- This topic has 95 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by
XBoxBoy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 28, 2010 at 1:27 PM #545525April 28, 2010 at 2:32 PM #544573
briansd1
Guestflu, here is the info.
Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htmLooking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.
FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.
Best wishes to you with the surgery.
April 28, 2010 at 2:32 PM #544688briansd1
Guestflu, here is the info.
Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htmLooking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.
FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.
Best wishes to you with the surgery.
April 28, 2010 at 2:32 PM #545166briansd1
Guestflu, here is the info.
Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htmLooking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.
FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.
Best wishes to you with the surgery.
April 28, 2010 at 2:32 PM #545263briansd1
Guestflu, here is the info.
Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htmLooking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.
FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.
Best wishes to you with the surgery.
April 28, 2010 at 2:32 PM #545535briansd1
Guestflu, here is the info.
Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htmLooking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.
FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.
Best wishes to you with the surgery.
April 28, 2010 at 3:03 PM #544578
CoronitaParticipant[quote=briansd1]flu, here is the info.
Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htmLooking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.
FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.
Best wishes to you with the surgery.[/quote]
Thanks. I’m not sure I’m going to do it yet. It’s been in my eyes since I was a kid, so there’s probably really no benefit to getting it out now. I’m just kinda curious how it would. $15k isn’t that bad. I had surgeons that wouldn’t were saying $25k+, some and not taking insurance and saying “here’s our rate, you can deal with your insurance yourself if you want to get reimbursed”…It’s happening more and more with the top doctors, because they can pick and choose their patients. I think it’s about to get worse.
April 28, 2010 at 3:03 PM #544693
CoronitaParticipant[quote=briansd1]flu, here is the info.
Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htmLooking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.
FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.
Best wishes to you with the surgery.[/quote]
Thanks. I’m not sure I’m going to do it yet. It’s been in my eyes since I was a kid, so there’s probably really no benefit to getting it out now. I’m just kinda curious how it would. $15k isn’t that bad. I had surgeons that wouldn’t were saying $25k+, some and not taking insurance and saying “here’s our rate, you can deal with your insurance yourself if you want to get reimbursed”…It’s happening more and more with the top doctors, because they can pick and choose their patients. I think it’s about to get worse.
April 28, 2010 at 3:03 PM #545171
CoronitaParticipant[quote=briansd1]flu, here is the info.
Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htmLooking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.
FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.
Best wishes to you with the surgery.[/quote]
Thanks. I’m not sure I’m going to do it yet. It’s been in my eyes since I was a kid, so there’s probably really no benefit to getting it out now. I’m just kinda curious how it would. $15k isn’t that bad. I had surgeons that wouldn’t were saying $25k+, some and not taking insurance and saying “here’s our rate, you can deal with your insurance yourself if you want to get reimbursed”…It’s happening more and more with the top doctors, because they can pick and choose their patients. I think it’s about to get worse.
April 28, 2010 at 3:03 PM #545268
CoronitaParticipant[quote=briansd1]flu, here is the info.
Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htmLooking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.
FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.
Best wishes to you with the surgery.[/quote]
Thanks. I’m not sure I’m going to do it yet. It’s been in my eyes since I was a kid, so there’s probably really no benefit to getting it out now. I’m just kinda curious how it would. $15k isn’t that bad. I had surgeons that wouldn’t were saying $25k+, some and not taking insurance and saying “here’s our rate, you can deal with your insurance yourself if you want to get reimbursed”…It’s happening more and more with the top doctors, because they can pick and choose their patients. I think it’s about to get worse.
April 28, 2010 at 3:03 PM #545540
CoronitaParticipant[quote=briansd1]flu, here is the info.
Dr. David Schanzlin
http://eyesite.ucsd.edu/faculty/schanzlin.htmLooking at the Medicare Summary Notice, the charges were $4,968 + $5,030 + $4,070 + 630 = $14,698, before deductible and co-insurance. No wonder our country is going bankrupt.
FYI, there is the standard monofocal lens and the optional, more expensive premium multifocal lenses. But those are only a few years old.
Best wishes to you with the surgery.[/quote]
Thanks. I’m not sure I’m going to do it yet. It’s been in my eyes since I was a kid, so there’s probably really no benefit to getting it out now. I’m just kinda curious how it would. $15k isn’t that bad. I had surgeons that wouldn’t were saying $25k+, some and not taking insurance and saying “here’s our rate, you can deal with your insurance yourself if you want to get reimbursed”…It’s happening more and more with the top doctors, because they can pick and choose their patients. I think it’s about to get worse.
April 28, 2010 at 7:02 PM #544669svelte
Participant[quote=Eugene]
I have it from reliable sources that the nano-tech building will look somewhat like this
[/quote]
Aaah.
Nano-nano.
April 28, 2010 at 7:02 PM #544783svelte
Participant[quote=Eugene]
I have it from reliable sources that the nano-tech building will look somewhat like this
[/quote]
Aaah.
Nano-nano.
April 28, 2010 at 7:02 PM #545261svelte
Participant[quote=Eugene]
I have it from reliable sources that the nano-tech building will look somewhat like this
[/quote]
Aaah.
Nano-nano.
April 28, 2010 at 7:02 PM #545358svelte
Participant[quote=Eugene]
I have it from reliable sources that the nano-tech building will look somewhat like this
[/quote]
Aaah.
Nano-nano.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
