- This topic has 35 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 9 months ago by patb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 31, 2011 at 4:00 PM #18459January 31, 2011 at 4:34 PM #660272jpinpbParticipant
Someone I know had their loan delayed b/c they had to explain why some addresses came up associated w/the person’s name while they were running checks.
One was a rental unit the mother was occupying 10 years ago.
2 were incorrect addresses and 2 other ones were properties purchased 20 years earlier w/no encumberances except low property taxes.They went from giving loans to dead people to inquiring about questionable assets/debts from 20 years ago.
January 31, 2011 at 4:34 PM #660335jpinpbParticipantSomeone I know had their loan delayed b/c they had to explain why some addresses came up associated w/the person’s name while they were running checks.
One was a rental unit the mother was occupying 10 years ago.
2 were incorrect addresses and 2 other ones were properties purchased 20 years earlier w/no encumberances except low property taxes.They went from giving loans to dead people to inquiring about questionable assets/debts from 20 years ago.
January 31, 2011 at 4:34 PM #661408jpinpbParticipantSomeone I know had their loan delayed b/c they had to explain why some addresses came up associated w/the person’s name while they were running checks.
One was a rental unit the mother was occupying 10 years ago.
2 were incorrect addresses and 2 other ones were properties purchased 20 years earlier w/no encumberances except low property taxes.They went from giving loans to dead people to inquiring about questionable assets/debts from 20 years ago.
January 31, 2011 at 4:34 PM #660939jpinpbParticipantSomeone I know had their loan delayed b/c they had to explain why some addresses came up associated w/the person’s name while they were running checks.
One was a rental unit the mother was occupying 10 years ago.
2 were incorrect addresses and 2 other ones were properties purchased 20 years earlier w/no encumberances except low property taxes.They went from giving loans to dead people to inquiring about questionable assets/debts from 20 years ago.
January 31, 2011 at 4:34 PM #661078jpinpbParticipantSomeone I know had their loan delayed b/c they had to explain why some addresses came up associated w/the person’s name while they were running checks.
One was a rental unit the mother was occupying 10 years ago.
2 were incorrect addresses and 2 other ones were properties purchased 20 years earlier w/no encumberances except low property taxes.They went from giving loans to dead people to inquiring about questionable assets/debts from 20 years ago.
January 31, 2011 at 4:43 PM #660277daveljParticipant(I assume you mean that these “certain strategies” are designed to maximize your AFTER-tax cash flow as opposed to your PRE-tax stated income. Just making sure.)
Yup, I’ve had the same “problems.” But, frankly, I view this as a good thing. It means the lenders are paying much closer attention. So, it didn’t really bother me. Underwriting standards are going “Back to the 90s.” As they should be.
I have some extensive diagrams and spreadsheets that explain pretty clearly how everything fits together and after I did it the first time it just required updating. You might want to consider doing something similar in order to save yourself the grief next time around.
January 31, 2011 at 4:43 PM #660340daveljParticipant(I assume you mean that these “certain strategies” are designed to maximize your AFTER-tax cash flow as opposed to your PRE-tax stated income. Just making sure.)
Yup, I’ve had the same “problems.” But, frankly, I view this as a good thing. It means the lenders are paying much closer attention. So, it didn’t really bother me. Underwriting standards are going “Back to the 90s.” As they should be.
I have some extensive diagrams and spreadsheets that explain pretty clearly how everything fits together and after I did it the first time it just required updating. You might want to consider doing something similar in order to save yourself the grief next time around.
January 31, 2011 at 4:43 PM #661413daveljParticipant(I assume you mean that these “certain strategies” are designed to maximize your AFTER-tax cash flow as opposed to your PRE-tax stated income. Just making sure.)
Yup, I’ve had the same “problems.” But, frankly, I view this as a good thing. It means the lenders are paying much closer attention. So, it didn’t really bother me. Underwriting standards are going “Back to the 90s.” As they should be.
I have some extensive diagrams and spreadsheets that explain pretty clearly how everything fits together and after I did it the first time it just required updating. You might want to consider doing something similar in order to save yourself the grief next time around.
January 31, 2011 at 4:43 PM #661083daveljParticipant(I assume you mean that these “certain strategies” are designed to maximize your AFTER-tax cash flow as opposed to your PRE-tax stated income. Just making sure.)
Yup, I’ve had the same “problems.” But, frankly, I view this as a good thing. It means the lenders are paying much closer attention. So, it didn’t really bother me. Underwriting standards are going “Back to the 90s.” As they should be.
I have some extensive diagrams and spreadsheets that explain pretty clearly how everything fits together and after I did it the first time it just required updating. You might want to consider doing something similar in order to save yourself the grief next time around.
January 31, 2011 at 4:43 PM #660944daveljParticipant(I assume you mean that these “certain strategies” are designed to maximize your AFTER-tax cash flow as opposed to your PRE-tax stated income. Just making sure.)
Yup, I’ve had the same “problems.” But, frankly, I view this as a good thing. It means the lenders are paying much closer attention. So, it didn’t really bother me. Underwriting standards are going “Back to the 90s.” As they should be.
I have some extensive diagrams and spreadsheets that explain pretty clearly how everything fits together and after I did it the first time it just required updating. You might want to consider doing something similar in order to save yourself the grief next time around.
February 1, 2011 at 7:59 AM #661101EconProfParticipantA few years ago when I bought investment properties I took out 15-year loans in order to retire the debt faster, and to get about a 1/2% break in the interest rate. Of course cash flow suffers on these investments since so much of the monthly payments goes to principle.
Now, however, banks rake me over the coals when I try to get a loan, because “You don’t have enough cash flow”. My great balance sheet doesn’t matter to them, or my better interest rate on existing loans. (Nor, BTW, does proof of living below one’s income). They just want wage slaves, or last year’s favorable Form 1040, or commissioned salesmen coming off of a good year. Very frustrating.February 1, 2011 at 7:59 AM #661571EconProfParticipantA few years ago when I bought investment properties I took out 15-year loans in order to retire the debt faster, and to get about a 1/2% break in the interest rate. Of course cash flow suffers on these investments since so much of the monthly payments goes to principle.
Now, however, banks rake me over the coals when I try to get a loan, because “You don’t have enough cash flow”. My great balance sheet doesn’t matter to them, or my better interest rate on existing loans. (Nor, BTW, does proof of living below one’s income). They just want wage slaves, or last year’s favorable Form 1040, or commissioned salesmen coming off of a good year. Very frustrating.February 1, 2011 at 7:59 AM #661240EconProfParticipantA few years ago when I bought investment properties I took out 15-year loans in order to retire the debt faster, and to get about a 1/2% break in the interest rate. Of course cash flow suffers on these investments since so much of the monthly payments goes to principle.
Now, however, banks rake me over the coals when I try to get a loan, because “You don’t have enough cash flow”. My great balance sheet doesn’t matter to them, or my better interest rate on existing loans. (Nor, BTW, does proof of living below one’s income). They just want wage slaves, or last year’s favorable Form 1040, or commissioned salesmen coming off of a good year. Very frustrating.February 1, 2011 at 7:59 AM #660434EconProfParticipantA few years ago when I bought investment properties I took out 15-year loans in order to retire the debt faster, and to get about a 1/2% break in the interest rate. Of course cash flow suffers on these investments since so much of the monthly payments goes to principle.
Now, however, banks rake me over the coals when I try to get a loan, because “You don’t have enough cash flow”. My great balance sheet doesn’t matter to them, or my better interest rate on existing loans. (Nor, BTW, does proof of living below one’s income). They just want wage slaves, or last year’s favorable Form 1040, or commissioned salesmen coming off of a good year. Very frustrating. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.