
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Encinitas/130-3rd-St-92024/home/4113369
————————-Not sure if the last sale was arms-length or what, but this one sold for $133K in 1998 and is now listed for $1,850,000
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Encinitas/1497-Crest-Dr-92024/home/4153169
——————-This one was bought for $745K in 2002 (after much of the run-up already happened), and is now listed for $1,995,000.
Sold in 1997 for $165K, and is now listed for $1,295,000.
This one sold in **2007** for $1,795,000 — before “The Worst Recession Since the Great Depression” and after the “worst downturn in RE history.” They now have it listed at $2,495,000.
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Cardiff/2338-Oxford-Ave-92007/home/4148546
———————–This one sold for $556,000 in 2000, and is now listed for $1,350,000.
Another deluded seller who bought AT THE PEAK for $935,500 in 2006. It’s now listed for $1,225,000.
Sold for $285K in 1998, now listed for $685K.
Sold for $115K in 1997, now listed for $545K.
Sold for $820K in 2004 (near peak!), and is now listed for $1,596,000.
Sold for $600K in 2003 (again, after much of the run-up), and is now listed for $1,195,000.
When you consider the pathetic amount of inventory out there (thanks to the govt!), and then see examples like the ones above, it’s difficult for a buyer to feel very enthusiastic about the market right now, IMHO.
I know you’re going to claim that these prices are reasonable because the sellers might have put in fancy landscaping or granite countertops, or somesuch, but it’s long been known in the RE industry that you almost never recoup the money spent on “upgrades.” To many buyers, the upgrades don’t really count, because we intend to remodel things to out own liking (otherwise we’d be living in rentals, right?).
April 16, 2010 at 3:32 AM #540327Participant[quote=sdrealtor]There you again again CAR with the hyperbole. I sold a townhouse in Encinitas in 1999 for $240K and its worth no more than than $400K today. In fact at the absolute peak it may have sold for $550K with a lucky sale. Please show me one property in NCC that sold for $200K in 2000 that is worth anything close to even you proposed low offer of $650K. Of course we both know that doesnt exist. Properties that sold for $200k in 1997 arent over 600K today, not even close. Price anchoring to 2000 prices is illusory at best.
OK, here’s a perfect example.2807 Sombrosa currently listed for $637,500 and previous sale was in 2000 for $369,000.[/quote]
Sure, here you go:
Sold for $379,900 in 1998, listed for $1,075,000 today.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100019087-209_Jacob_Ln_Encinitas_CA_92024
————–Sold for $225K in 2002, now listed for $650K (no, it won’t sell at this price, but my point is how delusional sellers are about their properties).
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100000450-636_Ezee_Encinitas_CA_92024
———————-Sold in 2000 for $435K, then again to the current sellers for $1,000,000 in 2006 (the peak, right?). Now, they have it listed for $1,175,000. I understand that these sellers don’t have much choice, it’s just what us buyers are having to contend with — they want US to make them whole on their foolish “investments.”
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Encinitas/130-3rd-St-92024/home/4113369
————————-Not sure if the last sale was arms-length or what, but this one sold for $133K in 1998 and is now listed for $1,850,000
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Encinitas/1497-Crest-Dr-92024/home/4153169
——————-This one was bought for $745K in 2002 (after much of the run-up already happened), and is now listed for $1,995,000.
Sold in 1997 for $165K, and is now listed for $1,295,000.
This one sold in **2007** for $1,795,000 — before “The Worst Recession Since the Great Depression” and after the “worst downturn in RE history.” They now have it listed at $2,495,000.
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Cardiff/2338-Oxford-Ave-92007/home/4148546
———————–This one sold for $556,000 in 2000, and is now listed for $1,350,000.
Another deluded seller who bought AT THE PEAK for $935,500 in 2006. It’s now listed for $1,225,000.
Sold for $285K in 1998, now listed for $685K.
Sold for $115K in 1997, now listed for $545K.
Sold for $820K in 2004 (near peak!), and is now listed for $1,596,000.
Sold for $600K in 2003 (again, after much of the run-up), and is now listed for $1,195,000.
When you consider the pathetic amount of inventory out there (thanks to the govt!), and then see examples like the ones above, it’s difficult for a buyer to feel very enthusiastic about the market right now, IMHO.
I know you’re going to claim that these prices are reasonable because the sellers might have put in fancy landscaping or granite countertops, or somesuch, but it’s long been known in the RE industry that you almost never recoup the money spent on “upgrades.” To many buyers, the upgrades don’t really count, because we intend to remodel things to out own liking (otherwise we’d be living in rentals, right?).
April 16, 2010 at 3:32 AM #540597Participant[quote=sdrealtor]There you again again CAR with the hyperbole. I sold a townhouse in Encinitas in 1999 for $240K and its worth no more than than $400K today. In fact at the absolute peak it may have sold for $550K with a lucky sale. Please show me one property in NCC that sold for $200K in 2000 that is worth anything close to even you proposed low offer of $650K. Of course we both know that doesnt exist. Properties that sold for $200k in 1997 arent over 600K today, not even close. Price anchoring to 2000 prices is illusory at best.
OK, here’s a perfect example.2807 Sombrosa currently listed for $637,500 and previous sale was in 2000 for $369,000.[/quote]
Sure, here you go:
Sold for $379,900 in 1998, listed for $1,075,000 today.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100019087-209_Jacob_Ln_Encinitas_CA_92024
————–Sold for $225K in 2002, now listed for $650K (no, it won’t sell at this price, but my point is how delusional sellers are about their properties).
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100000450-636_Ezee_Encinitas_CA_92024
———————-Sold in 2000 for $435K, then again to the current sellers for $1,000,000 in 2006 (the peak, right?). Now, they have it listed for $1,175,000. I understand that these sellers don’t have much choice, it’s just what us buyers are having to contend with — they want US to make them whole on their foolish “investments.”
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Encinitas/130-3rd-St-92024/home/4113369
————————-Not sure if the last sale was arms-length or what, but this one sold for $133K in 1998 and is now listed for $1,850,000
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Encinitas/1497-Crest-Dr-92024/home/4153169
——————-This one was bought for $745K in 2002 (after much of the run-up already happened), and is now listed for $1,995,000.
Sold in 1997 for $165K, and is now listed for $1,295,000.
This one sold in **2007** for $1,795,000 — before “The Worst Recession Since the Great Depression” and after the “worst downturn in RE history.” They now have it listed at $2,495,000.
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Cardiff/2338-Oxford-Ave-92007/home/4148546
———————–This one sold for $556,000 in 2000, and is now listed for $1,350,000.
Another deluded seller who bought AT THE PEAK for $935,500 in 2006. It’s now listed for $1,225,000.
Sold for $285K in 1998, now listed for $685K.
Sold for $115K in 1997, now listed for $545K.
Sold for $820K in 2004 (near peak!), and is now listed for $1,596,000.
Sold for $600K in 2003 (again, after much of the run-up), and is now listed for $1,195,000.
When you consider the pathetic amount of inventory out there (thanks to the govt!), and then see examples like the ones above, it’s difficult for a buyer to feel very enthusiastic about the market right now, IMHO.
I know you’re going to claim that these prices are reasonable because the sellers might have put in fancy landscaping or granite countertops, or somesuch, but it’s long been known in the RE industry that you almost never recoup the money spent on “upgrades.” To many buyers, the upgrades don’t really count, because we intend to remodel things to out own liking (otherwise we’d be living in rentals, right?).
April 16, 2010 at 8:36 AM #539667an
ParticipantCAR, how about these?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100014822-2855_Rancho_Ganadero_St_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/13/2010 $660,000 9y 11m 34% 3%
05/04/2000 $490,900 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100009649-2192_Corte_Arboles_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/09/2010 $790,000 10y 7m 89% 6%
08/23/1999 $418,135 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100005846-7930_Sitio_Granado_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/06/2010 $740,000 10y 4m 73% 5%
11/12/1999 $427,285 n/a – –
————————————————–
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100014021-6225_Paseo_Alta_Rico_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/06/2010 $980,000 7y 12m -15% -2%
04/11/2002 $1,150,000 2y 5m 51% 18%
10/27/1999 $760,273 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100001641-6817_Camino_De_Amigos_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/05/2010 $565,000 9y 6m 77% 6%
09/11/2000 $319,871 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100001126-7867_Grado_Cipreso_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/01/2010 $638,625 8y 3m 45% 5%
12/19/2001 $439,500 3y 1m 38% 11%
11/13/1998 $317,990 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090015161-7237_Almaden_Ln_Carlsbad_CA_92009
03/30/2010 $1,225,000 6y 10m -15% -2%
05/14/2003 $1,440,000 2y 9m 20% 7%
08/16/2000 $1,200,000 11m 100% 113%
09/17/1999 $600,000 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100007826-3103_Rancho_Del_Canon_St_Carlsbad_CA_92009
03/30/2010 $452,000 4y 8m -23% -5%
07/21/2005 $585,000 5y 9m 134% 16%
09/28/1999 $249,594 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090060318-7961_Calle_Posada_Carlsbad_CA_92009
03/30/2010 $450,000 7y 8m 8% 1%
07/17/2002 $415,000 3y 40% 12%
07/09/1999 $297,000 9y 8m 19% 2%
10/12/1989 $250,000 4y 1m 86% 16%
09/11/1985 $134,708 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090059167-3203_Rancho_Quartillo_Carlsbad_CA_92009
03/25/2010 $540,000 8y 8m 29% 3%
07/10/2001 $418,000 1y 4m 25% 18%
02/22/2000 $333,798 n/a – –April 16, 2010 at 8:36 AM #539787ParticipantCAR, how about these?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100014822-2855_Rancho_Ganadero_St_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/13/2010 $660,000 9y 11m 34% 3%
05/04/2000 $490,900 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100009649-2192_Corte_Arboles_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/09/2010 $790,000 10y 7m 89% 6%
08/23/1999 $418,135 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100005846-7930_Sitio_Granado_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/06/2010 $740,000 10y 4m 73% 5%
11/12/1999 $427,285 n/a – –
————————————————–
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100014021-6225_Paseo_Alta_Rico_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/06/2010 $980,000 7y 12m -15% -2%
04/11/2002 $1,150,000 2y 5m 51% 18%
10/27/1999 $760,273 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100001641-6817_Camino_De_Amigos_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/05/2010 $565,000 9y 6m 77% 6%
09/11/2000 $319,871 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100001126-7867_Grado_Cipreso_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/01/2010 $638,625 8y 3m 45% 5%
12/19/2001 $439,500 3y 1m 38% 11%
11/13/1998 $317,990 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090015161-7237_Almaden_Ln_Carlsbad_CA_92009
03/30/2010 $1,225,000 6y 10m -15% -2%
05/14/2003 $1,440,000 2y 9m 20% 7%
08/16/2000 $1,200,000 11m 100% 113%
09/17/1999 $600,000 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100007826-3103_Rancho_Del_Canon_St_Carlsbad_CA_92009
03/30/2010 $452,000 4y 8m -23% -5%
07/21/2005 $585,000 5y 9m 134% 16%
09/28/1999 $249,594 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090060318-7961_Calle_Posada_Carlsbad_CA_92009
03/30/2010 $450,000 7y 8m 8% 1%
07/17/2002 $415,000 3y 40% 12%
07/09/1999 $297,000 9y 8m 19% 2%
10/12/1989 $250,000 4y 1m 86% 16%
09/11/1985 $134,708 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090059167-3203_Rancho_Quartillo_Carlsbad_CA_92009
03/25/2010 $540,000 8y 8m 29% 3%
07/10/2001 $418,000 1y 4m 25% 18%
02/22/2000 $333,798 n/a – –April 16, 2010 at 8:36 AM #540259ParticipantCAR, how about these?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100014822-2855_Rancho_Ganadero_St_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/13/2010 $660,000 9y 11m 34% 3%
05/04/2000 $490,900 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100009649-2192_Corte_Arboles_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/09/2010 $790,000 10y 7m 89% 6%
08/23/1999 $418,135 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100005846-7930_Sitio_Granado_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/06/2010 $740,000 10y 4m 73% 5%
11/12/1999 $427,285 n/a – –
————————————————–
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100014021-6225_Paseo_Alta_Rico_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/06/2010 $980,000 7y 12m -15% -2%
04/11/2002 $1,150,000 2y 5m 51% 18%
10/27/1999 $760,273 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100001641-6817_Camino_De_Amigos_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/05/2010 $565,000 9y 6m 77% 6%
09/11/2000 $319,871 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100001126-7867_Grado_Cipreso_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/01/2010 $638,625 8y 3m 45% 5%
12/19/2001 $439,500 3y 1m 38% 11%
11/13/1998 $317,990 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090015161-7237_Almaden_Ln_Carlsbad_CA_92009
03/30/2010 $1,225,000 6y 10m -15% -2%
05/14/2003 $1,440,000 2y 9m 20% 7%
08/16/2000 $1,200,000 11m 100% 113%
09/17/1999 $600,000 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100007826-3103_Rancho_Del_Canon_St_Carlsbad_CA_92009
03/30/2010 $452,000 4y 8m -23% -5%
07/21/2005 $585,000 5y 9m 134% 16%
09/28/1999 $249,594 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090060318-7961_Calle_Posada_Carlsbad_CA_92009
03/30/2010 $450,000 7y 8m 8% 1%
07/17/2002 $415,000 3y 40% 12%
07/09/1999 $297,000 9y 8m 19% 2%
10/12/1989 $250,000 4y 1m 86% 16%
09/11/1985 $134,708 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090059167-3203_Rancho_Quartillo_Carlsbad_CA_92009
03/25/2010 $540,000 8y 8m 29% 3%
07/10/2001 $418,000 1y 4m 25% 18%
02/22/2000 $333,798 n/a – –April 16, 2010 at 8:36 AM #540352ParticipantCAR, how about these?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100014822-2855_Rancho_Ganadero_St_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/13/2010 $660,000 9y 11m 34% 3%
05/04/2000 $490,900 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100009649-2192_Corte_Arboles_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/09/2010 $790,000 10y 7m 89% 6%
08/23/1999 $418,135 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100005846-7930_Sitio_Granado_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/06/2010 $740,000 10y 4m 73% 5%
11/12/1999 $427,285 n/a – –
————————————————–
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100014021-6225_Paseo_Alta_Rico_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/06/2010 $980,000 7y 12m -15% -2%
04/11/2002 $1,150,000 2y 5m 51% 18%
10/27/1999 $760,273 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100001641-6817_Camino_De_Amigos_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/05/2010 $565,000 9y 6m 77% 6%
09/11/2000 $319,871 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100001126-7867_Grado_Cipreso_Carlsbad_CA_92009
04/01/2010 $638,625 8y 3m 45% 5%
12/19/2001 $439,500 3y 1m 38% 11%
11/13/1998 $317,990 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090015161-7237_Almaden_Ln_Carlsbad_CA_92009
03/30/2010 $1,225,000 6y 10m -15% -2%
05/14/2003 $1,440,000 2y 9m 20% 7%
08/16/2000 $1,200,000 11m 100% 113%
09/17/1999 $600,000 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100007826-3103_Rancho_Del_Canon_St_Carlsbad_CA_92009
03/30/2010 $452,000 4y 8m -23% -5%
07/21/2005 $585,000 5y 9m 134% 16%
09/28/1999 $249,594 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090060318-7961_Calle_Posada_Carlsbad_CA_92009
03/30/2010 $450,000 7y 8m 8% 1%
07/17/2002 $415,000 3y 40% 12%
07/09/1999 $297,000 9y 8m 19% 2%
10/12/1989 $250,000 4y 1m 86% 16%
09/11/1985 $134,708 n/a – –
—————————————————
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090059167-3203_Rancho_Quartillo_Carlsbad_CA_92009
03/25/2010 $540,000 8y 8m 29% 3%
07/10/2001 $418,000 1y 4m 25% 18%
02/22/2000 $333,798 n/a – – -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.