- This topic has 80 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
outtamojo.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 11, 2010 at 8:15 AM #511972February 11, 2010 at 8:30 AM #512884
Arraya
ParticipantThis article contradicts itself. It says that this is for people who *choose* to default in one sentence than in another is says it for people who *don’t* qualify for a loan mod or short sale.
If somebody does not qualify for a loan modification they are probably not choosing to default.
Then it goes on to say how long it is taking to foreclose in some states and that it is expensive.
So what’s going on here?
It looks like basically the banks are weeding out the people that don’t have any money and kicking them out faster. hahaha
February 11, 2010 at 8:30 AM #512540Arraya
ParticipantThis article contradicts itself. It says that this is for people who *choose* to default in one sentence than in another is says it for people who *don’t* qualify for a loan mod or short sale.
If somebody does not qualify for a loan modification they are probably not choosing to default.
Then it goes on to say how long it is taking to foreclose in some states and that it is expensive.
So what’s going on here?
It looks like basically the banks are weeding out the people that don’t have any money and kicking them out faster. hahaha
February 11, 2010 at 8:30 AM #512125Arraya
ParticipantThis article contradicts itself. It says that this is for people who *choose* to default in one sentence than in another is says it for people who *don’t* qualify for a loan mod or short sale.
If somebody does not qualify for a loan modification they are probably not choosing to default.
Then it goes on to say how long it is taking to foreclose in some states and that it is expensive.
So what’s going on here?
It looks like basically the banks are weeding out the people that don’t have any money and kicking them out faster. hahaha
February 11, 2010 at 8:30 AM #511977Arraya
ParticipantThis article contradicts itself. It says that this is for people who *choose* to default in one sentence than in another is says it for people who *don’t* qualify for a loan mod or short sale.
If somebody does not qualify for a loan modification they are probably not choosing to default.
Then it goes on to say how long it is taking to foreclose in some states and that it is expensive.
So what’s going on here?
It looks like basically the banks are weeding out the people that don’t have any money and kicking them out faster. hahaha
February 11, 2010 at 8:30 AM #512632Arraya
ParticipantThis article contradicts itself. It says that this is for people who *choose* to default in one sentence than in another is says it for people who *don’t* qualify for a loan mod or short sale.
If somebody does not qualify for a loan modification they are probably not choosing to default.
Then it goes on to say how long it is taking to foreclose in some states and that it is expensive.
So what’s going on here?
It looks like basically the banks are weeding out the people that don’t have any money and kicking them out faster. hahaha
February 11, 2010 at 8:34 AM #512889sdduuuude
ParticipantSeems like a reasonable idea to me. It’s a little slow, but accomplishes what needs to be accomplished at a pretty low cost without requiring additional bank staff. It either means inventory will eventually hit the housing resale market -or- inventory will hit the rental market. Either way, that’s downward price pressure on housing.
February 11, 2010 at 8:34 AM #511982sdduuuude
ParticipantSeems like a reasonable idea to me. It’s a little slow, but accomplishes what needs to be accomplished at a pretty low cost without requiring additional bank staff. It either means inventory will eventually hit the housing resale market -or- inventory will hit the rental market. Either way, that’s downward price pressure on housing.
February 11, 2010 at 8:34 AM #512130sdduuuude
ParticipantSeems like a reasonable idea to me. It’s a little slow, but accomplishes what needs to be accomplished at a pretty low cost without requiring additional bank staff. It either means inventory will eventually hit the housing resale market -or- inventory will hit the rental market. Either way, that’s downward price pressure on housing.
February 11, 2010 at 8:34 AM #512545sdduuuude
ParticipantSeems like a reasonable idea to me. It’s a little slow, but accomplishes what needs to be accomplished at a pretty low cost without requiring additional bank staff. It either means inventory will eventually hit the housing resale market -or- inventory will hit the rental market. Either way, that’s downward price pressure on housing.
February 11, 2010 at 8:34 AM #512637sdduuuude
ParticipantSeems like a reasonable idea to me. It’s a little slow, but accomplishes what needs to be accomplished at a pretty low cost without requiring additional bank staff. It either means inventory will eventually hit the housing resale market -or- inventory will hit the rental market. Either way, that’s downward price pressure on housing.
February 11, 2010 at 8:38 AM #511987sdduuuude
ParticipantYa, good point, Arraya. I guess the question is – if I’m going to default, why not jsut stop making payments, not tell the bank, and live rent-free for 12 months instead of 6 ?
February 11, 2010 at 8:38 AM #512549sdduuuude
ParticipantYa, good point, Arraya. I guess the question is – if I’m going to default, why not jsut stop making payments, not tell the bank, and live rent-free for 12 months instead of 6 ?
February 11, 2010 at 8:38 AM #512642sdduuuude
ParticipantYa, good point, Arraya. I guess the question is – if I’m going to default, why not jsut stop making payments, not tell the bank, and live rent-free for 12 months instead of 6 ?
February 11, 2010 at 8:38 AM #512135sdduuuude
ParticipantYa, good point, Arraya. I guess the question is – if I’m going to default, why not jsut stop making payments, not tell the bank, and live rent-free for 12 months instead of 6 ?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.