UCSD will build new Nano-tech engineering building

[Coronita]

[quote=briansd1][quote=flu]
Can you give me your dad’s doctor’s name. I have been procrastinating to have this procedure done. Last time i went, I waited 4 hrs and ended up just going home.[/quote]

Ok. I’ll look it up this weekend.

Wow, you already need cataract surgery but you’re not even senior yet. That’s pretty young to need it.[/quote]

Yeah, I know. Lucky me in many regards…I’m not crying about it though.

[briansd1]

flu, here is the info.

Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htm

Looking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.

FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.

Best wishes to you with the surgery.

[briansd1]

flu, here is the info.

Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htm

Looking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.

FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.

Best wishes to you with the surgery.

[briansd1]

flu, here is the info.

Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htm

Looking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.

FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.

Best wishes to you with the surgery.

[briansd1]

flu, here is the info.

Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htm

Looking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.

FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.

Best wishes to you with the surgery.

[briansd1]

flu, here is the info.

Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htm

Looking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.

FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.

Best wishes to you with the surgery.

[Coronita]

[quote=briansd1]flu, here is the info.

Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htm

Looking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.

FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.

Best wishes to you with the surgery.[/quote]

Thanks. I’m not sure I’m going to do it yet. It’s been in my eyes since I was a kid, so there’s probably really no benefit to getting it out now. I’m just kinda curious how it would. $15k isn’t that bad. I had surgeons that wouldn’t were saying $25k+, some and not taking insurance and saying “here’s our rate, you can deal with your insurance yourself if you want to get reimbursed”…It’s happening more and more with the top doctors, because they can pick and choose their patients. I think it’s about to get worse.

[Coronita]

[quote=briansd1]flu, here is the info.

Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htm

Looking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.

FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.

Best wishes to you with the surgery.[/quote]

Thanks. I’m not sure I’m going to do it yet. It’s been in my eyes since I was a kid, so there’s probably really no benefit to getting it out now. I’m just kinda curious how it would. $15k isn’t that bad. I had surgeons that wouldn’t were saying $25k+, some and not taking insurance and saying “here’s our rate, you can deal with your insurance yourself if you want to get reimbursed”…It’s happening more and more with the top doctors, because they can pick and choose their patients. I think it’s about to get worse.

[Coronita]

[quote=briansd1]flu, here is the info.

Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htm

Looking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.

FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.

Best wishes to you with the surgery.[/quote]

Thanks. I’m not sure I’m going to do it yet. It’s been in my eyes since I was a kid, so there’s probably really no benefit to getting it out now. I’m just kinda curious how it would. $15k isn’t that bad. I had surgeons that wouldn’t were saying $25k+, some and not taking insurance and saying “here’s our rate, you can deal with your insurance yourself if you want to get reimbursed”…It’s happening more and more with the top doctors, because they can pick and choose their patients. I think it’s about to get worse.

[Coronita]

[quote=briansd1]flu, here is the info.

Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htm

Looking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.

FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.

Best wishes to you with the surgery.[/quote]

Thanks. I’m not sure I’m going to do it yet. It’s been in my eyes since I was a kid, so there’s probably really no benefit to getting it out now. I’m just kinda curious how it would. $15k isn’t that bad. I had surgeons that wouldn’t were saying $25k+, some and not taking insurance and saying “here’s our rate, you can deal with your insurance yourself if you want to get reimbursed”…It’s happening more and more with the top doctors, because they can pick and choose their patients. I think it’s about to get worse.

[Coronita]

[quote=briansd1]flu, here is the info.

Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htm

Looking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.

FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.

Best wishes to you with the surgery.[/quote]

Thanks. I’m not sure I’m going to do it yet. It’s been in my eyes since I was a kid, so there’s probably really no benefit to getting it out now. I’m just kinda curious how it would. $15k isn’t that bad. I had surgeons that wouldn’t were saying $25k+, some and not taking insurance and saying “here’s our rate, you can deal with your insurance yourself if you want to get reimbursed”…It’s happening more and more with the top doctors, because they can pick and choose their patients. I think it’s about to get worse.

[svelte]

[quote=Eugene]

I have it from reliable sources that the nano-tech building will look somewhat like this

[/quote]

Aaah.

Nano-nano.

[svelte]

[quote=Eugene]

I have it from reliable sources that the nano-tech building will look somewhat like this

[/quote]

Aaah.

Nano-nano.

[svelte]

[quote=Eugene]

I have it from reliable sources that the nano-tech building will look somewhat like this

[/quote]

Aaah.

Nano-nano.

[svelte]

[quote=Eugene]

I have it from reliable sources that the nano-tech building will look somewhat like this

[/quote]

Aaah.

Nano-nano.

[Author]

Posts