- This topic has 275 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by kewp.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 10, 2008 at 3:45 PM #285647October 10, 2008 at 3:54 PM #285310kewpParticipant
Generally, I do think it’s harder to let employees go on the public side. I disapprove, and believe public-sector employers ought to have more latitude to fire/replace poor performers.
I agree with this totally. The government should fire the bottom 10% performers every year as well.
Of course, that would be the whole Bush admin…
October 10, 2008 at 3:54 PM #285600kewpParticipantGenerally, I do think it’s harder to let employees go on the public side. I disapprove, and believe public-sector employers ought to have more latitude to fire/replace poor performers.
I agree with this totally. The government should fire the bottom 10% performers every year as well.
Of course, that would be the whole Bush admin…
October 10, 2008 at 3:54 PM #285621kewpParticipantGenerally, I do think it’s harder to let employees go on the public side. I disapprove, and believe public-sector employers ought to have more latitude to fire/replace poor performers.
I agree with this totally. The government should fire the bottom 10% performers every year as well.
Of course, that would be the whole Bush admin…
October 10, 2008 at 3:54 PM #285644kewpParticipantGenerally, I do think it’s harder to let employees go on the public side. I disapprove, and believe public-sector employers ought to have more latitude to fire/replace poor performers.
I agree with this totally. The government should fire the bottom 10% performers every year as well.
Of course, that would be the whole Bush admin…
October 10, 2008 at 3:54 PM #285652kewpParticipantGenerally, I do think it’s harder to let employees go on the public side. I disapprove, and believe public-sector employers ought to have more latitude to fire/replace poor performers.
I agree with this totally. The government should fire the bottom 10% performers every year as well.
Of course, that would be the whole Bush admin…
October 10, 2008 at 4:03 PM #285320RicechexParticipantI am a civil servant, federal employee with the Navy. Almost 13 years. I have seen some horrid government employees, and some very good ones.
What has been happenning over time, is the government is “outsourcing” the government employees. They become federal contractors. Now, this is a real racket folks. The company that “wins” the bid (usually a prior high ranking military officer) gets to line his pockets with gold—yes, your taxpayer dollars.
The quality of workers that he hires are suspect, and OVERALL quality is bad. These are workers that will accept very low wage, poor benefits, and/or have been unsuccessful in the field. I can guarantee that most of them are losers, and turnover is high. Heh, we had one lady under a different contract some years ago, get fired, and a few years later, get hired by different contractor in a management position. She was really nutty and a year later finally got fired again. Without seniority, comes lack of knowledge and skill, and this is gained with government employees who do not change jobs as frequently.
Now, that is if you can fill the positions. We have some contract positions that are 10 months vacant. The contractor does some special manipulation here….requires extensive degree, license, etc, but pays very low. So, the positions stay open, and guess what? Mr. Contractor can spend 10 months NOT paying an employee and put more money in his pocket!
Please don’t be fooled that getting rid of government employees means that your taxdollars will go somewhere else. All it means is that those workers are NOT on the government role, but they are being contracted, so YOU are paying.
October 10, 2008 at 4:03 PM #285610RicechexParticipantI am a civil servant, federal employee with the Navy. Almost 13 years. I have seen some horrid government employees, and some very good ones.
What has been happenning over time, is the government is “outsourcing” the government employees. They become federal contractors. Now, this is a real racket folks. The company that “wins” the bid (usually a prior high ranking military officer) gets to line his pockets with gold—yes, your taxpayer dollars.
The quality of workers that he hires are suspect, and OVERALL quality is bad. These are workers that will accept very low wage, poor benefits, and/or have been unsuccessful in the field. I can guarantee that most of them are losers, and turnover is high. Heh, we had one lady under a different contract some years ago, get fired, and a few years later, get hired by different contractor in a management position. She was really nutty and a year later finally got fired again. Without seniority, comes lack of knowledge and skill, and this is gained with government employees who do not change jobs as frequently.
Now, that is if you can fill the positions. We have some contract positions that are 10 months vacant. The contractor does some special manipulation here….requires extensive degree, license, etc, but pays very low. So, the positions stay open, and guess what? Mr. Contractor can spend 10 months NOT paying an employee and put more money in his pocket!
Please don’t be fooled that getting rid of government employees means that your taxdollars will go somewhere else. All it means is that those workers are NOT on the government role, but they are being contracted, so YOU are paying.
October 10, 2008 at 4:03 PM #285631RicechexParticipantI am a civil servant, federal employee with the Navy. Almost 13 years. I have seen some horrid government employees, and some very good ones.
What has been happenning over time, is the government is “outsourcing” the government employees. They become federal contractors. Now, this is a real racket folks. The company that “wins” the bid (usually a prior high ranking military officer) gets to line his pockets with gold—yes, your taxpayer dollars.
The quality of workers that he hires are suspect, and OVERALL quality is bad. These are workers that will accept very low wage, poor benefits, and/or have been unsuccessful in the field. I can guarantee that most of them are losers, and turnover is high. Heh, we had one lady under a different contract some years ago, get fired, and a few years later, get hired by different contractor in a management position. She was really nutty and a year later finally got fired again. Without seniority, comes lack of knowledge and skill, and this is gained with government employees who do not change jobs as frequently.
Now, that is if you can fill the positions. We have some contract positions that are 10 months vacant. The contractor does some special manipulation here….requires extensive degree, license, etc, but pays very low. So, the positions stay open, and guess what? Mr. Contractor can spend 10 months NOT paying an employee and put more money in his pocket!
Please don’t be fooled that getting rid of government employees means that your taxdollars will go somewhere else. All it means is that those workers are NOT on the government role, but they are being contracted, so YOU are paying.
October 10, 2008 at 4:03 PM #285654RicechexParticipantI am a civil servant, federal employee with the Navy. Almost 13 years. I have seen some horrid government employees, and some very good ones.
What has been happenning over time, is the government is “outsourcing” the government employees. They become federal contractors. Now, this is a real racket folks. The company that “wins” the bid (usually a prior high ranking military officer) gets to line his pockets with gold—yes, your taxpayer dollars.
The quality of workers that he hires are suspect, and OVERALL quality is bad. These are workers that will accept very low wage, poor benefits, and/or have been unsuccessful in the field. I can guarantee that most of them are losers, and turnover is high. Heh, we had one lady under a different contract some years ago, get fired, and a few years later, get hired by different contractor in a management position. She was really nutty and a year later finally got fired again. Without seniority, comes lack of knowledge and skill, and this is gained with government employees who do not change jobs as frequently.
Now, that is if you can fill the positions. We have some contract positions that are 10 months vacant. The contractor does some special manipulation here….requires extensive degree, license, etc, but pays very low. So, the positions stay open, and guess what? Mr. Contractor can spend 10 months NOT paying an employee and put more money in his pocket!
Please don’t be fooled that getting rid of government employees means that your taxdollars will go somewhere else. All it means is that those workers are NOT on the government role, but they are being contracted, so YOU are paying.
October 10, 2008 at 4:03 PM #285662RicechexParticipantI am a civil servant, federal employee with the Navy. Almost 13 years. I have seen some horrid government employees, and some very good ones.
What has been happenning over time, is the government is “outsourcing” the government employees. They become federal contractors. Now, this is a real racket folks. The company that “wins” the bid (usually a prior high ranking military officer) gets to line his pockets with gold—yes, your taxpayer dollars.
The quality of workers that he hires are suspect, and OVERALL quality is bad. These are workers that will accept very low wage, poor benefits, and/or have been unsuccessful in the field. I can guarantee that most of them are losers, and turnover is high. Heh, we had one lady under a different contract some years ago, get fired, and a few years later, get hired by different contractor in a management position. She was really nutty and a year later finally got fired again. Without seniority, comes lack of knowledge and skill, and this is gained with government employees who do not change jobs as frequently.
Now, that is if you can fill the positions. We have some contract positions that are 10 months vacant. The contractor does some special manipulation here….requires extensive degree, license, etc, but pays very low. So, the positions stay open, and guess what? Mr. Contractor can spend 10 months NOT paying an employee and put more money in his pocket!
Please don’t be fooled that getting rid of government employees means that your taxdollars will go somewhere else. All it means is that those workers are NOT on the government role, but they are being contracted, so YOU are paying.
October 10, 2008 at 4:14 PM #285325CoronitaParticipantRule #1: You can’t expect everyone to have the same level of commitment.
Corollary to Rule #1: Everyone can’t expect the same compensation for different levels of work.
Rule #2: If you are really more diligent and efficient than your peers and aren’t compensated for it, find another position for which you are.
Corollary to Rule #2: Don’t ask for a raise you don’t deserve, otherwise you’ll get it so you stop your complaining, but you’ll be the first to be on the chopping block.
Rule #3: In a recession, good workers find they are asked to do more work with equal pay
Corollary to Rule #3: Poor workers will be unemployed.
Corollary#2 to Rule #3: In a recession, surviving(employment) is more important than getting ahead (raise) (didn’t someone post this at the business level from a Sequoia Capital slide deck?)
Be prepared to :
(1) work more to replace your coworkers that got canned
(2) ensure you are working on something with the largest impact, not something that is replaceable
(3) make sure your work is well known across the management ladders (plural, because you don’t know if one ladder or the other will survive).
(4) don’t f*** up what you promised to deliver.
(5) don’t let someone steal credit for the work you created (because it could get vicious)
Rule #4: respect your youthful colleagues (fresh grads). These folks, most likely will be your future bosses.
October 10, 2008 at 4:14 PM #285615CoronitaParticipantRule #1: You can’t expect everyone to have the same level of commitment.
Corollary to Rule #1: Everyone can’t expect the same compensation for different levels of work.
Rule #2: If you are really more diligent and efficient than your peers and aren’t compensated for it, find another position for which you are.
Corollary to Rule #2: Don’t ask for a raise you don’t deserve, otherwise you’ll get it so you stop your complaining, but you’ll be the first to be on the chopping block.
Rule #3: In a recession, good workers find they are asked to do more work with equal pay
Corollary to Rule #3: Poor workers will be unemployed.
Corollary#2 to Rule #3: In a recession, surviving(employment) is more important than getting ahead (raise) (didn’t someone post this at the business level from a Sequoia Capital slide deck?)
Be prepared to :
(1) work more to replace your coworkers that got canned
(2) ensure you are working on something with the largest impact, not something that is replaceable
(3) make sure your work is well known across the management ladders (plural, because you don’t know if one ladder or the other will survive).
(4) don’t f*** up what you promised to deliver.
(5) don’t let someone steal credit for the work you created (because it could get vicious)
Rule #4: respect your youthful colleagues (fresh grads). These folks, most likely will be your future bosses.
October 10, 2008 at 4:14 PM #285636CoronitaParticipantRule #1: You can’t expect everyone to have the same level of commitment.
Corollary to Rule #1: Everyone can’t expect the same compensation for different levels of work.
Rule #2: If you are really more diligent and efficient than your peers and aren’t compensated for it, find another position for which you are.
Corollary to Rule #2: Don’t ask for a raise you don’t deserve, otherwise you’ll get it so you stop your complaining, but you’ll be the first to be on the chopping block.
Rule #3: In a recession, good workers find they are asked to do more work with equal pay
Corollary to Rule #3: Poor workers will be unemployed.
Corollary#2 to Rule #3: In a recession, surviving(employment) is more important than getting ahead (raise) (didn’t someone post this at the business level from a Sequoia Capital slide deck?)
Be prepared to :
(1) work more to replace your coworkers that got canned
(2) ensure you are working on something with the largest impact, not something that is replaceable
(3) make sure your work is well known across the management ladders (plural, because you don’t know if one ladder or the other will survive).
(4) don’t f*** up what you promised to deliver.
(5) don’t let someone steal credit for the work you created (because it could get vicious)
Rule #4: respect your youthful colleagues (fresh grads). These folks, most likely will be your future bosses.
October 10, 2008 at 4:14 PM #285659CoronitaParticipantRule #1: You can’t expect everyone to have the same level of commitment.
Corollary to Rule #1: Everyone can’t expect the same compensation for different levels of work.
Rule #2: If you are really more diligent and efficient than your peers and aren’t compensated for it, find another position for which you are.
Corollary to Rule #2: Don’t ask for a raise you don’t deserve, otherwise you’ll get it so you stop your complaining, but you’ll be the first to be on the chopping block.
Rule #3: In a recession, good workers find they are asked to do more work with equal pay
Corollary to Rule #3: Poor workers will be unemployed.
Corollary#2 to Rule #3: In a recession, surviving(employment) is more important than getting ahead (raise) (didn’t someone post this at the business level from a Sequoia Capital slide deck?)
Be prepared to :
(1) work more to replace your coworkers that got canned
(2) ensure you are working on something with the largest impact, not something that is replaceable
(3) make sure your work is well known across the management ladders (plural, because you don’t know if one ladder or the other will survive).
(4) don’t f*** up what you promised to deliver.
(5) don’t let someone steal credit for the work you created (because it could get vicious)
Rule #4: respect your youthful colleagues (fresh grads). These folks, most likely will be your future bosses.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.