Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Timing the Bottom
- This topic has 483 replies, 36 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by lurkor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 10, 2007 at 9:25 AM #112961December 10, 2007 at 9:25 AM #113001(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant
I’m sure there are many homes listed on the market for people who were just testing the market to see what they could sell their homes for, and if they don’t get the price they want (which they won’t), they will end up just staying put. So how is that accounted for in the inventory numbers?
I’m sure there are many homes NOT listed on the market for people who previously tried to sell and just gave up.
So, how is this accounted for in the inventory numbers ?Obviously these are not accounted for in the inventory numbers.
So, what is your point ?December 10, 2007 at 9:25 AM #113009(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI’m sure there are many homes listed on the market for people who were just testing the market to see what they could sell their homes for, and if they don’t get the price they want (which they won’t), they will end up just staying put. So how is that accounted for in the inventory numbers?
I’m sure there are many homes NOT listed on the market for people who previously tried to sell and just gave up.
So, how is this accounted for in the inventory numbers ?Obviously these are not accounted for in the inventory numbers.
So, what is your point ?December 10, 2007 at 9:25 AM #113043(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI’m sure there are many homes listed on the market for people who were just testing the market to see what they could sell their homes for, and if they don’t get the price they want (which they won’t), they will end up just staying put. So how is that accounted for in the inventory numbers?
I’m sure there are many homes NOT listed on the market for people who previously tried to sell and just gave up.
So, how is this accounted for in the inventory numbers ?Obviously these are not accounted for in the inventory numbers.
So, what is your point ?December 11, 2007 at 3:13 PM #114346RatherOpinionatedParticipantThe Pending Homes Sales Index rose 0.6% in October, the second straight monthly increase, indicating some stability may be returning to the housing market. That stability is expected to continue over the next couple of months, as mortgage disruptions have eased.
Nevertheless, pending sales are down 18.4% from a year ago. Sales were not evenly distributed, rising strongly in the Northeast and moderately in the West, but falling in the South and Midwest. NAR expects a gradual rise in existing home sales in 2008, up 0.5% to 5.70 million. Median prices are expected to edge 0.3% higher after falling 1.9% in 2007.
Our working assumption has been that the housing market would bottom in the first half of 2008. One indicator arguing that a housing bottom is near is residential spending relative to household net worth fell to 1.07%, consistent with prior housing bottoms.
December 11, 2007 at 3:13 PM #114469RatherOpinionatedParticipantThe Pending Homes Sales Index rose 0.6% in October, the second straight monthly increase, indicating some stability may be returning to the housing market. That stability is expected to continue over the next couple of months, as mortgage disruptions have eased.
Nevertheless, pending sales are down 18.4% from a year ago. Sales were not evenly distributed, rising strongly in the Northeast and moderately in the West, but falling in the South and Midwest. NAR expects a gradual rise in existing home sales in 2008, up 0.5% to 5.70 million. Median prices are expected to edge 0.3% higher after falling 1.9% in 2007.
Our working assumption has been that the housing market would bottom in the first half of 2008. One indicator arguing that a housing bottom is near is residential spending relative to household net worth fell to 1.07%, consistent with prior housing bottoms.
December 11, 2007 at 3:13 PM #114506RatherOpinionatedParticipantThe Pending Homes Sales Index rose 0.6% in October, the second straight monthly increase, indicating some stability may be returning to the housing market. That stability is expected to continue over the next couple of months, as mortgage disruptions have eased.
Nevertheless, pending sales are down 18.4% from a year ago. Sales were not evenly distributed, rising strongly in the Northeast and moderately in the West, but falling in the South and Midwest. NAR expects a gradual rise in existing home sales in 2008, up 0.5% to 5.70 million. Median prices are expected to edge 0.3% higher after falling 1.9% in 2007.
Our working assumption has been that the housing market would bottom in the first half of 2008. One indicator arguing that a housing bottom is near is residential spending relative to household net worth fell to 1.07%, consistent with prior housing bottoms.
December 11, 2007 at 3:13 PM #114512RatherOpinionatedParticipantThe Pending Homes Sales Index rose 0.6% in October, the second straight monthly increase, indicating some stability may be returning to the housing market. That stability is expected to continue over the next couple of months, as mortgage disruptions have eased.
Nevertheless, pending sales are down 18.4% from a year ago. Sales were not evenly distributed, rising strongly in the Northeast and moderately in the West, but falling in the South and Midwest. NAR expects a gradual rise in existing home sales in 2008, up 0.5% to 5.70 million. Median prices are expected to edge 0.3% higher after falling 1.9% in 2007.
Our working assumption has been that the housing market would bottom in the first half of 2008. One indicator arguing that a housing bottom is near is residential spending relative to household net worth fell to 1.07%, consistent with prior housing bottoms.
December 11, 2007 at 3:13 PM #114546RatherOpinionatedParticipantThe Pending Homes Sales Index rose 0.6% in October, the second straight monthly increase, indicating some stability may be returning to the housing market. That stability is expected to continue over the next couple of months, as mortgage disruptions have eased.
Nevertheless, pending sales are down 18.4% from a year ago. Sales were not evenly distributed, rising strongly in the Northeast and moderately in the West, but falling in the South and Midwest. NAR expects a gradual rise in existing home sales in 2008, up 0.5% to 5.70 million. Median prices are expected to edge 0.3% higher after falling 1.9% in 2007.
Our working assumption has been that the housing market would bottom in the first half of 2008. One indicator arguing that a housing bottom is near is residential spending relative to household net worth fell to 1.07%, consistent with prior housing bottoms.
December 11, 2007 at 4:45 PM #114442(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantOne indicator arguing that a housing bottom is near is residential spending relative to household net worth fell to 1.07%, consistent with prior housing bottoms.
Interesting. This is worth watching. Can you please point us to a reference. I’d like to see how long it remained this low in prior bottoms.
NAR expects … After seeing what they predicted for 2007 as of the end of 2006, that’s as far as I read that sentence. Sorry, they will eventually be right whether it’s 2008, 2009 or 2010. But their forecasts have been worthless and off the mark.
December 11, 2007 at 4:45 PM #114565(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantOne indicator arguing that a housing bottom is near is residential spending relative to household net worth fell to 1.07%, consistent with prior housing bottoms.
Interesting. This is worth watching. Can you please point us to a reference. I’d like to see how long it remained this low in prior bottoms.
NAR expects … After seeing what they predicted for 2007 as of the end of 2006, that’s as far as I read that sentence. Sorry, they will eventually be right whether it’s 2008, 2009 or 2010. But their forecasts have been worthless and off the mark.
December 11, 2007 at 4:45 PM #114604(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantOne indicator arguing that a housing bottom is near is residential spending relative to household net worth fell to 1.07%, consistent with prior housing bottoms.
Interesting. This is worth watching. Can you please point us to a reference. I’d like to see how long it remained this low in prior bottoms.
NAR expects … After seeing what they predicted for 2007 as of the end of 2006, that’s as far as I read that sentence. Sorry, they will eventually be right whether it’s 2008, 2009 or 2010. But their forecasts have been worthless and off the mark.
December 11, 2007 at 4:45 PM #114607(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantOne indicator arguing that a housing bottom is near is residential spending relative to household net worth fell to 1.07%, consistent with prior housing bottoms.
Interesting. This is worth watching. Can you please point us to a reference. I’d like to see how long it remained this low in prior bottoms.
NAR expects … After seeing what they predicted for 2007 as of the end of 2006, that’s as far as I read that sentence. Sorry, they will eventually be right whether it’s 2008, 2009 or 2010. But their forecasts have been worthless and off the mark.
December 11, 2007 at 4:45 PM #114642(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantOne indicator arguing that a housing bottom is near is residential spending relative to household net worth fell to 1.07%, consistent with prior housing bottoms.
Interesting. This is worth watching. Can you please point us to a reference. I’d like to see how long it remained this low in prior bottoms.
NAR expects … After seeing what they predicted for 2007 as of the end of 2006, that’s as far as I read that sentence. Sorry, they will eventually be right whether it’s 2008, 2009 or 2010. But their forecasts have been worthless and off the mark.
December 11, 2007 at 5:05 PM #114490SD RealtorParticipantI pretty much trust my own street smarts over anything that is reported by NAR and other associated organizations.
The past 6 months have, for me, been a crash course of how the industry really deals with distress. I have learned a great deal and anticipate that I will learn more. Over the past few months I have seen that both short sales and REO’s alike do indeed sit on offers. I would anticipate that in the case for short sales, the lack of response time is clearly due to staff shortages and a simple lack of motivation to take an official hit on the books.
Sellers may not be the only ones in denial eh? The investors know the hits are going to be made but much like the person who doesn’t like to look at thier etrade account after a bad run at the market, the investors are in no hurry to reconcile the values of thier shrinking investments. (This is all speculative)
Getting back to my point… I think that I have seen a bit of a surge in response times in the past 2 weeks from lenders regarding short sales and REO’s that I have been involved in. Maybe it is the fact they are just getting off the schnied or perhaps they are being big boys now and sucking it up. I will not be surprised at all to see a bit more of a surge in volume, with regards to lower end distressed properties here in town…
Over the past few weeks I have seen many a short and an reo go pending in both the central SD area and the south bay. Many of these were on the market for a few months. They did not all just now receive offers and go pending.
In no way do I attribute any of this activity to be a harbinger to the bottom. I feel it may be a combination of year end cleaning by the lenders but moreover a simple illustration of the pipeline finally starting to churn out results. I am still sticking to my position of this depreciation cycle being no different temporally then the prior, that we are still in year 2 and heading to 3, and that we will see cyclical rallies within the secular downtrend.
SD Realtor
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.