- This topic has 40 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by
scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 13, 2010 at 12:30 PM #591507August 13, 2010 at 1:05 PM #590469
all
ParticipantI guess it is not impossible, but it is not very likely.
What’s in it for the owner? As a tenant you are obligated to pay the full rent regardless of the owner’s NOD/NOT. So, the tenant would need to motivate the owner and lose it all if the bank finds a willing buyer.
In reality the tenant is more likely to enjoy three months without paying rent and/or get some cash to leave early and/or without trashing the place.
August 13, 2010 at 1:05 PM #590562all
ParticipantI guess it is not impossible, but it is not very likely.
What’s in it for the owner? As a tenant you are obligated to pay the full rent regardless of the owner’s NOD/NOT. So, the tenant would need to motivate the owner and lose it all if the bank finds a willing buyer.
In reality the tenant is more likely to enjoy three months without paying rent and/or get some cash to leave early and/or without trashing the place.
August 13, 2010 at 1:05 PM #591099all
ParticipantI guess it is not impossible, but it is not very likely.
What’s in it for the owner? As a tenant you are obligated to pay the full rent regardless of the owner’s NOD/NOT. So, the tenant would need to motivate the owner and lose it all if the bank finds a willing buyer.
In reality the tenant is more likely to enjoy three months without paying rent and/or get some cash to leave early and/or without trashing the place.
August 13, 2010 at 1:05 PM #591209all
ParticipantI guess it is not impossible, but it is not very likely.
What’s in it for the owner? As a tenant you are obligated to pay the full rent regardless of the owner’s NOD/NOT. So, the tenant would need to motivate the owner and lose it all if the bank finds a willing buyer.
In reality the tenant is more likely to enjoy three months without paying rent and/or get some cash to leave early and/or without trashing the place.
August 13, 2010 at 1:05 PM #591517all
ParticipantI guess it is not impossible, but it is not very likely.
What’s in it for the owner? As a tenant you are obligated to pay the full rent regardless of the owner’s NOD/NOT. So, the tenant would need to motivate the owner and lose it all if the bank finds a willing buyer.
In reality the tenant is more likely to enjoy three months without paying rent and/or get some cash to leave early and/or without trashing the place.
August 13, 2010 at 1:06 PM #5904742009 Buyer
Participantif I understand this law correctly, you need to close on the lease specifics before the NOD –
Yes, a large “Deposit” in exchange for low rent.
August 13, 2010 at 1:06 PM #5905672009 Buyer
Participantif I understand this law correctly, you need to close on the lease specifics before the NOD –
Yes, a large “Deposit” in exchange for low rent.
August 13, 2010 at 1:06 PM #5911042009 Buyer
Participantif I understand this law correctly, you need to close on the lease specifics before the NOD –
Yes, a large “Deposit” in exchange for low rent.
August 13, 2010 at 1:06 PM #5912142009 Buyer
Participantif I understand this law correctly, you need to close on the lease specifics before the NOD –
Yes, a large “Deposit” in exchange for low rent.
August 13, 2010 at 1:06 PM #5915222009 Buyer
Participantif I understand this law correctly, you need to close on the lease specifics before the NOD –
Yes, a large “Deposit” in exchange for low rent.
August 13, 2010 at 3:04 PM #590514Ash Housewares
ParticipantIt was my understanding that the lease had to be market rate to remain valid for it’s duration under a new owner. So, no 10 yr $100/month leases to your mother. I can’t remember where I heard this though.
August 13, 2010 at 3:04 PM #590607Ash Housewares
ParticipantIt was my understanding that the lease had to be market rate to remain valid for it’s duration under a new owner. So, no 10 yr $100/month leases to your mother. I can’t remember where I heard this though.
August 13, 2010 at 3:04 PM #591145Ash Housewares
ParticipantIt was my understanding that the lease had to be market rate to remain valid for it’s duration under a new owner. So, no 10 yr $100/month leases to your mother. I can’t remember where I heard this though.
August 13, 2010 at 3:04 PM #591254Ash Housewares
ParticipantIt was my understanding that the lease had to be market rate to remain valid for it’s duration under a new owner. So, no 10 yr $100/month leases to your mother. I can’t remember where I heard this though.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
