Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Unbelieveable Fed Audit????
- This topic has 40 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by
patientrenter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 25, 2009 at 5:35 PM #373586March 25, 2009 at 5:52 PM #372984
patientrenter
ParticipantIf you think Barney Frank is not fully informed of what the Fed does (only the parts he wants to know), then I have a bridge to sell you, for a very attractive price. Cash in advance, please!
March 25, 2009 at 5:52 PM #373266patientrenter
ParticipantIf you think Barney Frank is not fully informed of what the Fed does (only the parts he wants to know), then I have a bridge to sell you, for a very attractive price. Cash in advance, please!
March 25, 2009 at 5:52 PM #373440patientrenter
ParticipantIf you think Barney Frank is not fully informed of what the Fed does (only the parts he wants to know), then I have a bridge to sell you, for a very attractive price. Cash in advance, please!
March 25, 2009 at 5:52 PM #373483patientrenter
ParticipantIf you think Barney Frank is not fully informed of what the Fed does (only the parts he wants to know), then I have a bridge to sell you, for a very attractive price. Cash in advance, please!
March 25, 2009 at 5:52 PM #373596patientrenter
ParticipantIf you think Barney Frank is not fully informed of what the Fed does (only the parts he wants to know), then I have a bridge to sell you, for a very attractive price. Cash in advance, please!
March 25, 2009 at 6:00 PM #372988Arraya
ParticipantOh, leave the Fed alone. They and their cohorts at the IMF and World Bank in no way influence world affairs. Just because in their job description they are supposed to protect from asset bubbles and when examining their actions they clearly exacerbated the bubble does not mean we should investigate them. Why should the US investigate a private firm that they contract to perform a task after it fails tremendously at the task. It’s ridiculous. I mean they just make the money, it’s the countries that decide how to use it. They are harmless and should not be looked at. Really, the power to make money is nothing. It’s not even an important job, anybody could do it.
March 25, 2009 at 6:00 PM #373271Arraya
ParticipantOh, leave the Fed alone. They and their cohorts at the IMF and World Bank in no way influence world affairs. Just because in their job description they are supposed to protect from asset bubbles and when examining their actions they clearly exacerbated the bubble does not mean we should investigate them. Why should the US investigate a private firm that they contract to perform a task after it fails tremendously at the task. It’s ridiculous. I mean they just make the money, it’s the countries that decide how to use it. They are harmless and should not be looked at. Really, the power to make money is nothing. It’s not even an important job, anybody could do it.
March 25, 2009 at 6:00 PM #373445Arraya
ParticipantOh, leave the Fed alone. They and their cohorts at the IMF and World Bank in no way influence world affairs. Just because in their job description they are supposed to protect from asset bubbles and when examining their actions they clearly exacerbated the bubble does not mean we should investigate them. Why should the US investigate a private firm that they contract to perform a task after it fails tremendously at the task. It’s ridiculous. I mean they just make the money, it’s the countries that decide how to use it. They are harmless and should not be looked at. Really, the power to make money is nothing. It’s not even an important job, anybody could do it.
March 25, 2009 at 6:00 PM #373488Arraya
ParticipantOh, leave the Fed alone. They and their cohorts at the IMF and World Bank in no way influence world affairs. Just because in their job description they are supposed to protect from asset bubbles and when examining their actions they clearly exacerbated the bubble does not mean we should investigate them. Why should the US investigate a private firm that they contract to perform a task after it fails tremendously at the task. It’s ridiculous. I mean they just make the money, it’s the countries that decide how to use it. They are harmless and should not be looked at. Really, the power to make money is nothing. It’s not even an important job, anybody could do it.
March 25, 2009 at 6:00 PM #373601Arraya
ParticipantOh, leave the Fed alone. They and their cohorts at the IMF and World Bank in no way influence world affairs. Just because in their job description they are supposed to protect from asset bubbles and when examining their actions they clearly exacerbated the bubble does not mean we should investigate them. Why should the US investigate a private firm that they contract to perform a task after it fails tremendously at the task. It’s ridiculous. I mean they just make the money, it’s the countries that decide how to use it. They are harmless and should not be looked at. Really, the power to make money is nothing. It’s not even an important job, anybody could do it.
March 25, 2009 at 7:45 PM #373023patientrenter
ParticipantI’ll leave this alone after this comment, since there are obviously a few folks who want to believe that we got here because of a few conspirators in the Federal Reserve and Goldman Sachs.
I’d love for a group of completely objective journalists, not beholden to any political point of view, to focus on the people who were most responsible for blowing air into the asset bubble, but I think lots of posters here would be disappointed to find how many of “their people” were responsible.
March 25, 2009 at 7:45 PM #373306patientrenter
ParticipantI’ll leave this alone after this comment, since there are obviously a few folks who want to believe that we got here because of a few conspirators in the Federal Reserve and Goldman Sachs.
I’d love for a group of completely objective journalists, not beholden to any political point of view, to focus on the people who were most responsible for blowing air into the asset bubble, but I think lots of posters here would be disappointed to find how many of “their people” were responsible.
March 25, 2009 at 7:45 PM #373479patientrenter
ParticipantI’ll leave this alone after this comment, since there are obviously a few folks who want to believe that we got here because of a few conspirators in the Federal Reserve and Goldman Sachs.
I’d love for a group of completely objective journalists, not beholden to any political point of view, to focus on the people who were most responsible for blowing air into the asset bubble, but I think lots of posters here would be disappointed to find how many of “their people” were responsible.
March 25, 2009 at 7:45 PM #373523patientrenter
ParticipantI’ll leave this alone after this comment, since there are obviously a few folks who want to believe that we got here because of a few conspirators in the Federal Reserve and Goldman Sachs.
I’d love for a group of completely objective journalists, not beholden to any political point of view, to focus on the people who were most responsible for blowing air into the asset bubble, but I think lots of posters here would be disappointed to find how many of “their people” were responsible.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
